yes this is about nothing . if anything the defese attorneys just leaked what he actually did
thanks for agreeing with me...false information as in someone made it up on a blog is not a breach but defense attorneys clearly stating that parrot used governmental privilege when he declined to answer questions is a breech....
so by complaining about a possible breach of the protective order the defense has confirmed that parrott declined to answer questions claiming GOVERNMENTAL PRIVILEGE GROUNDS, well glad that is settled...the defense attorneys should be held in contempt
this is to stupid. The defense says there was a breach in the order only the breach was not accurate information....duh therefore there was no breach since the information was not accurate. So something that was not accurate was written in a blog and it needs to be addressed ...more hokus pokus bs
so the reason for the third was to save the company. by taking all of its money.....this is so patently false the attorneys should be disbarred
paulsons motivation is simply the administration needed money to slow down the rise in the national debt.
at some point the government will run out of delaying tactics and some rulings will start to knock down the house of cards. IMO the federal cases will not go away as there are many other issues to be dealt with like the amounts already paid back are more than the loan. and the super preferred shares which were used as collateral should be withdrawn and disposed of. If this was a private company that attempted to do this the ceo would be in prison.
actually a positive for trump since the iowans have not picked correctly in the last 4 presidential elections. not 1 in the last 4 has gone on to get the nomination. rubio wants open borders
sorry but they still show the LOAN on the books as not paid back and if not for the sweep fnma would still be paying a 10 percent dividend. please show me how you purchase stock and get paid back by the company?. the super preferred were used as collateral in other loans and cancelled of when the other loans were paid back
the only thing you can plead the fifth for is so as to not incriminate yourself for a previous crime,,,,not to prevent you from committing perjury in the present
there is also the possibility that documents proving his statements false exist and he does not want to go on record making things up....or other witness testimony that shows he lied
play on words since the taxpayers never saw a dime. fnf paid the loan plus. the government is collecting on both sides either they get the loan paid or the lawsuits. not both
about an adviser to the president pleads the fifth. protecting himself from criminal prosecution and it is nowhere to be found on the news,,,,especially the yahoo page
and the government sued the banks that committed all of the fraud and raked in billions that went to the treasury instead of back to fnf
one judge in one case does not set precedent for other judges at the same or higher levels. That is how cases work their way up to the supreme court.