Fri, Aug 22, 2014, 9:54 AM EDT - U.S. Markets close in 6 hrs 6 mins

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Silver Wheaton Corp. Message Board

billyteex1 847 posts  |  Last Activity: 1 hour 20 minutes ago Member since: Jul 17, 2006
  • Reply to

    Good to have you back Vonny

    by new_to_the_game_00 19 hours ago
    billyteex1 billyteex1 1 hour 20 minutes ago Flag

    Clearly BTD was a backdoor move to hype and dilute. You don't ignore the instructions, unless the hype is the only thing important here.

    How many shares did they dilute during that circus? No company has preyed on the unsophisticated, like this one has.

  • Reply to

    From one of the fed filings:

    by cl124cl 10 hours ago
    billyteex1 billyteex1 2 hours 14 minutes ago Flag

    Great DD. Knowing that only 15M shares maybe floating around, kind of gives us the edge on decisions when we hold or sell. Frost buying 100K shares is even a bigger deal, when you think about it. I have never seen a public traded company where insiders control 95%.

    My one hope also is that they are using the science on drugs that have a quicker pathway for approvals. Re-looking at a drug that went generic and finding a way to improve on it. You could assign a small team to look around and find things that worked, but just needed a deep look. There might be hundreds of things that their science can re-arm the industry with.

  • Reply to

    Civil.D

    by oosetrain760 Aug 16, 2014 10:56 AM
    billyteex1 billyteex1 17 hours ago Flag

    Maybe the army committed for two years and so you are seeing the second half order for 2015 and the first half order in 2014 already in the works?

  • Reply to

    CC

    by billyteex1 Aug 19, 2014 3:55 PM
    billyteex1 billyteex1 17 hours ago Flag

    I don't even read stupid's comments anymore.

  • billyteex1 billyteex1 Aug 21, 2014 8:21 AM Flag

    Is your IQ this low? I stated that the 4 was a signal to MM's that someone wanted 4M shares, someone on the selling side has to be willing to let go of their 4M shares. It takes two tango.

  • billyteex1 billyteex1 Aug 20, 2014 6:01 PM Flag

    The 50 day moving average rested just above the 200 day. Never crossed it. This is actually a very good sign. Anytime this has happen in the past the stock went higher.

  • billyteex1 billyteex1 Aug 20, 2014 11:06 AM Flag

    Needs to break above both the 50 and 200 DMA. Every time it does the stock see green. Around $2.50 area the 50 and 200 day merge.

  • Reply to

    Preclinical testing has started

    by cl124cl Aug 20, 2014 9:30 AM
    billyteex1 billyteex1 Aug 20, 2014 10:39 AM Flag

    I pointed this out a few weeks back. The important stuff isn't the preclinical stuff, it's the key word "Two sets" of HCV candidates.

  • billyteex1 billyteex1 Aug 20, 2014 8:13 AM Flag

    Always nice when they deliver something you didn't expect.

  • Reply to

    New theory

    by billyteex1 Aug 18, 2014 11:56 AM
    billyteex1 billyteex1 Aug 20, 2014 7:37 AM Flag

    The 4 share sold yesterday, two days ago it was 1 share. However followed by these low numbers is a bigger share day volume. Let's see if that holds true today. My guess someone wants 4M shares.

  • Reply to

    Got You All Hoodwinked

    by scambuster70 Aug 19, 2014 4:28 PM
    billyteex1 billyteex1 Aug 20, 2014 7:18 AM Flag

    Looks like scambuster forgot to change the ID before he posted this.

  • Reply to

    Lawsuits

    by billyteex1 Aug 20, 2014 6:56 AM
    billyteex1 billyteex1 Aug 20, 2014 7:15 AM Flag

    Throw in the other one where they had to pay back the company each $2M dollars and yes please finance their next claims. The last two didn't work out for these investors, but we all know the third time is the charm.

