Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Silver Wheaton Corp. Message Board

billyteex1 33 posts  |  Last Activity: Apr 26, 2016 6:34 AM Member since: Jul 17, 2006
  • billyteex1 billyteex1 Apr 26, 2016 6:34 AM Flag

    I'm sure they saw your photo of the sex change and they are thumbing downing how you look as a women. Don't be such a drama queen. BTW watch the IQD, it may change your tune here. Now shave your legs and act like a lady.

    Knowing you need $153 a share on VAPR to breakeven, you should worry about yourself.

  • billyteex1 billyteex1 Apr 15, 2016 3:41 PM Flag

    I'm not talking about PVCT and Pv-10. So you do not have to persuade me. I'm more interested in what VBIV will do with their vaccine + check point inhibitors. I think most have given up on PVCT ever delivery on anything. First the CEo would not steal if they were close to something.

    The longs here are getting a good lesson in what to watch out for.

  • billyteex1 billyteex1 Apr 15, 2016 12:17 PM Flag

    Good point, but would you want the side effects of chemo or a check point inhibitor? Here is a recent article about what you are referencing.

    Checkpoint inhibitors can produce immune-related side effects in any organ or system of the body: the skin, gastrointestinal tract, endocrine glands, liver, nervous system, and pulmonary system. They can cause inflammatory conditions such as colitis, hypophysitis, nephritis, and uveitis—anything that ends in -itis. The most common side effects, however, are fatigue, rash, mild nausea, and decreased appetite, all of which are relatively easy for the patient to tolerate and the physician to treat. We also commonly see elevated or decreased thyroid hormone levels, which we are able to treat.

    Approximately 70% of patients receiving a checkpoint inhibitor experience some type of side effect. Only 10% of patients experience a grade 3 or 4 side effect, however. Those percentages are pretty consistent across all of the checkpoint inhibitors. It is important to remember that clinical trials have shown that checkpoint inhibitors produce less toxicity than does single-agent chemotherapy. Side effects that cause death or require discontinuation of the checkpoint inhibitor are rare.

  • billyteex1 billyteex1 Apr 15, 2016 11:00 AM Flag

    Is this vorlon or a mock id?

    Having a drug that wakes up the immune system is a good idea, having one that recruits the immune cells to the tumor is better, having a drug that can do it all by triggering the whole cascade of multiple paths is best.

    I like VBIV in this field. Read their latest press releases on what they are discovering. Looks like my prediction of .25 here is on course. Sorry that is happening to honest investors, but the clowns like JZ and edgars, you needed a wake up call. Maybe next time you see the red flags and understand that raising capital is what biotechs are about. Some do it with deception.

    VBIV be aware they are merging with SVACF, they will do a RS after this. So take a look and keep it on your radar.

  • billyteex1 billyteex1 Apr 8, 2016 8:26 AM Flag

    NTTG,

    Would you as CEO steal from your company if you were actually close to something real? When the dust clears here, the longs will sit back and most of this will finally be clear to them. BTD was smoke and mirrors, ph3 trial dragging out 4 years. PD10 sitting on the shelf for 6 years.

    White collar crime is on the surge. Thanks to a few here, they get away with it longer then they should.

  • Reply to

    Where was I after the Adam Fuerstein article?

    by vorlon.1966 Apr 6, 2016 11:06 AM
    billyteex1 billyteex1 Apr 7, 2016 10:51 AM Flag

    Some of this is funny, some of it ridiculous. I understand that the pumpers did anything they could to defame and this is payback. I never understood the mocking id's. What happen to just being true to yourself and letting your views play out. I get more satisfaction that I warned here, that I pointed out who the multiple id's were and in the end, i didn't lose money and maybe convinced honest investors to watch out for this one.

    Everyone needs to grow up. Inventing 10 id's is for children and this board had a lot of children running around on it.

  • Reply to

    TRUMP 2016!, TRUMP 2020!, AND TRUMP 2024!

    by derrall_v Mar 14, 2016 1:07 AM
    billyteex1 billyteex1 Apr 7, 2016 10:28 AM Flag

    Don't leave out Edgars id. He ran off after posting this would go to $6 and then to .50. He erased it, but Hillary learned that nothing stays erased.

    The pumpers were all here to help move the dilution. BTW, remember I called that this would hit .25. JZ and others here owe concerned investors an apology. You followed us around on other boards and called us names, well now you are finding out, that we actual knew what we were pointing out.

