Cookie, The CAFC will have a ruling by the end of the year and it won't be pretty for you. But then I'm sure you have $500 million golden parachute and a tropical island for your man friends all set up. Anyways have a good night and off to iggyland.
Cookie is that you? Tim shouldn't you be working on how to keep AAPL from losing more market share? Really is that the best you can come up with. The CAFC will have a ruling by the end of the year and it won't be pretty for you. But then I'm sure you have $500 million golden parachute and a tropical island for your man friends all set up. Anyways have a good night and off to iggyland.
"the term was typically applied to businessmen who used what were considered to be exploitative practices to amass their wealth. These practices included exerting control over national resources, accruing high levels of government influence, paying extremely low wages, squashing competition by acquiring competitors in order to create monopolies and eventually raise prices, and schemes to sell stock at inflated prices"
There's a potential for a short squeeze with VRNG with their news on Fri. There are some strong similarities with VHC. Defendant is huge, GOOG. IP patents are involved. High short numbers. The question is will they be able to keep a lid on the price. If they can't then that has got to make our nervous.
terp, you could be right. But the facts remain. AAPL lost and the chances of the CAFC overturning the case are next to nil.
Do you think after Jan OEX we'll have less volatility and perhaps a better chance for a move up with MM having less interest in keeping contracts OTM? It would seem logical if that is part of the manipulation. TIA.
A class action lawsuit against those crooks would be nice way to start the new year.