Maybe we should get back to discussions about the sector and company. Bashers have taken over the message board. Now people are engaged in discussions about them and their few negative topics.This was their exactly their intentions to begin with, meaning they permeated the message board with worthless topics to destroy the message board while distracting investors from the important issues and news about the sector.
If people try to have a meaningful conversation about the company or sector, they will start bashing more, with unsolicited negative posts, to disrupt the continuity of the discussion and board. This is what they do for a living.....
Maybe you should not promote other OTC stocks on this message board. Owning one or two stocks on the OTC market is likely enough for most investors. I would not advise investors to buy too many OTC stocks.This is a risky market, especially for new investors who do not know how to do their due diligence or research on these companies. Owning one or two of these stocks is enough.
Maybe we should get back to discussion about the news in sector and company instead of negative topics from people who claim they don't like either of them. .
Still waiting for you to explain the metrics. My popcorn is running low here, so can you get a move on it.
Maybe you order the LT-512 and spend more time doing something else beside trying to agitate others on message boards. Face it, you are so afraid that this stock will spike to leave you on the sideline scratching your head. Where is your website. It is easy to sit the bench while playing Monday night football. You are still avoiding the issue: Explain to us would you know about evaluating the metrics. What do you know about business period. For all we know, you could be a 10 year old trying to give investment advice and opinions on a message board.
For entertainment, explain the business aspects and metrics of this company. For your information, Asians have a lot of aphrodisiacs on the market.
Oh my, who is spending all their time watching a pink stock gem: Chubbs. If it this were a TV show, this stock would have very good ratings. Even the people who claim they don't like it are watching the LATF show everyday. With your every post, the ratings should go up.
I really don't follow AMBS, so I will not comment much on the metrics. I am sure the person in question meant no harm by his post. He was really just describing diversification of his portfolio. You are right, I really don't know much about AMBS. At a glance, LATF metrics seems better than it. I always said that investors will have MJ companies to the bio tech sector for a better picture of valuations.
Comparing the two: AMBS does not generate any revenues and it has a higher cash burn than LATF. The market cap is also much higher at about $100 million while LATF is at about $20 million. Both companies have no long term debt to speak of in their capital structures ( neither are leveraged firms) but AMBS has a much bigger operating expense. LATF also has the near-term advantage because it is generating revenue from its seafood business.
I am sure our poster meant no harm to AMBS shareholders.
Are you really serious. Your logic for posting negative comments on this message boards does not even make any sense. If you bought this stock in 06/2013 for .007 cent, you could have sold it in 2014 for over a penny. Also, there were not a lot of posts about LATF on the message board in question. One post does not justify you going off the deep in on this message. You also do not even show many posts relate to LATF prior 07/21/2014. Your post history during 2013 does not even mention this stock at all correct me if this is wrong).
Also, show us the post from the AMBS board that you claimed made you so upset. LATF also has much better metrics than AMBS and a lot less downside. It really looks like you mention AMBS on the LATF message board in hopes to rotate potential buyers into that stock. Chances are you are long on it.
Also, you are wasting our time over $400. People play that amount on lottery tickets over one year. Your behavior is also becoming a common pattern on these message boards, meaning posters making claims of being past or current shareholders while sticking around to bash companies. I have traded many companies stocks over the years. I can't remember ever wanting to waste my time to post negative comments about any of them after exit the trades. Why would I, this is not personal.
Pete the bum,
You are avoiding the issue. I ask you to explain the company metrics. I really don't think you know anything about finance, accounting, business or valuations. Anyone can bash price everyday. Show us what you really know here. I read your past posts and nothing in them suggest you even know anything about business.
Tell us about the metrics of this company. You also would not be here if you knew how to predict stock prices. Give us a break! If it goes higher, do you promise to climb back into your little slimy hole from where you emerged from. I predict you will be in serious trouble or facing prison time before the year is out. Don't sweat (short) the small stuff.
You should be happy you that someone is even communicates with you on this board. Most people are long here. How many people have you forced yourself on in your life.
I am leaning towards the more conservative number of about $50 million right now. With better management of the company, I believe the valuation could be much higher. My investment time horizon is much long than some on this board too. I'll be watching the trend lines over the next few years. One year is not enough data to really get a true future valuation of this company. I have also been accumulating shares on the price dips, so I have not been too concerned with the current valuation.
Note too: I made early money in this sector, so I have not really lost anything here. I'll stay conservative on valuation until the company provides us better numbers on its MJ business. Right now the markets are only placing value on its seafood business.
Well, at least you are finally admitting that you need help, the first step in your recovery program. You now have something against people who work at Taco Bell. So, you are a well to do person who came to this message board to talk down to others. Your screen name should be urabum not bumr8.
My name is bumr8 and I want to get rich by shorting a stock that trades for .0035 cent. Boys, we have live one here!
Looks like a little bit more than you get paid for bashing stocks on message boards. In your country that is like a lot of money. You're on this company because you think it is a Fortune 500 company. Let us see: $178 is about 2,060,000 in your currency. You are rich! You know what to buy with that type of money and it is not tacos either.
bumr8 • Dec 6, 2012 6:14 PM
SQNM HALTED!!!!!!!! News pending.....
nice news for the AM.........would that make everyone happy?
olkincord • Dec 7, 2012 5:40 AM
Someone could report you to the SEC for posting false information. I'd be careful what I say on a message board.
From my research looks like you have been trying to run various cross-border scams for a while. Lets see: Hacking computers, bogus sites, short and distort scams and the list likely goes on. Someone should report you to the SEC.
You nail it. Sandsw91 and bumr8 are both scam artists. One is mad because he got removed from a site for doing the same thing. He also has a very serious problem. I doubt he even bought shares in this company. He does not even have money or a job to buy this stock. This is why can afford to spend all day and night posting negative comments. His real obsession is with someone on this board who found out that he had a very serious problem. Now he trying to stalk someone's trades on YAHOO message boards. Your post is alluding to the real problem ( it is serious).
I keep telling the guy to take his medications and move on.
You must not have any kind of life or friends. How can you spend all your time posting negative comments about this company. If you are a minor, you really need to get out more to start socializing with your peers. You are on this board about 18 hours a day. Since you have been a member, 80 percent of your negative posts have been on this company. Sounds like you are obsessed with this company or someone on this board. Question: You don't see anything wrong with this picture?
How much time do you spend posting negative comments about this this company. How many screen names do you actually have to post the same old nonsense. I beginning ti think you have a serious problem or you are a hard core criminal. A reasonable person would spend this much time posting negative comments about a stock that trades for .0035. Maybe we should ask this question: How old are you? I am guessing about 16 years old.
It puzzle me as to why some people would be so concerned about whether or not other investors make money on their investments. The issue does not even concern them unless they borrowed from these investors accounts. Only scam artists trying to con investors out of their money would spend all day posting negative comments about someone else's investments or money. The, "Pure answer", stop worrying about other people's money. The trade off: The time wasted worrying about other's investments could spent on their own stock portfolios.
With thousands of negative posts from boiler room short and distort scam artists who claim they have no motive for posting all their negative posts, I wonder who is on crack.
Do you follow any other company. You are wasting your life away posting negative comments day and night about this company. You need to take your meds and get some sleep (or something) instead of developing a unhealthy relationship to this stock. Try getting a girl friend to spend more time with before you go nuts.
Now you understand why I said not to buy into that reverse split argument. I suspected that shorts would complain about that stock and regulators would likely halt it. I am surprised they do not use the negative story to create more problems for the sector. Someone is making money on convincing regulators halt stocks.