and you know why? cause a pump has to be primed before it can do its work, and the vast super majority of the pumpers (i call them promoters) haven't primed themselves sufficiently to get the material flowing...an uprimed pump might run just fine, a little noisy, but it does run, the only problem is without being primed the material can't get its way to the pump so it can be discharged....you make a lot of noise, but don't do anything, it's that simple...we big guns (big promoters), like me and others who stay infomed, know how to use what we know to get resuilts, and the results we've alway gotten before these new model promoters came online, was to maintain a steadily increasing pps...we step aside for a few weeks and what happens? she starts tanking....and when you examine this situation forensically, it's pretty clear where the problem lies...not in poor fundamentals, not in "bad" news, not in the market generally, but because of a failure of our new promoters to approach their calling diligently...now you can get primed if you fill yourselves in on 1. the issues 2. the rules
and 3. the facts (data and conduct by the players) ((players means washington, media, lawsuits))
but you're tryin' i guess, and we all have to take baby steps before we walk....but please hurry! we're down from $4.50 and, to be blunt, we big gun promoters may have to trump most of you if you don't do something big next week
i'll be on my yacht to nova scotia at the opening bell, but will be lurking....SHAPE UP OR SHIP OUT
even with your sheer numbers, you couldn't pump yourselves out of a wet paper bag, let alone get this stock back to $4.50...pathetic
google board has not talked about this, HOWEVER, Investors Hub did post it around 4:49 pm yesterday, so i was wrong that iHub had not posted it, my mistake (in all the excitement)
what i'm getting at is this:
we were originally predicting, both the pro and anti forces that net zero would come unitl 2015!!
yes, yes, yes! it's happening! the truth of the importance of fannie and freddie is slapping them in the face, two pillars of the american way of providing housing to its citizens...in the same manner as the SEC was formed in 1933 to stabilize and make more fair the securities "industry," Fannie as chartered in 1938 to provide fairness and honesty in the housing sector....both, and later freddie, were meant to protect the financial interests of american citizens...if you get rid of fannie and freddie, you may as well repeal the Securities and Exchange Act of 1933 and 1934 and let the banks and government feed on themselves!
i remember when we were 3 quaters away from net zero, then we made up even more so that by the next quarter we were only 1 quater away from net zero, then when that quarter came, we were OVER THE TOP!
EARLY EVER QUARTER AS WE APPROACHED NET-ZERO...! this is huge, forks...this article represents a tsunami in an already incoming tide....and this will be IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE COURTS TO IGNORE, AND IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE FHFA, TREASURY AND ADMNISTRATION TO DEFEND...
THAT ARTICLE IS outstanding, excellent capsulization of what we've been saying since march 2013...here are parts i really like:
The problem is that the government, in its desire to cut a deal with an outside investor - i.e., Blackstone - back in June 2011, seemed unconcerned about the consequences for existing shareholders.
the sweep rule itself appears motivated by something other than a desire to protect the public interest
Rescind the sweep rule and let Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac operate on their own without any too-big-to-fail government guarantee.
$5 by Friday's CLOSE! CARIMBA ARIBA BRINCA HORITO MISMO!