8/6 dummy. You still whinny on how I spanked you. Did you find a legal dictionary and look up what "terms" are? You sound like dbtunr when you get your ears boxed.
I should have left the multiple id guys, play their game. I think we will be happy as soon as next week. Higher share price mends all fences. I guess maybe I will look at their games like this. If you have 6 id's and we have news, it only means 1/6 of what it means to us.
Okay bambi. Show me I'm wrong. I think you the one who forgot the working parts of this deal. You cannot say you have an average cost of .36 on SVAC. That is wrong and you should be ashamed. You have to back out the value of Lvvnf and then average the numbers. Or you you have to buy addition shares of the miner as well.
Arlo you cannot link to me if you have me on ignore. Since you just did, you are lying. I love how fokin stupid you are. You cannot make this stuff up. They have to make me the bad guy, because they are using deceit on these boards. BTW arlo you could have average cost of .48.
It was just a matter of time that bambi would show his colors.
We have the same group making math mistakes. They believe that because you paid .36 originally and you buy at .22 that you can average this together. to get figures near .30. But that .36 you paid included two stocks, so you have to remove that value.
So to start of with your averages right now. LVVNF is trading at .125. So basically it is .0625 of your .36 you originally paid. So your average cost is .2975. If you buy at .22 an equal amount of shares equal to your original buy, then you can average the .22 and .295 and you get .25875.
Why did you invent an ID just 3 days ago? Since then you have replied many times. My guess The k9 id or cdavis feeling the heat. If you paid .36, you have an average cost of .24 Lvvnf and .24 for SVACF. So if you are buying Svacf here at .22, you dropped your average maybe a penny at most. It all depends on the allocations. You have to asign some cost of your .36 to both companies. Please don't be K9, because we will be here for a week, getting him to understand this again.
Whose's taking to you. You too stupid to pass a simple test ARLO. That's why you have me on ignore, because you know I'm 100% right about your games. I'm just glad I didn't pay .36 a share like you.
They should have informed investor on how many are being recalled. The cost estimates. Buy putting the words Jan 1,2012, the uncertainty is magnified. This amateur hour. How long have they known about this is my first question. Why not announce this before the deal? Maybe afraid they wouldn't get their $19M?
Who knew what when?
Maybe this explains why the stock has traded down. So far the street is taking it with no over reaction. But I'm sure the FDA will be doing an inspection and see what safe guards in place. Hard to get any traction, when the first words we get are these.
All the same id. Look hard they work at alibi's. They could have proved me wrong in seconds. I look at it this way, the harder they try to run the more it becomes apparent I was right. On OPK board one id, is using 15 aliases. Here they have maybe 8 at the current time. Old miamianne cannot take a simple test on her gender.
Idiots. But they have to play it this way, because they cannot pass a simple test. This is the best thing they can think of to throw off the stink.
You seem to take things out of context on oil. You claim we hit $2, but that was at the end of 2008. Just like we are at right now in 2015. Oil shot up in 2009-2013. Just as gold and silver did. I stated, that this is feeling just like 2008 all over. That over the next three years oil will rise.
Oil fell right before the banking problems, just like it is now. Oil will go higher in my opinion.
Dk you getting that thing mimianne gave you taken care of? Interesting that they cannot pass a simple test.