Since there is, and will not be, any systemic pressure on labour supply for another4-10 years, what are you saying? Granted, it's highly unlikely that you actually know, but do you even have a clue? Or did the madrassah take away your directions to the clue bus?
missed, Other than a continued display of you and your Weiner being posted all over the net, why is "Oprah" less "deserving than the proto-fascist BRit Thatcher, or Lucille Ball?
AS I look for a cultural context where you have the basic skills to function--Bugs Bunny cartoons--it is obvious " What a maroon" was meant for you.
" we may see resumption of real median income growth for the American consumer, " Not until all of HC's bussies who want US wages dropped to Chinese levels are taken out.
Not until the welfare queens stop living off the seed corn of infrastructure and start replanting it as a crop.
Of course megatrends are "real". So are shorter term tends.
What isn;t "real" is the utility of the whining welfare queens.
You're a decade or so late in noticing that. StateSt or somebody will sell you an ETF consisting solely of tickers where "buy backs" actually reduce the o/s, and another made of both types.
The idea of a "wall" is a headgame by gameboys looking for roadkill. Something you consistently show yourself to be.
1. " Who's got that kind of money to throw around for a lunch and #$%$ chat???" In a "free market" with no welfare queens anybody has something to trade for the information.
2.. Who says he'll answer any tough questions, or even honestly???"
He and the people who have paid for such lunches.over a multi-year sample.
What you "hope" means nothing to anyone.
"buying an hour of time it will be with pam or jenna, not uncle.
So then you need a business plan that will get you there. That plan will include a "no whining about no gimmes", because for sure whoever pam and jenna are, they are not in the freebie business either.
missed, Or you and HC could stop being welfare queens and buy an hour of WB's time and ask him whatever you want.
IF the likes of Snowden and the Navy Yars shooter--that is, the private sector--were kept out of it, around 85% of what it did with a far, far greater degree of efficiency and granularity, allowing capitalist, not oligarchical, insurance companies to prosper.
Frist, thanx for the data source. SEcond, yeah, that's true. But it appears to me that the "growth" for 1/2 aq century consisted largely of using the free cash flow of GEICO to ensure that "cash" which just lays there until utilised, was traded for equity in operations either temporarily distressed, or themselves hacving a lock on some amount of free cash flow, like razor blades, soft drinks, and burgers. To me it's worth noting that WB's unforced error in shedding MCD in 98 or so was caused because he saw it as a real estate play that paid for itself with location cash flow. As the "franchise" model took over, he saw the real estate gain potential on the books as overvalued.
As hard as it can be for the likes of you and I to remember, "bsuinbesses are about doing stuff."
Good job of showing that BTX is back "get welfare" as a biz plan.
Anyone following the UK bio sector knows its being squeezed harder than the NIH.
Because " if you know you can grow book at 7 % plus over time" is utterly false, except in the Madrassaah.
looking, I just read a piece in LRB that asked--in re the UK, but the same applies here--"Given the scale of disasters "business" has created for itself over the past decade, why on earth would anyone want government to be more like business?" And the clear answer is--"So big financial houses can raid government more efficiently."
"The GATES F is now selling about 25 million shs a year, the other foundations combined another 5 million or so, " Source for that?
So now WB shows up as a talking head, to compete with Cramer's bosses, to keep demand stable, and further commoditise the stock.
To me a better wuestifon is, under a very overdo FUD correction is retail more likely to make withdrawals from "BRK free" funds, withdraw across the board, or just begin to work towards not being road kill, and lose the "picks" and the "tips" out of their ports?
And DO remember, WB plays for WB, not retail, not "the mkt" or "the economy."
Ahhh. you fell for the sales pitch... Like many things---missed's brain comes to mind as an example--the original idea was sound: How quant terms of succession? Then of course, How game them? leading to "The game is the point, f*** the assets and succession" as best exaplified then and now by Icahn.
There's an amusing discussion of the trip in Barbarians at the Gate, which may be said to now live on as a so-called "meme", the poser Norsemen in CApital One ads.
Just as there are 2 sides to a trade, is America being "mortgaged"--or are the special people "liberating value"? Once you figure out that "value" is always assigned, you can get a handle on the game.
As a speculator it's first your job to assess the likelihood of $100 oil.
As an evident member of what HC calls the brk madrassah, you will no doubt find many a way to say that $100 is too far below iv, so you have a lock.
" Obama promised folks wouldn't lose their health care," No- He never fricking promised that dead beats buying substandard insurance from conmen based on the hedge of getting a bailout from Cobra and Medicaid would not have to get over it and belly up. According to Business Week, that's about 2.5% of "presently insured." And it was stated from the outset that this would be part of the re-arrangement of risk/benefit.
Did he try to sell ther plan by stressing that? No.
How get to single payer? Easy. Too easy. Tax insurance co profits at 105%, as a mandated predator tax.
Simple legislation that any substance regulated by the FDA will be have the Treasury negotiating the price--closer to what Canada does.
Notice how all thus screaming and ranting is covering up the fact that Obamacare limits profit margins to insurance companies? That's why you are hearing about it.
NONE of this stuff is difficullt. It only takes people wanting to line up for something besides the chance to lick the Weiners of the self-appointed .
I think you're overloaded, but you're consistent with some of the type advisors in the field.
"What cancellations is he talking about, I thought there weren't meant to be any???"
Probably the illegal ones that werer talked abocut here last week.
THere's a simple, small government cure: arrest every single person in the loop from deciding to break the law to mailing the letters. Book them for extortionterroristic threatening and fraud. Put them in genpop and then start interrogating them, one on one, and see how much they roll over to get deals for reduced sentencing.
Then get rid of the burdensome regulation of searching visitors, inmates or cells for weapons.