The "medical investment group" actually is some guy with his dog Go-Fetch sitting by his side with his leash in his mouth, and his two goldfish in a bowl next to his keyboard while he hacks out his analysis.
Okay I made the mistake of wasting time responding to someone that is obsessed with dwelling on a negative article, that will not happen anymore from me.
What matters to me is BAXTER.
Baxter will absolutely transform Rockwell.
And you are missing my point, we can not control what the stupid people of the world do, you can't make sense to stupid people, that's why we call them stupid.
The people that AF talked into selling I'd be willing to bet are daytraders, and would sell on the news anyhow, with their already leaving, that removes selling pressure on the actual release of the positive news.
Native Americans have a name for the AF's of the world, they call them Walking Eagles, because they are too full of $ hit to fly.
And the ball in this game is.......BAXTER.
This is not the time to have amnesia.
These vomit writers are doing their best to block BAXTER from your memory.
And it seems to be working.
Actually maybe they do know more than BAXTER...........ya think ? !
If you recall the CEO saying that the FDA had input into the design, you would regard someone's comment here more reliable than that ?
You got your information from the top, there is no higher than the top.
And if you notice, the more recent hit piece is just plagiarizing some of AF's vomit.
Yeah thanks for the advice, you might want to take a look while you're there at "paper losses"
Here I'll save you the trouble.
"DEFINITION of 'Paper Profit (Paper Loss)'
Unrealized capital gain (or capital loss) in an investment. It is calculated by comparing the market price of a security to the original purchase price. Gains or losses only become realized when the security is sold."
just_me_over_here_again...... Thank you for proving my exact point !
You yourself said......."I was holding some INVN the other day, and I sold it before earnings. It subsequently dropped 24% after hours today due to bad earnings. If you are seriously saying that I would not have lost if I held on to it, you are a fool. By selling, I preserved my capital."
Okay genius.....................HOW did you preserve your capital?
I'll answer for you because you have very clearly demonstrated how thick you are............You hit the SELL button !
You need to take some remedial reading lessons, because nobody here told you to hold onto any stock, we very simply told you that the ACTUAL loss or profit does not occur until you SELL , daily fluctuations are NOT an actual loss or profit.
You have to SELL to create one or the other !
jayess65 Aren't you assuming that everyone in the market knows all that goes on in the stock market, and even know who the hell Cornelious Vanderbilt is ?
When you started out in kindergarten did you blast the teacher with , $hit teach , everybody knows that ?
just_me_over_here_again Do you realize just how ridiculous you are making yourself appear ? During the course of any trading day gains and losses can occur every five minutes, back and forth all day, or your stock can close up for the day, or down for the day........ UNTIL you sell, neither is a gain,or a loss.
When you file your income taxes, do you give your accountant the daily closing prices for all the days of the year and expect that to affect your capital gains or losses ? Even though you may STILL own the stock?
While you own a stock the price is NOT static, it FLUCTUATES. It is really amazing to see inside the heads of some people in the stockmarket and what their interpretation of it is
Your particular interpretation of it is.........ludicrous.
To begin with you are dwelling on a what if situation, what if the stock went to zero, or whatever?
Gee do you think anybody here is not aware what our situation would be if that were the case ?
We is all dummies,and you are the only one here with a scintilla of brain matter that gets what's going on ?
A PAPER loss or gain is NOT actual, until you hit the SELL button .
And I still think you will not get this scenario.
And I do expect an even more ridiculous comeback explanation from you.
Do a search on "Cramer Manipulation" and see just what kind of people they allow to give "financial advice" on these financial business shows , and actually make them a star in this particular investment world, and also get an idea just what kind of people they allow to write financial articles on WIDELY followed internet sites.
Bear in mind Cramer is giving this interview to The Street.......the same EXACT people that AF "writes" for.
Google 'Cramer Manipulation', this video has been around for quite awhile, and it's getting pretty haggard looking by now, but you still can very plainly see whose side the Cramer's and AF's of the world are on.
rxkell Likewise the bellyaching whiners are also easily spotted.
Some of them are sometimes actually NOT long the stock........just here to break down the moral of real longs.
There are some posters here (not I) that could bury AF with real facts, pay attention to those posters, and to hell with what the nosepicker AF vomits.
rxkell Was a 7% down day catastrophic for you ? So last Friday was the end of the world for you ? We will never recover that 7% and.......................much MORE ?!
Look beyond the end of your nose.
Are you aware that stocks...........................FLUCTUATE ?
In answer to your question, no I do not sweat a 7% drop, when I know a near term 50% pop could be at hand.
You are the kind that AF targets. Hand wringing fretters.
Oh woe is me.
btech In his scare article did you click on where he says "Full Disclosure", open that up and see how he is flip-flopping now.
Are you supposed to believe his opinion of Triferic then, or now ?
His "articles" go with the flow, depending on which way he and his friends and relatives happen to be at any given time in the stock, long, or short.
Right now with an expected positive event fast approaching, they would like to be long.........BUT, at a discount.
Do yourself a favor and click on his "Full Disclosure" included in the article. Or the sentence right following it that he has underlined. He and his associates still LIKE the stock just as much as they did in his FIRST article, but they'd LOVE it, at a cheaper price.
rxkell How does casting doubt cause any trouble for any of us longs ?
Doubt does not change facts, the only longs that the doubt causes trouble for are those that should have not been here in the first place.
They are those that believe there is a bogeyman.
The 7% drop was caused by those that are very easily duped, there will always be an abundance of those in the world, and the numbers are growing daily.......and the sorrowful thing about that is, besides being tricked into selling their stock.....they are also allowed to vote.
Therefore the bigger trouble we are ALL in.
There is one MAJOR difference now than there was then..........it's called BAXTER.
Those that sold because of someone bashing or giving THEIR negative slant on something.........are NOT mindful at their time of panic of........BAXTER.
Back then.....................is not NOW !
Why would anybody even begin to take seriously an opinion of this nosepicker against ALL other medical opinions ?
Who the hell is he ?
If you want to get a look inside this guy's head, do a search on his first and last name and twitter. He is non-stop twittering. A... F......... twitter. I tried posting earlier today, but it got rejected, that's why I don't spell his name out.
Actually the guy is a glorified message board poster. And he does comment on what people say about him on these message boards from time to time.
It would be $2ish.
I doubt there are that many weak holders left now, which makes for much better upside action when the good news comes.
Nov 6th will be the start of it.
AF's FIRST opinion on 9/6/13 was correct, and he knows it.
His now phoney second GUESSING is garbage, and he also knows that.
In his new NOW article click on the sentence that is UNDERLINED that says....."I was once more bullish about Triferic" , then look at what a phoney this guy really is. It will open this up....
"I like the Rockwell Medical story. Administering small doses of maintenance iron to patients via the dialysate used during the hemodialysis procedure makes a lot of sense, more so than waiting for a patient's iron stores to be depleted and replacing it all at once with a large IV iron infusion.
Rockwell believes SFP, if approved, will be a superior and safer method for maintaining hemoglobin levels in kidney dialysis patients. By switching to SFP, dialysis centers will reduce costs because use of IV iron and ESAs (Amgen's Epogen) will decrease. I want to hear more of the Rockwell/SFP bear story -- I'm sure it exists -- but until then, the company's pitch for the potential of SFP is really compelling.