  • Reply to

    I'VE NEVER SEEN..............

    by pvct_fraud Apr 6, 2016 10:12 AM
    billyteex1 billyteex1 Apr 6, 2016 2:34 PM Flag

    I am not surprised by the recent news. Just imagine what they would have stolen, if AF had not taken the air out of this. The story sounded believable and that is how they work it. Hopefully this is a lesson well learned.

    This is a good lesson investing in bio's and what to watch out for. You never know if your instincts are right, until these moments show it clearly. Hopefully the little boys here...grow up finally.

  • Reply to

    So can someone explain

    by anthony7952468 Mar 29, 2016 9:18 AM
    billyteex1 billyteex1 Mar 31, 2016 6:36 AM Flag

    Really not long enough!

  • Reply to

    So can someone explain

    by anthony7952468 Mar 29, 2016 9:18 AM
    billyteex1 billyteex1 Mar 29, 2016 10:55 AM Flag

    VBI shareholders will get 20.80836 shares for each one they own. So when the dust settles there will be 1.4B shares in Svacf. The story I'm hearing is they will then do a RS. As for pipe dream all biotechs are a pipe dream. They have to raise capital and get their drugs into trials. Svacf has a lead drug that is approved in 15 countries, but not USA. VBI has 3 drugs they are working on with none in trials.

    VBI has an interesting way to allow to transport vaccines without cold storage. They will need capital or they will need to partner something. I look at this as a POC investment, where maybe the big boys take it over.

    Good management in VBI, poor management in Svacf. Lucky the VBI will be taking over once the deal is done. For info look at VBI website, they are presenting data this week. Has strong ties to GSK and I feel one day, that's where this will end up. I own a ton of this, once this deal gets done.

    I look for them to advance the hep B and partner something. But when is the difficult part to guess. You have to do your own DD on buying more. They will need more money. The RS could be anywhere from 1 for 25 to 1 for 50. It all depends on if they have some news.

  • billyteex1 billyteex1 Mar 10, 2016 9:59 AM Flag

    Ouch 324K shares. You are dumber then Vorlon. I read all your claims of buys. At $1.25, 1.20, 1.05, .91, .85, .75, .60, .50 and recent at .39. You are really good at this. Edgars left after I discovered his post about telling this would go up to $6 and then down to .50. He erased and ran away. You seem to like anyone that helps deceive investors.

    Interesting how I posted that the first id's to flee here would be Vorlon, Darrels and edgars. Uncanny how accurate I was on those calls. I also posted that this would trade in the .30's and now feel you will see the mid .20's.

    The CEO leaving is the tip of the iceberg. I would start getting your affairs in order.

  • Reply to

    NTTG are we the same ID?

    by billyteex1 Mar 9, 2016 8:03 AM
    billyteex1 billyteex1 Mar 9, 2016 10:50 AM Flag

    I have taken a side here. That is one of staying clear and looking at what we can actually verify. I didn't see anything attractive at $2 and I still at .39 do not see anything compelling to invest here. So I am on the side of caution, where you are on the side of trying to get your money back. As for your point about this Bill Jacobs, somehow that makes sense to you. The little I could google, really doesn't tie your point together. My guess this is a old pumper method to distract from the fact that your stock has no support.

    Guess losing your panties here, you want Bill Jacobs to fish them out of the river for you. No one can say you don't make a good drama queen. Sorry for your losses. But you were warned.

  • Reply to

    NTTG are we the same ID?

    by billyteex1 Mar 9, 2016 8:03 AM
    billyteex1 billyteex1 Mar 9, 2016 10:12 AM Flag

    Newtspewts,

    You had your chance last year to hold the moral high ground here. But you avoided this test also. It's evident that both the pumpers and bashers lack a little emotional stability. They both play games here, because of their little egos.

    NTTG will run from my test, vorlon, laurence, darrell, edgars ran from it. From my seat, you all look like fools. No wonder why you cannot get an intelligent discussion on yahoo. Instead of working together to make money, you too busy trying to one up each other.

  • Reply to

    NTTG are we the same ID?

    by billyteex1 Mar 9, 2016 8:03 AM
    billyteex1 billyteex1 Mar 9, 2016 10:04 AM Flag

    I don't ignore anyone. They have a right to question my motivates and I have the right to question their motives. Since you spend so much time here, I just thought you would want to clear the air. I didn't really come away with why you fear this. But I'm sure it would put a crimp in your style.

    How could I not be convinced if all the bashers posted at the same time. That makes absolute no sense. But I guess that's the best excuse you could come up with.

