Jones Soda Co. (JSDA) Message Board

belco_mc 58 posts  |  Last Activity: Apr 29, 2013 7:39 PM Member since: Aug 15, 2012
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Reply to

    NBC Sports Group

    by cbresident Apr 29, 2013 4:27 PM
    belco_mc belco_mc Apr 29, 2013 7:39 PM Flag

    It's a positive move as long as they didn't spend too much cash on it. Many people have left this company for dead and I think they will be proven wrong. They over built stores in NYC when they should have been doing smaller mall-based stores. They know this and have been making the adjustment. This company is early in its evolution and they will have to make many adjustments to get the formula correct. I think they will. And I think the stock is worth much more than where it is trading as long as the deal closes that raises the $10 million. If it does, we'll head back over $2. If not, we're in trouble. They need the capital.

  • Reply to

    will the deal close?

    by belco_mc Apr 23, 2013 1:30 PM
    belco_mc belco_mc Apr 24, 2013 10:26 AM Flag

    I think you should continue making investment decisions based on some wall street journal article. That author probably has made a lot of money as an investor. They must be right.

  • The stock was around $2.50 when the recent capital raise was being contemplated. In reading the agreement, if looks like a drop in the stock price does not constitute a material adverse change. If that's right, then the stock should go up from here if the deal gets done. If the new investor walks away... CRMB is in trouble. I think it's a good risk/reward from here- they got over saturated in NYC and that is hurting them. I'm buying here.

  • Reply to

    Butler buyout proposed.

    by longtimefollower Apr 18, 2013 7:03 PM
    belco_mc belco_mc Apr 19, 2013 9:39 AM Flag

    This whole thing needs to be investigated. Within a couple weeks, they can't get the earnings out, announce going dark and then now want to buy the cmopany after the stock gets killed? Something isn't right.

  • Reply to

    Dividend Cut

    by topline1 Apr 11, 2013 3:50 PM
    belco_mc belco_mc Apr 18, 2013 10:38 AM Flag

    Very bad Q1. It's time to let SB manage the portfolio and reduce the dividend. Business is bad and it's been a long time since they have come up with new, successful products.

  • Reply to

    Distribution

    by coveliegh Apr 17, 2013 4:32 PM
    belco_mc belco_mc Apr 18, 2013 7:58 AM Flag

    Is it your understanding that they have to distribute the cash since they are a REIT? Or could they do a tender (stock buyback), or use the funds to acquire another property?

  • Reply to

    Where's Steel?

    by silverfox120 Apr 9, 2013 10:09 AM
    belco_mc belco_mc Apr 16, 2013 1:53 PM Flag

    joev, your idea kind of makes sense as long as the underlying MLNK business shows some stabilization. You'd hate to put a good business like HNH into a company losing money.

  • Reply to

    $4.00 Price

    by silverfox120 Apr 11, 2013 12:46 PM
    belco_mc belco_mc Apr 16, 2013 1:52 PM Flag

    Bobo, Steel couldn't legally increase their holdings by buying in the open market. They were prohibited by the limitations MLNK put in place in order to preserve their NOL. MLNK also needed cash, which they would not have received had Steel bought shares in the open market rather than from the company. Steel paid a premium to the market price in order to gain control of the company, which they effectively got by having WL the Chairman and 2 Board seats. The stock didn't go up because, in spite of Steel buying in, it's still the same sh1tty business. The business needs to show a turnaround. So, contacting the SEC will only create a chuckle from them on what a knucklehead you are.

  • Reply to

    We will outlast whoever we need to outlast.

    by smaycs4 Apr 12, 2013 3:05 AM
    belco_mc belco_mc Apr 16, 2013 11:02 AM Flag

    If he continues making good capital allocation decisions (like buying 20% of CBRL) and SNS performs like he has promised, people will love him one day.

