It's ridiculous. DGLY is an obvious short. The problem now is with it benefiting with all the TASR positive news even more than TASR itself, I'm finding it hard to decide where to open my position in DGLY.
I'm long this stock, but farqtards like you are a real embarrassment. I cannot believe half the comments I read on Yahoo MBs aren't made by children.
Dafuq.... DGLY up another 10% and TASR is down on positive news? Really stinks.
Anyway, couple questions:
1. To those of you who may be thinking of shorting DGLY, what is your opinion on when might be the time to do it? I've been thinking of it for a while, but each time just when I think it might be right, it makes a big move.
2. When might you add to your position in TASR? What might you look out for? There were a couple times I have wanted to do it, but this divergence in prices compared to DGLY makes me concerned something is up with DGLY and someone in the know is making moves.
I agree... I'm sick and tired of many of my stocks going up only because of earnings. I wish more companies would strategize the dissemination of good news. Keep the price rise slow but steady.
True, I think it would be stupid to sell all. If you've got a lot maybe a defensive move would be to sell some. But the sad fact is these moves in management #$%$ investors, especailly for a stock like TASR that has gone up so fast. People buying and selling on emotion and not fundamentals cause the biggest moves in my experience.
What does irritate me is how a company like DGLY can make such disproportionately large moves on good news compared to TASR. In my estimation, TASR is the more solid bet.
No I cannot agree. Any time there is a shakeup in structure like this, price moves. That's been shown in all the shares I've owned. People may recover their minds after a while but the initial reaction is always dramatic. This makes more sense than some two bit analyst downgrade.
I have made quite alot of money on TASR since the riots broke out, and regardless of whether the news boosts my position or not, I am #$%$ and I am hoping someone can try to explain it to me. Maybe it's a cultural/local thing and I can't understand it because I'm not from the US.
I can understand that Ferguson could be one word against another, hearsay, etc BS.
But how in the BLUE FAQ can ANYONE of SOUND mind watching the video of Eric Garner's murder come to ANY OTHER conclusion that indictment is justified? How the blue hell could anyone look at the video and not come to any conclusion other than a gross miscarriage of justice has occurred here? What kind of reasoning could go behind that decision knowing that in the wake of Ferguson, any injustice can only be asking for more of the same?
I have read through as many reports of the conclusion of the trial, and I still cannot understand it.
Please give me some intelligent answers why the decision might even remotely be justified, because this result has honestly affected me more badly than losing money on stupid trades this year.
I had to laugh at that. I was like, come ON guys, everyone knows your tricks by now! What losers! They've long since lost any credibility from people in the know. Still no harm selling some to take some profits if you have a lot of shares, but don't be dumping and letting these #$%$ clients start swallowing them up. What a transparent ploy! Waiting to buy on a pullback.
Ok thanks a lot guys! Nice to have some intelligent input for a change! Just a litlte frustrating that TASR (to my reckoning anyway) is the better company but DGLY jumps 41% while we just barely scrape 10%. My regret now is not buying more when that #$%$ did his blackmail crapola on TASR and seemingly caused a brief sell off.
I was hoping one of your knowledgeable people could give me some intelligent insight.
Why has there been such a great disparity in price increase between TASR and DGLY? What advantages is DGLY perceived to have?
Thanks for your thoughts. Right now my only concern is if there will be vested interest for those in power to actually block this since it might expose more criminal actions by police. Long term though I think this is the way to go. The only risk is whether TASR will win out over competitors.
Thanks for your input, and doubtless you have good points. however that doesn't matter at all when we're talking about share price and trying to weigh all factors for and against a price rise or fall. While I think the Grand Jury decision is incredible, in the context of TASR however I was wondering if I should add to my position. Whether or not it will deter crime is one thing, but what will happen to TASR price is what I'm interested in.
Thanks mate. Appreciate your insight and reasoned input. It's hard to find intelligent thoughts on these boards these days without some knee jerk reaction. I half-expected someone to response calling me a short in disguise lol. I am thinking of adding to my position but wasn't sure what the reaction to this atrocity would be. Always hard to guess.
Thanks. What about the powers-that-be who are covering this up? Are they likely to try to block purchase of bodycams because they would expose more of these shameful acts? Of course weighing aginst this will be angry people wanting bodycams. Can the bodycam evidence be doctored in any way?