EFUT has stated in a conference call they were planning to do a deal with Alibaba. EFUT has an omnichannel mobile platform which uses all avenues, such as social media, to drive sales to local stores. You'll recall Target used this approach for their Lilly Pulizter sale which sold out in hours. EFUT has more than 2M signed up in their pilot program. Recently, insiders did a private placement with the company to the tune of $3.2M. The company only has 2.95M in the float and they bought 968k shares in the private placement. Wouldn't be surprised if BABA bought them out. Gross profit margins were up 48% YoY.
798k shares at around $4.03 per share with a 180 day lockup. Big vote of confidence from Chairman, CEO, and CFO! $3.2M in cash on April 13.
The FDA clearance for unresectable liver tumors sends a message loud and clear that the equipment is capable of treating these kinds of tumors. Although it was already approved for that, insurance companies were reluctant to cover it, considering it different enough from RF that it needed more studies. Yet, according to a 2012 American Medical Association publication (Clinical Examples in Radiology, Vol. 8, Issue 3; Summer 2012), microwave is part of the radiofrequency spectrum, and simply uses a different part of the radiofrequency spectrum to develop heat energy to destroy abnormal tissue. Therefore, they instruct that microwave ablation should be reported using the CPT codes for radiofrequency ablation – 32998 (pulmonary), 47382 (liver), and 50592 (renal).
As to too many tumors, a friend of mine was told the same thing as his cancer had spread to the liver. I think too many tumors treated with ablation might lead to a non-functioning liver (mostly scar tissue). But some reports I've read have stated that ablation may be used to buy time, ie. to slow progression long enough until a liver transplant becomes available. You might consider that option.
Best wishes to you.
Check out VLTC. Just did an offering, doubling shares outstanding.
Looks like Dupuy is taking on the role for thermal ablation that Sennewald had for hyperthermia. Wonder if this new doctor can sell an MTX-180 to Sloan Kettering.
Hard to imagine WMT would drop since they sell under their Great Value brand and would have to re-qualify another vendor. There is no reason to over a silly lawsuit. WMT gets these lawsuits all the time, so they have a team of lawyers I'm sure that have looked this case over and decided it's a non-event.
Looks like they didn't do a sale-leaseback of their building. They borrowed $750k against it for 1 year.
That is a concern but is it germane to her case? Does it have to do with Sarbanes Oxley? If so, a civil lawsuit is not the venue for that. A complaint with the SEC is.
But why is this a civil lawsuit? #1 should be filed with the FTC, #2 is just the result of incompetence and is not criminal, #3 ditto. All of this is not germane as to whether Yan assaulted, berated, and threatened her. Why is the judge not tossing this out? If Ms. Hauser did not record the threatening phone call or has no witnesses to corroborate her story, she is up the creek. 1,2, and 3 do not buttress her case.
Dumped my shares at .30 via E*Trade, even though I had an order in at .22. Good job, E*Trade. Had contacted Brian McClellan to see what the shareholder equity was, but he didn't have that info on hand. Didn't want to wait to hear back from Tri-Tech in China. The company has always had a cash flow problem with the build, operate, transfer model. This model requires they have the capital up front and they get paid on the back end. Not a good model. Didn't want to hang around to see what shareholders would get in liquidation.
March 17, 2015
Re: Statement of Disagreements between Tri-Tech Holding, Inc. and Yunxiang (Phil) Fan
Based on my personal judgment as the CEO, I strongly believed that it was very hard for the Company to meet its immediate obligations due to shortage of cash in the foreseeable future. Therefore, I brought up my concerns to the Board of Directors and requested a special board meeting for guidance on Feb 27, 2015. The board meeting was conducted on March 6, 2015. As the CEO, I believe the Company was "going concern", and needed to consider a proper disclosure, and to discuss with our auditor. However, the Board disagreed to my judgment.
Furthermore, I requested the CFO and Board Auditing Committee by email and/or at the board meeting determine whether or not the Company should discuss with our Auditor since the Company is in the process of annual financial report auditing. I had not received any feedback or reports from the CFO or any other managers, directors until after my resignation.
