Just for your info Dancer Man and your new SB little lackey hack minion ID (whom is probably otis), I did not give you the thumbs down on this post thus proving there are other posters who believe that you are full of it.
" They will sample the margins and cut until pathology gives them a clearance. I don't see why they will find a 3-D application all that alluring."
To prevent having a patient coming in for a second surgery and saving them from the pain and anguish from it?
" keep exaggerating capt."
Exaggerating? Would you like for me to go back and pull up some of your BK post going back to 2010?
I think that it is quite amusing Dancer Man in how your little lackey hack minions jump on the band wagon for you like some sort of validation and stroke your ego. Most or all of them operating under multiple IDs like brookeoldjoo (A.K.A. black.otis). They me Dancer Mann, why is it necessary for your SB little lackey hack minions to operate under so many aliases? Could it possibly be to convince new readers to the board that the great Fncydansir has a huge following? I can think of a number of posters on this board who believe otherwise and I can assure you that they are not me operating under multiples.
As far as the BK stuff goes, as I have been telling you and much to your dismay, it's in the value of the machine and the smart money people probably see something in it. Just like Broadfin who you erroneously posted on this board that they had pulled the plug before checking your facts. Just like you posted that posters agreed that Miss Crane just had a high school education before checking your facts. So what does this tell us Dancer Man, that you basically post up B.S. in your bashing prior to checking your facts?
"The capt edits out the part of my quote stating "in the absence of" or "baring clarity" and then says I need to apologize."
Tell me Dancer Man, what's the difference between your little lackey hack minion statement
"to attend (not graduate from) MIT."
Greg, you have made several libelous statements about me."
""clarity, it is generally agreed upon that mela is being run by a high school graduate." Fncydansir
If you want to talk about "baring clarity", perhaps you should do a little research prior to your bashing.
"My question revolves around the thought if the company files BK and someone else buys them thereafter; what happens to the shareholders' shares as they are technically part owners of the company? BK generally eliminates or restructures debt. It is very possible that the current lenders have a non-dischargeable debt clause which makes the question even more compelling.
I suppose that if a company bought mela prior to BK and wished to take it private, they would simply pay off the current shareholders whatever the current market price per share is at the time and be done with it. '
Your speculation on what will happen if they file is about as relevant as the number of times that you have predicted it. NADA!
As I tried to point out to you Dancer Man, they had a public conference this morning. Still trying to verify the stock float that Dwoods posted but that would explain the drop today, now wouldn't it? Not something that you want to hear about, gives them a couple of more quarters before you can squawk your BK bull.
"Fncy, what is going on?? What happened to the sinister diabolical genius we all loved and feared?
"What has happened?"
He is coming to the light side of the force. May the MELA force be with hm.
"(*Texas, of course is not quite Eastern Standard Time)"
With your trouble with time zones, how would you know?
I still do believe that it was a mistake to go in initially based on faulty intel. My point is that Hilliary and Kerry were looking at the same intel as Bush. As was Blair however, as I pointed out in the previous post, they had some valid reasons to believe that Saddam did possess chem weapons.
The point is, once the mistake was made to go in, Bush was correct in not pulling the plug entirely and leaving a power vacuum for terrorist to come back in. In Obama's defense, he probably had no idea that the Iraqi army would simply cave and fold like it did.
I think the major short players who attack the small biotechs try to break them down to the point of picking them up for a song. A short blogger who has attacked this company has also attacked MELA to the point of out right hearsay misinformation. Amazing that the SEC lets them get away with that cr@p.
You guys amaze me in how you conveniently leave out that Hilliary and Kerry both voted for that war looking at the same intelligence. In addition, the numerous collation partners, especially Blair relying on British intelligence.
Lets look at some facts. 1)Saddam had displayed outright aggression with his invasion of Kuwait. 2) He also had displayed his possession of chemical weapons and willingness to use them against the Kurds and the Iranians during his war with Iran.
I'm guessing that a lot of the chemical weapons that Assad had could be traced back to Iraq. Saddam probably flushed them from his territory just prior to Bush launching the fleet.
Getting back to the original topic once the mistake was made in going in the first place. Bush was correct in his 2007 assessment in justifying his build up for the surge. Everything he said has come true and even the liberal press is now acknowledging that.
""*When given a real world example of a physician and why he will not use melafind, the capt resorts to professional slander and questions the guys' morals"
How can you slander someone who is an unknown?
By your own admission, the guy is a cash cow junkie when it comes to questionable moles who doesn't refer to a professional until after he gets his little piece of the pie.
"*It is organized crime and their Basher legions who have stolen all my investment money."
I don't know about organized crime but a major short player? Perhaps.
And when I say major, I mean major, not some peon like you.
"*The Bashers call melafind a toy and so, that effects the way the world sees the device."
I seriously doubt that lying bashers on a MB have any bearing on a pps.
"*When it is shown that his own derm is breaking the law by allowing his staff to use the machine, the capt finds all manner of rationalization to say it is OK for him to do so."
Been there, done that, still waiting for those "folks" that you said would be contacting me MR BLOWHARD. 8)
"*When given a real world example of a physician and why he will not use melafind, the capt resorts to professional slander and questions the guys' morals"
Are you referring to your GP bud who is not qualified to presently use the machine?
"A physician buddy and I just spent the past week riding our horses into the high country of the eastern Sierra Nevada Mountains to camp and fly fish the high lakes. One the way home yesterday, we stopped in at the Totem restaurant in Loan Pine for lunch.
My buddy pulls out his iPhone to check his stocks as we have been out of communication with the civilized world and he wanted to check what the Market has been up to while we were gone. I asked him if he had ever heard of Mela Sciences and the Melafind. He is a senior partner at a very big, respected and successful medical practice in Los Angeles but yet, he had never heard of the company or its product.
Without interjecting any personal bias into the conversation, I explained what Melafind was, how much it cost and the profit the physician received for a scan. I swear to God, this was his exact response to me:
"Why in the world would any physician use something like this?" The reasons:
* Why would I spend thousands of dollars on a medical device that I have to maintain?
*Why would I give up (on average depending on the lesion size) $189 for a biopsy for a $25 scan?
*If I biopsy and the diagnosis is incorrect, the lab assumes the liability. If I use the scanner and the diagnosis is incorrect, I assume most of the liability.
And my favorite comment:
* (as a general practitioner) It does not make financial or clinical sense for me to refer a patient to a dermatologist simply because he has a suspicious mole. I simply biopsy the lesion, spend fifty sense for a disposable scalpel and receive nearly $200 for the service. You think I am going to give up that billing code for a $25 profit? If the biopsy comes back positive THEN I will refer to a dermatologist." Fncy Jul 16. 2013
"He has signed posters of Verm and Fncy."
They may come in handy someday if I ever run out of toilet paper.
They were three brave men who risk it all to serve their country. Have you ever been in the military Pilo?
I have no reason to doubt their integrity. Keep telling yourself that there is nothing there.