Relax, I've been on this board for a couple of years now and I have been alerted to many good pieces of information and news through the board.....always checked by my own DD of course. I was only stating that you can't just take the word of someone on the board because, in this circumstance they say CLDX is a better technology. I can say what I want for team long and someone else can say what they want for team short.....at the end of the day the proof will be in the pudding as they say! GLTA
Sentiment: Strong Buy
I'm sorry but could you please enlighten us as to why you believe that CLDX is best of breed? Are you comparing the clinical data or simply giving us your opinion based on...........nothing?? Only phase 3 data will tell us what is best of breed or what works and what doesn't work, certainly not a bunch of yahoo's on a msg board!! (haha get it.....yahoo's)! GLTA-Longs
Very well put. I'm long NWBO and thinking of taking a long position in IMUC. Well funded and I think the news has been interpreted incorrectly. PFS was 3 months and I bet you will see extension in OS when you give the tail end responders some time to ffect the mean OS. In the 64 events, how do you know that the ratio isn't exactly what the study is.....2-1 and that the 2 deaths were not the subset of the group that don't respond to ICT........all the remaining survivors could be ICT control group. This will play out favorably in the next 6 months and move to a PIII for IMUC. IMO
Pump and Dump orchestrated by who? This isn't the OTC nor are we talking about a penny pumping newsletter. Who do think is was pumping and dumping? No institutional or insider trading so I guess it was the news team at fox? hahaha This was sold because of IMUC data.........do you even know what a pump and dump is? lol
You flip flop like a fish out of water pal........yes you did mention Yu blowing out his shares but you also sung another tune of how much better IMUC was vs NWBO. You are a self serving weasel that we have caught posting under numerous aliases in an effort to make a few pennies. We hear nothing about your trades until the markets have moved. No doubt you were that little geek in high school that jerk*d off on chat boards cause you were too scared to leave the house. You're an internet troll that would probably cower in a situation of real conflict in the real world. Keep slinging insults you sociopath piece of s**t!!
I couldn't care on what side of the fence anyone sits on here, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, good or bad. But when you are a proven liar that posts BS falsities in an effort to move a stock price, you are a worthless waste of space.
hahahah this is hystarical, Yahoo should only allow posters to post under 1 IP address. Does anyone realize that all of these so called short posters are probably 1-2 actual posters....hahaha What idiot would avoid a security based on what someone said on a msg board??
So what do you think the selling and decrease in SP is today? It has nothing to do with anything you have posted, the only reason is the IMUC trial, correct? Yes, and how many times have you told us what a great story IMUC is and that you are long? Yes you are on the right side of a short trade, if you actually have a position and held it (you said you were going to cover a while ago), but where will you be when it starts rising again like when it shot to 6.50......you only appeared after it started falling.
Who's holding the bag? We are seeing a by product of panic selling for IMUC. Now that I have heard the CC I believe the selling is unwarranted and thus unwarranted here. In addition, NWBO tech is different and so are is the primary end points. Still up from over a month ago dummy.
Conference was yesterday, Dec 11th as per the IMUC website. Another coffee may be in order! lol Just joking MT!
Conference Call Today - Dec 11th, 2013
ImmunoCellular is holding a conference call and webcast today at 5:00 pm ET to discuss the ICT-107 phase II results. The call will be hosted by Andrew Gengos, President and CEO.
LIVE CALL: (877) 853-5636 (toll-free)
Conference code: 23984187
REPLAY: (855) 859-2056 (toll-free)
Conference code: 23984187
(Replay available from Wednesday, December 11, 2013 at 8:00 pm ET until Tuesday, December 17, 2013 at 11:59 pm ET.)
Very well put Rational! When did this study start? If I understand correctly, they are showing a 3 month increase in OS this early, then as the trial progresses the numbers should move in a favorable direction for IMUC. Especially if 21 patients have not even progressed. Were all 124 treated with ICT 107?
The stock is still up over the last month for most of us longs you meatball. Market cap is up. IMUC doesn't equal NWBO and this is merely panic selling. Honestly how many aliases do you post under? At least try to change the immature nature of your communication to be believable. If you are older then your early 20's, I would take a good hard look in the mirror and realize what a loser you've grown into.
Didn't anyone take the insider selling since May as a sign? Everyone on their Board and Executive Team have been selling for quite a while......big sign!
Thanks for the reply and clarification. That being said, with a study like this the number IMO could then be skewed with certain patients that had very low OS or very long OS. It would be interesting to know when the median OS was figured out for the NWBO 33 patient study? If it has been allowed to carry on, then the 2 patients that have survived beyond 10 years would have a drastic affect on the median OS, correct? I would actually like to toss out the top and bottom 10% to figure out mean as this would be a more likely result. My concern is that they keep talking about OS of 38 months (from memory) but this could obviously be much lower for the average patient and in a trial that doesn't last as long.
Probably a dumb question but how did they figure out the median OS for the 33 patients in the NWBO trial? Do they take all the patients and then divide it by the total OS months for all?
Sooo the .40 cents you lost was manageable but another .20 cents down to 3.95 would have been a blood bath?? haha
TO THE BOARD - Do you know how to tell that someone is using aliases to try and muster up respect, when two posters start stroking eachother with an obvious short motive....case in point "fins"!
It all depends on the time frame and goal for your investment. If you are looking to flip and trade then I would wait to find some support, otherwise I would lock in now. As Chess has stated, i think we could re-test $3.50, but I also think that news could be released at any point that could send this sky rocketing. It's a long shot but the DMC could look at the data and forgo the rest of the trial if the results are compelling. Because of this and because of the gains that would be had in that case, I am not willing to have zero exposure to the company, even if it means small paper losses.
Once again, incorrect information. Sabby still listed with substantial holdings and institutional holdings are up substantially as well. I agree about the stock and warrant offers as it allows anyone a free bet on NWBO.......but to say that they are all blowing out their stock is incorrect! Market Cap has increased while stock has remained in range all year, that's not too bad in my books!
Haha That's where you get it wrong Chess, I don't hate anybody regardless of what they think of me. I hate the way you perpetuate incorrect information in many of your posts to self serve your long or short position, I hate that you sling around insults like an immature child, I hate that you talk as though you know and everyone else doesn't, I hate that we have caught you using different aliases...which really calls into question your purpose here, but i certainly don't hate you. Happy Holidays and GLTA
What NWBO officers blew out their stock? None, they have bought not sold! It was IMUC officers you idiot! hahahahaha
But you said it was a sell at 3.10........hahahaha
PS You're aliases are confusing you again.....for everyone that doesn't know Ches =Supersip=Mark = 100 more aliases!!