  • This company didn't innovate and stay with the current trends. Watch that video from last year's annual meeting. The speakers voice and the furniture design make the video seem like one they dusted off from the 1980's. Everything passed this company by- moving production to low cost countries, update the product line to stay current with changing trends, reducing costs, I could go on and on. They've always been a lower tier operator in their space and just couldn't keep up. They need some people on the management team with a more youthful and modern product style and management style.

  • Reply to

    going Dark....... is this a Chinese company?

    by auburndale303 Apr 9, 2013 1:07 PM
    belco_mc belco_mc Apr 9, 2013 2:02 PM Flag

    speaking of chinese, CRC is the last remaining furniture manufacturer in North American. And they can't turn a profit. What does that tell you? All the others were smart enough to figure out you can make furniture cheaper overseas. They are going to keep building their high cost furniture in N America until they run out of money. Which may not be long.

  • Another asset sale announced last night: $3 million
    Last month they sold an asset for $24.4 million

    That's $27.4 million in sales
    In addition, they had $2 million cash on the books, $2 million in marketable securities

    That gets you to $31.4 million.

    They also have a $3.6 million private equity portfolio.

    Now you're at $35/share. and most of that in cash.

    In addition, there are a few other smaller assets and another $2.5 million investment in affiliate.

    Subtract out some taxes on the Grove Isle sale and you are still well north of $30/share.

  • Reply to

    Insider Selling HMG Shares

    by aranow7 Apr 3, 2013 1:29 AM
    belco_mc belco_mc Apr 3, 2013 7:49 AM Flag

    He is 94 years old. I wouldn't read too much into that given his age.

  • Based on my math, HMG has over $25 per share in cash and investments. The vast majority of that is cash- and that is after estimating the tax liability from the recent sale. Add to that the net value of Monty's restaurant and Marina and you get well north of $30 per share.

    Anyone else have an opinion?

  • Reply to

    Why didn't Steel just buy on the open market

    by bodybag2006 Mar 13, 2013 12:41 PM
    belco_mc belco_mc Mar 13, 2013 4:28 PM Flag

    because he wanted control of the company, which he has now. He paid a premium to the current market in order to obtain Board seats and the Chairman role. He now controls the company, which he wouldn't have had if he bought in the open market. Also, as someone else pointed out, he was prohibited from buying more in the open market due to the shareholders rights plan to protect the NOL.

  • belco_mc by belco_mc Mar 13, 2013 7:01 AM Flag

    should be this week. Here is an excerpt from the press release:

    The Company expects to close such transaction on or soon after March 12, 2013, subject to obtaining stockholder approval of the transaction at the Company’s 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on March 12, 2013, and the satisfaction of other enumerated closing conditions.

  • Reply to

    514,500 share block just crossed

    by spook2b Mar 11, 2013 1:48 PM
    belco_mc belco_mc Mar 12, 2013 4:03 PM Flag

    I agree Steel will be buying in the open market. But only after the deal is done. The 1.4 mm share portion was part of a larger deal. Steel will use the 1.4 million purchase to both support the stock and lower his cost basis. It should provide a floor.

  • Has anyone had any contact with management? Any insight into what they will do with the proceeds? The obvious uses are: buy another property, pay a large dividend, or tender for shares. Any thoughts?

  • Reply to

    764K block @ $3.02

    by spook2b Mar 5, 2013 12:32 PM
    belco_mc belco_mc Mar 5, 2013 2:57 PM Flag

    I believe that if you read the agreement pertaining to paragraph 4, you will find the 1.4 million share purchase authorization contained in that agreement. Do an SEC search for HNH, I think I ran across it there in a recent filing. The Board doesn't need shareholder approval to allow Steel to buy the 1.4 million shares. That is already covered in the agreement done last year to protect the NOL's. But the 1.4 million share purchase was part of the overall agreement in paragraph 4.

  • Only the spammers are here... guess that means investors still haven't figured out how much value is here yet.

JSDA
0.62Jun 19 3:59 PMEDT