    I still believe the company needs to sign a MOU with investors, that they will not dilute in to the China MOU. I think it's time that something is real. Call me old fashion, but when companies promote back door BTD and investors like Vorlon, will make up things like AA will come from this type C meeting, well someone better now be alerting investors, TO BE CAREFUL. You see JZ will not be looking out for anyone's best interests but his own. Hopefully the China pharma looks carefully into the games this company pulls.

    Should we send them a copy of the litigation sections of the 10-Q, they maybe as dense as JZ. Again you cannot make this stuff up.

    .

  • Reply to

    Lawsuits

    by billyteex1 Aug 20, 2014 6:56 AM
    billyteex1 billyteex1 Aug 20, 2014 7:00 AM Flag

    Look more.

    On July 9, 2014, the Plaintiffs and the Defendants filed joint motions in the Farrah Case, the Chaney Case and the Dauphinee Case to consolidate the cases and transfer them to United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. By order dated July 16, 2014, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee entered an order consolidating the Farrah Case, the Chaney Case and the Dauphinee Case (collectively and, as consolidated, the “Securities Litigation”) and transferred the Securities Litigation to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee.

    Hurtado Shareholder Derivative Lawsuit

    On June 4, 2014, Karla Hurtado (the “Plaintiff”) derivatively on behalf of the Company, filed a shareholder derivative complaint in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee (the “Court”), against H. Craig Dees, Timothy C. Scott, Jan E. Koe, Kelly M. McMasters, and Alfred E. Smith, IV (collectively, the “Individual Defendants”), and against the Company as a nominal defendant (the “Hurtado Shareholder Derivative Lawsuit”). The Hurtado Shareholder Derivative Lawsuit alleges (i) breach of fiduciary duties and (ii) abuse of control, both claims based on the Plaintiff’s allegations that the Individual Defendants recklessly permitted the Company to disclose false and misleading information and failed to implement adequate controls and procedures to ensure the accuracy of the Company’s disclosures.

    On July 25, 2014, the court presiding over the Hurtado Shareholder Derivative Lawsuit entered an order transferring the case to the United District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. It is anticipated that an order will be entered by agreement that will stay all activity in the Hurtado Shareholder Derivative Lawsuit pending the resolution of an anticipated motion to dismiss the anticipated consolidated amended complaint in the Securities Litigation.

    As a nominal defendant, no rel

  • billyteex1 by billyteex1 Aug 20, 2014 6:56 AM Flag

    Since JZ is to ignorant to read the 10-Q, but will comment on things he knows nothing about here are the lawsuits and lead plaintiffs:

    Class Action Lawsuits

    On May 27, 2014, Cary Farrah and James H. Harrison, Jr., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated (the “Farrah Case”), and on May 29, 2014, each of Paul Jason Chaney, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated (the “Chaney Case”), and Jayson Dauphinee, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated (the “Dauphinee Case”) (the plaintiffs in the Farrah Case, the Chaney Case and the Dauphinee Case collectively referred to as the “Plaintiffs”), each filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee against the Company, H. Craig Dees, Timothy C. Scott and Peter R. Culpepper (the “Defendants”) alleging violations by the Defendants of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. Specifically, the Plaintiffs in each of the Farrah Case, the Chaney Case and the Dauphinee Case allege that the Defendants are liable for making false statements and failing to disclose adverse facts known to them about the Company, in connection with the Company’s application to the FDA for Breakthrough Therapy Designation (“BTD”) in the Spring of 2014 and the FDA’s subsequent denial of the Company’s application for BTD. The Company intends to defend vigorously against all claims in these complaints. However, in view of the inherent uncertainties of litigation and the early stage of this litigation, the outcome of these cases cannot be predicted at this time. Likewise, the amount of any potential loss cannot be reasonably estimated.

