Correct....let the day traders make their couple bucks. If you believe the interim data (and there is no reason not to), the drug works. KIM, PCYC has contracted very large companies to provide Ibrut. in massive quantities and management knows a hell of a lot more than any of us.
Hey Brick...just saw your pic on "market pulse" and if legit, I apologize; you are far from a dude. But still think you are mistaken if you want to short.
Trade ....shmade!!!! Who do you think you are having to keep your sources so confidential? You are spewing junk, garbage, trash and then asking everyone to accept what you say without divulging where you came up with this #$%$. Please short this stock as you initially stated you would. Then come back and prove us longs wrong. SP drops a few bucks and you guys (or maybe it is only one guy) come out of the woodwork preaching gloom and doom. It happened at $12, then $40, then $60 and on and on. But this new ploy of using big words and painting yourself as an expert in the pharma arena with no other information, does in fact make you nothing more than a disgruntled loudmouth. I along with many others on this board are sick and tired of hearing unsubstantiated drivel. PO'ed to say the least.
COO has been in place since 2008. Please give us your credentials in more detail re: your "30 years of leadership in the pharma. industry". And what is your source when you say "I have heard that the proximate cause.......". Throwing out unsubstantiated statements does not make you credible. Give us more info about yourself and your "sources".
And with all your scatological references [POS, dmped (sic)], maybe you should consider a scat from this board...you contribute nothing.
Why is it that you only POSt when the SP is down? Your POSts have always been incorrect with their dire predictions
Geez, is it ever great when this guy crawls out of the woodwork and starts spouting off again. PCYC inevitably goes higher (and higher). Surprised he hasn't mentioned that "$72 gap" or did he? So many ridiculous posts it's hard to keep track. Love the CAPS when he is trying to make another impt. point.
PS....BTW what do you think Gilead will charge for idealisib if approved?
Incorrect pal...in a "reasonable debate" the guy who makes the statement has to offer the proof. As a supposed long, you know the Ibrut. numbers. Let Morty or you for that matter show us what you know about any of the 14 products and let us then debate. I never said the FDA designations were rubbish, but throwing them out there without any facts to back up your statement, is. Let's see some stats on any of the 14.
I never shun reasonable debate, but reasonable is the operative term here. Spewing rubbish is not a debate. Let Morty back up what he says by giving us some info about the alphabet/numerical soup he threw out. What do these drugs treat? Where are they in their development and if in later phases, give us a few stats regarding effects on disease being treated. I have neither the time nor inclination to look up all of the "stuff" he pulled out of his az.
Obviously the top of your head is quite flat. And how about changing this to "...can bridge to until patient expires". Unfortunately with your rationale, this is the more likely scenario. Please take your "helpful" thoughts elsewhere, Morty.