Tue, Sep 16, 2014, 8:45 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Catalyst Pharmaceutical Partners Inc. Message Board

berryballs2003 57 posts  |  Last Activity: Sep 3, 2014 9:39 PM Member since: Jul 17, 2013
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Reply to

    Lincoln Capital

    by adrianthefrog Sep 3, 2014 2:45 PM
    berryballs2003 berryballs2003 Sep 3, 2014 9:39 PM Flag

    It's okay Robin. Batman admitted he was wrong. It's hard to connect the dots when so many are left out.

  • Reply to

    Lincoln Capital

    by adrianthefrog Sep 3, 2014 2:45 PM
    berryballs2003 berryballs2003 Sep 3, 2014 9:38 PM Flag

    You're amazing. You are the king of pointing out others' mistakes, but I point out yours (which you admit was a mistake) and you respond by calling me stupid and cracking a joke about brain cells to draw attention away from your mistake. I call you arrogant because you are arrogant and your previous post just underscores my point. Your narcissism rivals that of another poster who used to be a doctor. You've pretty much managed to take control of this board over the last few months. Congratulations. You should be proud.

  • Reply to

    Lincoln Capital

    by adrianthefrog Sep 3, 2014 2:45 PM
    berryballs2003 berryballs2003 Sep 3, 2014 7:00 PM Flag

    I do make mistakes, but I don't present myself as an arrogant know-it-all like you do on a regular basis. So when you do make a mistake, you should expect to be confronted with it.

    At least you admitted you were wrong, although you could only bring yourself to say you were "a bit wrong."

  • Reply to

    Lincoln Capital

    by adrianthefrog Sep 3, 2014 2:45 PM
    berryballs2003 berryballs2003 Sep 3, 2014 5:07 PM Flag

    Since when is 2 million half of 20 million? They've said numerous times that they have 18 million remaining available, including yesterday.

  • Reply to

    This statement worries me

    by jegfsu Aug 27, 2014 11:08 AM
    berryballs2003 berryballs2003 Aug 27, 2014 11:14 AM Flag

    The CLIA partnership is all that matters in this case. If they name the partner, the "launch" date will depend on how quickly the partner can get it up and running. I don't think AMBS can definitively identify the launch date because it won't be entirely up to them once the partnership comes to fruition. That's how I would interpret that, but I'm open to hearing different views on it.

  • Reply to

    "Numerous updates early next week"

    by ounlopez Aug 19, 2014 6:43 PM
    berryballs2003 berryballs2003 Aug 20, 2014 5:01 PM Flag

    For someone who typically cuts down speculation, I find it interesting that you are now speculating what is going through the minds of the AMBS board members. I guess if it suits your own argument, then it's fine with you, huh?

  • Reply to

    "Numerous updates early next week"

    by ounlopez Aug 19, 2014 6:43 PM
    berryballs2003 berryballs2003 Aug 20, 2014 4:19 PM Flag

    Major or minor, he said we'd get updates and we got updates. You can't deny that.

  • Reply to

    "Numerous updates early next week"

    by ounlopez Aug 19, 2014 6:43 PM
    berryballs2003 berryballs2003 Aug 20, 2014 4:02 PM Flag

    There is a simple answer to this question.

    There have been four updates since that tweet came out last Thursday. That's right. FOUR.

    1) Bascom-Palmer RP press release last Friday (important development)
    2) 10-Q last Friday (lots of information in there)
    3) Announcement of conferences they will be attending (not that big of a deal)
    4) Definitive Proxy Statement (lots of information in there)

    That's FOUR updates since the tweet, three of which were major. We've gone weeks at a time without any updates in the past and now we get four in four trading days and it's not enough. Just because the updates weren't what you were hoping for doesn't mean that GC lied or misled anybody. You made the decision in your brain to raise your expectation level. GC said we'd get updates. He didn't say they would be partnerships or grants or data or anything specific. Guess what? We got updates. He misled nobody. You misled yourself.

  • Reply to

    Closing Price

    by robertluciano1009 Aug 18, 2014 4:13 PM
    berryballs2003 berryballs2003 Aug 18, 2014 4:52 PM Flag

    Fair enough. Thanks for the response.

  • Reply to

    Closing Price

    by robertluciano1009 Aug 18, 2014 4:13 PM
    berryballs2003 berryballs2003 Aug 18, 2014 4:26 PM Flag

    Why do you keep deleting your profile and re-creating it? This is the third time in the last week. I've had a few of my posts disappear because you had started the original thread and then deleted your profile. I'm really not trying to be a jag, but I'm just curious because it's peculiar. Anybody who follows this board has seen your name and knows you were around before August 18, 2014 and have posted more than once. What gives?

  • berryballs2003 berryballs2003 Aug 16, 2014 10:24 AM Flag

    Why did you re-create your alias on Friday? You had some pretty negative posts all week until Friday and all of a sudden, you delete your old profile (which also deletes old posts) and start posting positively.

  • Reply to

    National Exchange

    by robertluciano1009 Aug 13, 2014 7:36 AM
    berryballs2003 berryballs2003 Aug 13, 2014 10:57 PM Flag

    My mistake. I typed pps but meant 13000% increase in market cap so explain how that's a bad thing.