My judgment of the Company's going concern was based on the following facts I had received recently:
1. On Feb 27, 2015, I received an email from General Manager of Tri-Tech's Tennessee Office, with two attachments - Letter - Financial Summary.doc, and Cash Flow - Master.xlsx. He also mentioned in this email that two employees had decided to take a voluntary layoff, effective immediately. In the Letter, he reported that "total due by March 15 is $322,485".
2. On March 2, 2015, I requested a list of all past-due payables of the Company, excluding Indian Operation from the Company’s Financial Department on March 4, 2015. The total amount past due was RMB 43,445,400 (or approximately US$ 7.12 million);
3. The Company lost money in the past a couple of years due to bad macro-economic situation, internal and external issues, and shortage of cash to execute or secure new contracts;
As the CEO, I didn't believe that the Company would able to raise such amount of cash to pay off the immediate obligations in a timely manner even though the Company tried many possible lending sources.
There were clearly some disagreements between the Board of Directors and me; therefore, I had no other choices but to resign from all my positions within Tri-Tech Holding, Inc. and subsidiaries, including CEO and director of the Board. I informed the Chairman and the Board via email on March 13, 2015.
Yunxiang (Phil) Fan
Former CEO and Director of the Board of Tri-Tech Holding, Inc.
6-K filed 3/20/2015 with SEC:
On March 14, 2015, Mr. Phil Fan tendered his resignation as a director and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, effective immediately. At the time of his resignation, Mr. Fan served on the Board of Directors and was Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant. In addition, he also resigned from all official capacities within the Registrant and all its subsidiaries.
On March 17, 2015, Mr. Warren Zhao was appointed as the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant in a meeting of the Board of Directors.
Mr. Fan has stated that his resignation is based on a disagreement between himself and the Registrant regarding its operations, policies and practices. In particular, Mr. Fan states that his resignation was based on his doubt that the Registrant would be able to continue as a going concern. Mr. Fan states that he believed that the Registrant should analyze and discuss with its auditor such issue. In addition, Mr. Fan did not believe the Registrant would be able to raise sufficient funds to repay its immediate obligations in a timely manner. Mr. Fan has provided a formal letter regarding his disagreement with the Registrant, and this letter is attached as an exhibit to this report.
The Registrant disagrees with Mr. Fan’s suggestion that the Registrant opposed disclosing a going concern issue. Instead, the Registrant is in the midst of preparing its annual report and is in the process of analyzing and discussing with its auditor the going concern issue. Accordingly, the Registrant has not yet reached a conclusion regarding the matter and believes the most prudent course of action is to review the matter fully in connection with its annual report and disclose fully in its audited financial statements.
That's exactly what I was thinking. She claims harassment in the suit, yet she's trying to be a whistleblower, too. If she's attempting to show Yan didn't listen to her re the UL or rebate issue, that doesn't seem to have any bearing on whether he harassed her or not. He could have rejected her advice without harassing her. What she needs are witnesses to her harassment and apparently she doesn't have any willing to come forward. The alleged call to her home by Yan with the veiled threat "you'll be sorry" was not recorded so it's a case of "he said, she said". All I can figure, is that her case is so weak, she is trying to force TCPI to plead guilty by harassing them with threats of a subpoena of their largest customers, which would jeopardize those relationships. Honestly, I don't know why her lawyers don't advise against such a move, and also why they present her case the way they have. The filings come across as hysterical ramblings, not a coherent, well-documented and reasoned case.
I hope Laura has deep pockets. I doubt her attorneys have taken this case on contingency. She's lost more in her stock value than she will have gained in a settlement. The company can drag this out for years.
The had one tenant in 3 building on last quarter's conference call. That tenant was paying $600k. Apparently, by YE they had completed construction on 16 buildings and are preparing them for leasing out. These buildings are in Shangai and Beijing, all tier 1 cities. I agree this is not the best use of their money, but once they are leased out, at lease the revenue will be predictable. The stock should reflect this at some point.
That's why I talked to him about it. I'm not talking about smartphones, where margins are low. I'm talking about cancer treating equipment. That's where the real money is to be made.