    On July 9, 2014, the Plaintiffs and the Defendants filed joint motions in the Farrah Case, the Chaney Case and the Dauphinee Case to consolidate the cases and transfer them to United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. By order dated July 16, 2014, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee entered an order consolidating the Farrah Case, the Chaney Case and the Dauphinee Case (collectively and, as consolidated, the “Securities Litigation”) and transferred the Securities Litigation to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee.

  • Reply to

    King of the Acronym

    by billyteex1 Aug 19, 2014 12:07 PM
    billyteex1 billyteex1 Aug 20, 2014 6:50 AM Flag

    Read the 10-Q, the names of the lead plaintiff are there. As for a test, are you talking about the one you couldn't pass and have had every opportunity to set your own one up. You always will be known as the guy who asked for the test, then cried all weekend about the test and then failed the test. You cannot make this stuff up. I was 100% correct that you and many others were using multiple ID's to pump this.

  • Reply to

    King of the Acronym

    by billyteex1 Aug 19, 2014 12:07 PM
    billyteex1 billyteex1 Aug 19, 2014 6:59 PM Flag

    I think you wet your pants over the weekend you were to take a test. I could careless if you are mean to me. This isn't about us, it's about if this company is capable of anything real. SO FAR THAT"s A BIG NO.

    I don't see a company that has done anything to enhance shareholder value, I see a company that has no issue lining their own pockets. If that makes me a AH, good, we need about twenty more AH's here, making sure you see appreciation on a real deal. If you think I'm wrong explain the numerous lawsuits.

    You just want your money back and some more lies, maybe the only way you see that happening. Best part getting hard for this company to pull the wool over investors eyes. The problem with dealing with unsophisticated investors, YOU RUN OUT OF THEM and the only thing you have left are the desperate ones. Like YOU.

  • Reply to

    CC

    by billyteex1 Aug 19, 2014 3:55 PM
    billyteex1 billyteex1 Aug 19, 2014 6:45 PM Flag

    Harl was right on point. Key points, Cash will improve by $50M in the second half of the year. Oil and Gas could return to 8-9% margins. Friday they will present new phase of the Google data tool in NY. Good visability into 2015 and 2016.

    Cross country Canada pipeline still in the works. SAG D in Canada offers great opportunities. They were predicting a $40M improvement in EBDITA for 2014, already at $30M. My feeling they easily get $60M improvement.

  • Reply to

    How Much Lard Does NTTG Consume Daily?

    by scambuster70 Aug 19, 2014 2:54 PM
    billyteex1 billyteex1 Aug 19, 2014 4:46 PM Flag

    It's a mortal sin to question anything here. I found that out early and even got caught up with the hype. I won't make that mistake again. I'll work hard to dethrone you.

  • Reply to

    How Much Lard Does NTTG Consume Daily?

    by scambuster70 Aug 19, 2014 2:54 PM
    billyteex1 billyteex1 Aug 19, 2014 4:24 PM Flag

    NTTG do they hate you more than me? Looks like JZ has another new ID. They don't like it when their PUMP fails. Ironic if this goes back to .82 fast. One day JZ is within $1.55 of breakeven, then the reality sets in that MOU is code for bid us up, so we can supply another 30M shares. I was reading the 10-Q interesting stuff about all the lawsuits. Do you ever notice how the pumpers never analyze the bad stuff. Most boards the longs are the ones who question these things. Here they want no discussion whatsoever. That is a big red flag, that means the bagholder's only looking out for themselves and intentionally fail to discuss the ramification's. Honest longs want all the fact's not just the ones that lead investors on.

    Very corrupt board. As I warned you, that the vorlon and darrells would be the first to leave the scene. Technically they are still here, they just use a new aliases. Right JZ?

  • Reply to

    .42

    by billyteex1 Aug 19, 2014 4:08 PM
    billyteex1 billyteex1 Aug 19, 2014 4:12 PM Flag

    Actually .43...even better.

SLW
24.7499-0.0901(-0.36%)9:54 AMEDT

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.