  • Reply to

    NTTG are we the same ID?

    by billyteex1 Mar 9, 2016 8:03 AM
    billyteex1 billyteex1 Mar 9, 2016 9:46 AM Flag

    To clean up our side. Do you use multiple id's here and if so, why? If you invent 3 id's then the pumpers invent 5 and then you need three more and where does it end. Most investors want the debate, but not the theater.

    Anyone can bash with numerous id's, but then the agenda has to be questioned. I get it, their side has always used multiple id's. They flood this with them and that makes it difficult to make your points, so you invent a few to combat. That is maybe why less and less tune into Yahoo. It's because of these games. So you end up talking to two posters, each with 10 id's. Congrats. I just thought you were a little smarter.

  • Reply to

    NTTG are we the same ID?

    by billyteex1 Mar 9, 2016 8:03 AM
    billyteex1 billyteex1 Mar 9, 2016 9:38 AM Flag

    Stop being such a drama queen about IV. What difference does it make? I don't like IHUB and IV. Was on IV when ASTX years ago. It had a only a few posters, so why waste my time. However, I will say the discussions were real. I get the feeling you want us on IV, because there is a way to get our personal info.

    A while back JXboxtas because he also got his ears slapped by me, went to following me around on other boards. Personally speaking, your stock just doesn't have anything real motivate me to hear your side of the story. You see, you lack the emotional tools to look at this objectively. That is a dangerous way to invest.

    Jxboxtas nice talking to you again. Wish you had the intellect to dig deeper here. but you sold yourself on this one, even with so many things that never materialize. Have this company deliver on something real and then maybe I will waste my time with you on IV. But right now, it would be very difficult to buy this one for any reason. It comes a time, when an investment has to produce something very positive and this one is a very long shot. I don't like management, I don't like that they diluted and lied.

    You are stuck in a down trending one and that is your problem.

  • Reply to

    NTTG are we the same ID?

    by billyteex1 Mar 9, 2016 8:03 AM
    billyteex1 billyteex1 Mar 9, 2016 9:10 AM Flag

    You didn't answer my question about showing that id's are separate. The pumpers ran from my simple test 16 months ago. Now our turn to show that id's are different.

    As for your point "not sure", why else would they pump BTD when they had zero chance of it happening. This is a two edge sword, they need money, they need news to help move shares. A little white lie can move a lot of shares. This stock was worth $1B on paper at one time, on the hype. I'm sure the company knows that they have to dangle a carrot, to move the toxic paper. Specially when they hadn't at the time had anything in phase 3.

    Now will you take my simple test? Yes or no and will you ask the other id's who are constantly bashing to join in.

  • billyteex1 billyteex1 Mar 9, 2016 8:42 AM Flag

    Been down this road with you before rory. I showed my trades and if you want, go look for my posts. But when you used the jxboxtas id, you claimed they were false. You wanted a snap shot of my account. So you are just doing the rope a dope. No one has this much time to baby sit a loser like you.

    The only thing you need to understand, is we just do not see anything real with this company. The CEO left dodge, just like darrel, vorlon, edgars. As for IV, you have your support group. You need to ly in bed with the same clowns that were telling investors BTD meant AA. That was a serious mistake on your part. You really have no clue, how that will come back to haunt you.

    If I am wrong about this one, I will be the first to admit it. But so far, everything I see, was just smoke and mirrors. Knowing you stuck in this, priceless. You can be a smug clown, but every morning you have to face the fact that you lost large here, with little hope of recovering.

  • Reply to

    NTTG are we the same ID?

    by billyteex1 Mar 9, 2016 8:03 AM
    billyteex1 billyteex1 Mar 9, 2016 8:29 AM Flag

    NTTG will you round up the bashers and we take a simple test? Then newtwethispants will have to come up with new logic why everyone with brains, stays away from this one.

  • Reply to

    NTTG are we the same ID?

    by billyteex1 Mar 9, 2016 8:03 AM
    billyteex1 billyteex1 Mar 9, 2016 8:27 AM Flag

    You are a pumper, if you cannot stand back and look at previous hype as what it really was. It was designed to dilute into it and keep paying themselves enormous wages for not living up to one single forward looking statement.

    As for your little digs, for a guy down 75%, you sure need to vent on others. My guess is you spent a lifetime blaming others, because you lack any actual intelligence.

    This is a message board and you believe it's your personal toilet. Take your head out of it, and smell what you got yourself into. You can insult all you want, that still not going to change your predicament.

SLW
19.50+0.52(+2.74%)May 6 4:01 PMEDT