  • Reply to

    National Exchange

    by robertluciano1009 Aug 13, 2014 7:36 AM
    berryballs2003 berryballs2003 Aug 13, 2014 8:42 PM Flag

    Wow. Thanks for pointing that out. That means from 8/13/12 until 7/30/14 (less than 2 years), GC led an increase of about 13000% in the pps. That's even more impressive than my first example!

  • Reply to

    National Exchange

    by robertluciano1009 Aug 13, 2014 7:36 AM
    berryballs2003 berryballs2003 Aug 13, 2014 2:52 PM Flag

    I'll re-post this in this thread since apparently you deleted the thread in which it originally appeared...

    AMBS market cap history:

    8/13/12 = $1.070 million
    8/13/13 = $17.52 million
    8/13/14 = $77.8 million

    Seems like pretty substantial growth over a two-year period to me.

    He must be a terrible CEO (sarcasm).

  • berryballs2003 berryballs2003 Aug 13, 2014 12:58 PM Flag

    I didn't see the obituary for Lympro. I think you are jumping the gun a bit on that one.

    People need to stop assuming the AMBS share price is going to be a dime when they are ready to pull the trigger on a RS. There is a lot of news pending.

    I was in ZLCS when that happened. Their problem was that they were all or nothing on one drug and it failed. Now ZLCS doesn't even exist anymore. It's a completely different scenario and not applicable here.

  • berryballs2003 berryballs2003 Aug 13, 2014 12:51 PM Flag

    You're neglecting to think about the flip side. If the share price climbs from where it is now, the RS figure decreases proportionally. The whole plan is to catapult off of the upcoming catalysts to minimize the ratio of the RS. That's been the plan all along. Why are so many people acting like this is something new? GC never said that there would be no RS. He said there was a possibility that there would be no RS. We don't know exactly what's coming so perhaps that possibility still exists.

    From the latest blog: "Many of you are likely asking how the Company can possibly expect to up-list to a national exchange in 2014 without the need for a reverse split of its common shares. The answer is that the Company does not know where its common shares will be priced towards the end of this year, and therefore cannot project what will be required in terms of a reverse split or if a reverse split will be needed. However, we remain optimistic that we can significantly increase shareholder value through value building events both from a scientific and clinical perspective, as well as a capital markets perspective."

    I don't think he's wavered from that message at all since I've been a shareholder (January 2014).

  • Reply to

    Carl Icahn Quote...

    by robertluciano1009 Aug 13, 2014 9:24 AM
    berryballs2003 berryballs2003 Aug 13, 2014 9:57 AM Flag

    AMBS market cap history:

    8/13/12 = $1.070 million
    8/13/13 = $17.52 million
    8/13/14 = $77.8 million

    Seems like pretty substantial growth over a two-year period to me. He must be a terrible CEO (sarcasm).

  • Reply to

    Look, you guys don't have to agree with me

    by mkerryfuller Aug 12, 2014 4:04 PM
    berryballs2003 berryballs2003 Aug 12, 2014 7:17 PM Flag

    Whatever you say. It's sad that you are too egotistical and arrogant to admit you may have overstated it the slightest bit. You can't even give an inch when someone stands up and disagrees with you. Again, you deflect and turn the tables to give the appearance that I have made the mistake. Perhaps, I have, but the fact is, you can't prove GC feels compelled to do anything based on the evidence you've presented. But if that explanation helps stroke your ego, good for you.

    This time I'm done and I mean it. This will allow you to get the last word, which I know is important to you.

  • Reply to

    Look, you guys don't have to agree with me

    by mkerryfuller Aug 12, 2014 4:04 PM
    berryballs2003 berryballs2003 Aug 12, 2014 5:54 PM Flag

    8 tweets by GC in just over month but you still won't admit the "addict" label was out of line. I was wrong about you having a position here. Big deal. Just admit that GC is not a social media addict as you claimed. I've provided evidence he is not. Will your ego allow you to admit your were wrong? You're really good at deflecting people with sarcasm and humor, but I'm not letting you off the hook on this one.

    By the way, it's called "tweeting" and not "twittering." If it's part of your job, you might want to know the difference.

  • Reply to

    Look, you guys don't have to agree with me

    by mkerryfuller Aug 12, 2014 4:04 PM
    berryballs2003 berryballs2003 Aug 12, 2014 5:25 PM Flag

    Be careful, you're starting to sound like everyone's favorite mentally ill doctor. Holy cow, you must carry a mirror around with you everywhere you go so you can bask in your own glory.

    What exactly am I "laying on you?" You called a guy who tweets every now and then (not even everyday) a social media addict. That's absurd. If you can't admit that you exaggerated that, then you are just unwilling to listen. He's tweeted EIGHT times since the Q & A session on July 10th (not counting things he's re-tweeted from others). That's 8 original tweets in over a month. What an addict!

    No matter how the information is disseminated, there will always be plenty of confusion on these boards. I thought you'd know by now that the one of the main uses of these message boards is to CREATE confusion. Perhaps you're using it to your advantage in this case since you are apparently the greatest trader in the history of the world.

    I'm done going back and forth because you are exhausting. By the way, I thought you sold your position. You are posting on a message board for a stock you don't own far more frequently than the man you call an addict is tweeting. Put your ego aside and think about that for a minute. Not sure you're capable.

CPRX
3.150.00(0.00%)Sep 16 4:00 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.