ounlopez.....the reason for those thumbs is that certain people reject any discussion suggesting that there may ever be an imperfect time to buy this perfect stock.
scappy.....Yes, there is nice support at 100MA. Resistance at $0.13, and also at $.14. If this thing can crack fourteen again, with volume, it's a whole new game.
risk.....How is zarc not credible? He has been open and transparent. You take what he says out of context. Take off the blinders.
ganja.....Yes, I know. And I will be eternally grateful.. Big picture, I lost a penny. I never intended to sell. AAIC and #C4CT, and following blogs, caused me to re-think the company and my investment. Having re-grouped, I feel like I need to have my arms around MANF, to claim my small piece of it, regardless of GC mishaps. I may or may not sell again.
ounlopez.....A good point, as the stock kissed the line today and immediately settled back. But I believe, at this price point, support is stronger than resistance. Also, I intend to hold through near term developments. As for Clay, I am familiar with him. I believe he separates himself a bit by not being a bombastic clown, like most of those guys are.
risk.....Indeed, I did lose (quite) a few bucks on this trade. And looking back on it, I know quite well what I did wrong. But you are one who should think twice before asking me what goes into my trades. It's over your head.
risk.....You can take jabs at my trading all you want. It makes no difference to me. In fact, I find it quite amusing. I know where I stand with the market, as I have done quite well. One could practically throw darts at a board during this last economic cycle, and still be up. But I do take issue at you calling me a liar. I'd like to see you give reference to one lie that I have told. As per Gerald, I have taken two shots at him. One) The day following the 40% haircut, he said that the #CT4T was not directed at the investment community. I challenge anyone to defend him on that one. That was a completely wack claim. 2) I thought that his explanation of a how a reverse split would not cause dilution, was spin to divert us from the dilutive prospects of two billion additional shares. So, you try to slander me by calling me a liar. Remember that any intelligent person will consider the source.
Giving guidance before an official announcement revealing a legitimate partner makes zero sense. Even then, it would be premature. Guidance should not be given until CLIA approval. They're getting ahead of themselves...
..."We believe our Alzheimer's blood test will generate $30M in top line revenue in calendar year 2015. Oh, and we're still ironing out the final negotiations with our prospective laboratory partner. That should be done in the very near future".....
goinglong51.....Much appreciated.. For the record, I don't know how to do those things either. This is just a hobby.
ounlopez.....Absolutely. You will not catch me having a panic attack over one imperfect trade.
ganja.....Nothing yet. We shall see soon enough whether I made the right or wrong decision.
Of course, the head I'm looking at is $0.1960. Anyways, thanks for the input. As I said, I ain't no expert on the subject. Just kinda tripped on it, and thought it worth looking at, if just a bit.