The deal is basically done but there are still regulatory approvals and it may be a couple of months yet until WhatsApp is on the books. This earnings will not show dilution nor revenue from WhatsApp.
You are correct that stock prices do fluctuate and if you have been holding a year you have done well. The analysts targets are the end of next year (2015) and the target is 73.66. GL
Its called the law of big numbers. As the capitalization becomes large and the amount of money required to move it increases, then the stock moves less and less by a percentage basis.
I don't know what you are trying to say. Are you trying to say it will go to $150? Anyway, If you are going to call other people stupid or a moron, then you have to support what you say and on the same token you need to write coherent messages which you don't.
I am not saying this wont go up. I am saying how in the world can people pepper this board with statements it is going to $200 without anything to support what they say.
Back at you idoit. Alan don't start with me. 100 is not 200. No one knows where it will go.
Tsk Tsk Tsk. Getting a little angry. Ive been on these boards since 2006. How long have you been on it. Hmmmmm?
Your name calling is desperate and shows your sickness. Learn a little sarcasm. I know you don't know what the word. If you don't know what it is doesn't mean other people are illiterate. You can call me a dingleberry but at least I don't eat them like you. I am tired of playing your childish games. Grow up bud. Try to be mature and not a hypocrite. .
BTW What does adi stand for. I can answer that. Adi me to the ignore list. You go on iggy with all the rest of the dolts and nutcases.
Ahhhhhhh Adi. The sociopath tangential arguer. You threw very immature comments cross thread. If you want to talk about being an adult, you better look back at some of your other threads. Adult like..... nah. So don't use that argument. If you want to go around saying (or supporting) it will go to 100 next week, be my guest but I will call you on it. Capeesh.
Most of the big money flow came in earlier this quarter. You can see most set ups through the charts and volume.
Not short and not a fool like you. It will go where it goes adi but you know what they say......I cant argue with a #$%$
If mark my words or mark my post is used it must be true unless it doesn't happen then it is just a mark my word post.
Growth is a pat answer and 200 is just a number. It will travel on its own conviction it wont follow the trajectory of AAPL or GOOG. FB has already gone up 300% from its lows.
I am glad you bought other stocks but that says nothing for FB. How about buying MSFT for a split adjusted .25. How about RIMM when it was really low. How about DNDN when it was $4 and shot up to close to $40 overnight.
There are a lot of stocks you can make money on................Enough said
I am not short and I have made money trading. Those who bought low did well. If you are going to hold that is great. What will it take to get this to $200? That is a huge number. You cant just throw it out there.
Its not the traders nor the shorts that are bad. There are very reasonable people who offer a lot to this board and have a lot of experience but many more people who offer nothing. Yes there are people who spam this board like any other stock board. No one is trying to direct or have people buy or sell this stock by their posts. This board has probably some of the most inexperienced traders and investors around.
We can all scream our price points and try to be heard or we can talk about what drives the stock. If you are asking for a rah rah board, what good is that?
If you are calling $200 easy, there has to be a reason like market history or the fundamentals of the stock. Collectively the analysts have a little bit above a $70 target for the end of 2015. What takes the stock there and what is involved in getting it there............. or is $200 just a number? I would like to see a rationale really well thought discussion so everyone can utilize this board for something real. I know that is not going to happen so what we will see is "FB is going to $10 or it is going to $500". Everybody can yell while they have their heads in the sand.
Its just a stock not game between traders shorts and longs to see who yells loudest.
I am not playing with logic so much as others are playing illogical statements. FB is going up and it is rising with a decent conviction. I don't know where it is going to go before earnings but so far it has risen about 12 and some change since pre-earnings highs.
People who are predicting these short term pie in the sky predictions are momo and option players trying to justify their deep otm options. I don't think anything is easy and I don't think many people grasp what is going on. Most of it is wishes. It could go to 80 or 90 and even a 100 in the near term but there is no guarantees and the probability is small that will happen.
I am not applying logic. I know it is rising but you have question all these pie in the sky predictions that have no precedence based on the current market action. These people also have no rationale. I know it is nice to think oooo-boy stock will go to $200 by the end of next year but you have to understand these are peoples wishes not the market action. GL
Ah okaty, you are talking about solar films. Skins usually define the outside of the fuselage and wings. What ever they do they will need to have very efficient solar cells. The biggest obstacle will be the weight of wiring and the efficiency of the cells. Ones that are okay for ground based solar or for charging phones will not be applicable to the drones. Another thing to study is the bonding of two dis-similar materials such as the skins and structural portions of the planes. I am not familiar with the company you described. There are many solar companies so we can see what they come up with. GL
It is a long term speculative buy. It is small money for FB so it doesn't really matter. Cant compare drones to satellites. The drones are going to point to point like a cell tower. The height will allow it more coverage area but the transmissions will be in radio frequencies instead of much higher frequencies which are used in satellites. It could be many years before there is a prototype so the Titan purchase will be non-factor for awhile. Little money means no sweat.