Glad to hear John's continued improvement, especially the reversibility stats supporting normal LFT. Belated birthday wishes to him. His birthday presence is a present for us all, even though I missed out on a piece of the cake. ;=3)
POTENTIAL X EVENTS;
could be several.
1) An expedited approval pathway in the works for MF trials soon to be announced. IMET fills this void and current need perfectly
2) A partnership announcement
3) A new multi-centred MF phase II trial continuation application submission
I bet you wish you could muster up a brain fart once I a while Maine. Look at the advantage you have wearing a colostomy bag.....you don't ever have to leave your computer desk for washroom breaks and your on line message posting pay becomes a continuous stream. Not to mention your daily production can easily be discarded in biohazard container at the end of each day.
INCY's pipeline consists of several indications for Jakafi, basically an anti inflammatory cancer treatment, none of which offer cancer remissions. Slight improvements in the condition with arm's length lists of serious side effects. The other 'breakfast serial' additives under the INC group have so far been dismal failures in their clinical trials which may explain the company's SP drop from $70 down to $50. Sound familiar? IMET on the other hand has given several people with 3rd & 4th stage MF clinical remissions and as far as we know still holding this bench mark. This is a huge accomplishment, regardless of how insignificant you make it seem.
From my brief experience with GERN my only observation from your comments Maine is to denigrate and belittle any poster ID that brings depth and insight to the board. Seems like your 'incyte' is more in promoting GERN's competitor than that of GERN's Holy Grail.
And I thought it was because I mentioned all the ill gotten earnings hedge fund owners made last year. George Soros $4Bil, David T e p per $3.5Bil And then David Cohen's insider trading fraud fine of $1.8Bil compared to his $2.3Bil earnings. Seems stiff until you realize the other $11Bil he's accumulated came from similar shady trading deals and or activity.
As Irish has implied the MAYO clinical hold on MF has been lifted allowing phase II to proceed.
As to the entire clinical hold being lifted on PV and ET trials your guess is as good as mine.
If all the above mentioned posters were the same multiple I-Der and removed from this board there would be no one left for you to mock, belittle or to discredit with your disparaging comments when the long or short of it is that you have no clue yourself as evidenced from your lack of any contribution of substance to this board.
We must share the same ID Maine as I too have used the term "brain fart" most likely in reference to one of your useless posts bfr.
totally agree with an armada of alligator operated ambulance chasers parked outside his office window he's taken the oath of silence right now. A lift on the current hold would flush them all out of the system once and fur all.
"Only 5%" ...that's the problem Blackmango why few on the GERN pond agree with your "downer" yet semi-compelling posts. U ALWAYS bring out the half empty glass thesis, all the time maintaining you are a belieber beaver erroring on the downside of current data . Even Alfalski's funeral parlor up in Pugwash Station presents a more uplifting atmosphere.
The few MAYO patients like John that were lucky enough to have received IMET and were basically "saved" by the drug were in a group that had exhausted all previous MF treatment and had no where else to turn. Many of these patients were so severely advanced that even administering IMET was too late for them. Had such treatment been available to them earlier, like John many more would have benefitted and still be alive today. Also as the genetic variation of targeted patients is studied I'm venturing to guess that the remission rate for a new "controlled" intake IMET patient trial cold produce results closer to the 100% mark. I'm erroring on the upside. Only 100% ???
...with any partial release it would certainly clear the parking lot outside of GERN's Menlo office of all the ambulance chasers parked there now.
Reg SHO Threshold List
REG SHO Overview
As defined in Rule 203(c)(6) of Regulation SHO, a “threshold security” is any equity security of any issuer that is registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, or that is required to file reports under Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act (commonly referred to as reporting securities), where, for five consecutive settlement days:
•There are aggregate fails to deliver at a registered clearing agency of 10,000 shares or more per security;
•The level of fails is equal to at least one-half of one percent of the issuer’s total shares outstanding; and
•The security is included on a list published by a self-regulatory organization (SRO).
A security ceases to be a threshold security if it does not exceed the specified level of fails for five consecutive settlement days.
GERN is not registered on the SHO list so I doubt there is much if any naked short positions.
Downside gaps; Mar-12-2014 4.35 to 1.82
Jan-27-2014 5.57 to 5.15
bring on the gap filler caulking gun
Jun-12-2014 upside gap 2.77 to 3.05. Why are the downside gaps always the ones to get filled?
It's human nature's underlying desire to believe in integrity, free play and a worthwhile value added causes hoping to gain something from honest investing. Unfortunately the system has gone to shmuck where investors have little to no control over their investments. It has encouraged a day trading culture as the only means to make and keep gains. As much as technology has leveled the playing field we see corruption and wanton greed rule the markets. Barclay's dark pool trading fraud was the latest in a long string of activities conducted against the investment community. If America is to regain it's position of global leadership it must first regain a reputation of integrity by cleaning house. The SEC needs teeth, not some worn out dentures Maine keeps in a jar beside his night stand.
Mgott, what's your definition of neutral territory?
Well clearly 'they' can. So when will you cover your position? Looks cheap enough right now.
Don't think for one minute that partisanship isn't part of the plan. Just another word for critter control. Did anything major change on Wall Street or State Street with either party at the helm?