Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

ZIOPHARM Oncology, Inc. Message Board

beautifuldaytobike 11 posts  |  Last Activity: May 17, 2016 9:42 AM Member since: Feb 26, 2007
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • beautifuldaytobike beautifuldaytobike May 17, 2016 9:42 AM Flag

    10 years. It'll be a different world --- and may not happen. All that glitters....

  • beautifuldaytobike by beautifuldaytobike May 17, 2016 9:33 AM Flag

    In a sweeping blow to Wall Street investment giants, the U.S. Supreme Court today unanimously allowed lawsuits against "naked" short sellers in state courts to proceed.

    The high court ruled unanimously that shareholders are not confined to federal court when seeking recourse for securities violations. Granting “due deference to the important role of state courts,” the Court reinforced federalist principles while clarifying congressional intentions to limit the federal government’s role.

    The ruling, which could give a new boost to startups and small companies targeted by short sellers, showed a rare moment of ideological agreement in the court. Justice Elena Kagan authored the Court’s opinion, and Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, issued a concurrence.

    In 2012, businessman Greg Manning sued Merrill Lynch and other financial institutions in New Jersey state court for purposefully devaluing his company through systematic “naked” short-selling — a term used to describe selling a stock a seller does not own and has not borrowed. In standard short sales, traders either borrow a stock or make sure that it can be borrowed prior to selling it short in the hope that its value will fall before the transaction must be covered.

    The practice has come under increasing scrutiny and has been banned in Germany and other major economies.

    Manning, the CEO of the memorabilia company Escala Group, Inc., owned two million shares of the company, which formerly traded on the NASDAQ and is now known as Spectrum Group International, Inc.

    Manning’s claims against the financial institutions include the New Jersey Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act along with common-law claims for unjust enrichment, interference with economic advantage and contractual relations, breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and negligence. Today’s ruling will allow Manning to have his day in New Jersey state court.

    “Respondents allege that ‘[t]he SEC has expressly noted that naked short selling involves the omission of a material fact' as part of their state-law securities fraud allegation,” Thomas wrote in his concurrence. "Vindicating that claim would not require the enforcement of a federal duty or liability. New Jersey law encompasses fraudulent conduct that does not necessarily rest on a violation of federal law or regulation.”

    The ruling comes amid increasing scrutiny of the controversial practice at local and federal levels. After the 2008 financial correction, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) tightened regulation of short-selling.

    "False rumors can lead to a loss of investor confidence," the commission reported at the time. "Such loss of investor confidence can lead to panic selling, which may be further exacerbated by ‘naked’ short-selling. As a result, the prices of securities may artificially and unnecessarily decline well below the price level that would have resulted from the normal price discovery process. If significant financial institutions are involved, this chain of events can threaten disruption of our markets.”

    Manning isn’t the first to claim investment firms colluded to devalue his company’s stock. In 2007, internet retail giant Overstock.com Inc. argued financial institutions deliberately schemed to devalue shares through naked short sales. Although Overstock faced similar jurisdictional hurdles throughout a nine-year battle, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corporation eventually settled RICO and securities fraud claims with the company.

    While legitimate short-selling remains an accepted financial practice, manipulation by false rumors and naked short-selling has taken a serious toll on emerging industries. Biotechnology industry insiders have for years pleaded with the SEC to block the illegal short selling and false whisper campaigns that plague the industry. Smaller technology-driven companies frequently lack the resources to deal with attacks that drive down stock prices, crippling research and development budgets.

    Monday's ruling could strengthen smaller innovative companies that are not situated to challenge investment institutions at the federal level.

  • Pfizer is the partner of Merck KgaA. Bodes well.

  • beautifuldaytobike by beautifuldaytobike May 17, 2016 8:47 AM Flag

    He didn't get the job.

  • Case just got a huge boost on venue from the Supremes. Looks familiar.
    DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC. 10:32 AM ET 5/16/2016
    WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday issued a procedural ruling against a group of financial firms fighting a lawsuit alleging they manipulated the market for shares of Escala Group Inc., a company removed from the Nasdaq nearly a decade ago.

    The firms, including Bank of America Corp.'s Merrill Lynch and a UBS Group AG subsidiary, wanted the case heard in federal court, which is considered a friendlier venue for defendants in securities cases. Instead, the Supreme Court, in an opinion by Justice Elena Kagan, ruled unanimously that the case could proceed in New Jersey's state courts, the preferred venue for Escala founder Greg Manning and other shareholders who sued the firms.

    The Escala shareholders alleged the securities brokers, lured by commissions, allowed their customers to engage in short sales of more Escala stock than actually existed for a small, lightly-traded company. The effect was to drive down the prices of the company's shares, the plaintiffs allege.

  • Reply to

    Georgebushky talks to himself.

    by beautifuldaytobike May 16, 2016 10:59 AM
    beautifuldaytobike beautifuldaytobike May 16, 2016 11:28 AM Flag

    What makes you think it's one or the other? His being out of meds doesn't preclude in any way his sniffing that Columbian Marching powder again. I believe it makes it more likely. Just saying.

  • beautifuldaytobike by beautifuldaytobike May 16, 2016 10:59 AM Flag

    #$%$

  • beautifuldaytobike by beautifuldaytobike May 16, 2016 10:51 AM Flag

    Should start within days if not on a reversal today. It's queued for data releases. Nice reversal in XON. SYN had good update, ZIKA GMO mosquito approved in GC and Governor Scott of FL is very interested. ZIOP looks like a win on this time frame.

  • beautifuldaytobike by beautifuldaytobike May 16, 2016 8:18 AM Flag

    Wait until Miami and Disney see the drop off in tourism due to some wing-nuts in the Keys fighting the future. Or wait until some Senator's nephew gets microcephaly. Spraying is 30% effective and kills everything. There is no vaccine, and if there were, it'd be expensive. The Oxitec mosquito is ready now. It'll be interesting to watch developing countries saving their populations from this horror while the US sits on thumb.
    Kirk has placed himself on the side of inevitability. Bright guy.

  • beautifuldaytobike by beautifuldaytobike May 16, 2016 7:46 AM Flag

    He just purchased added shares on Friday. SYN just had a nice data release. ZIOP queued up for ASCO. Short blog was obviously BS but the short share price manipulation is a real danger here. Nothing to fear but lies, deceit, shorts, and old age. I added XON on this downturn. Biotech is volatile and you either trade the volatility or buy low. For me, there is no danger of this ship running aground. Lots of shorts circling. I remember when they did at CLDA with all the usual suspects noting how the new anti-depressant was going to be worthless, blah, blah, blah. Then CLDA popped from 12 to 34. Game over. On to the next.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

ZIOP
7.39+0.33(+4.67%)May 27 4:00 PMEDT