Great PR unit here. No popcorn for the CC tomorrow. I suspect.
At least someone is thinking here. Good, and accurate, post. Time will vindicate you.
Sorry there will be no reaction. No diabetic wants to put this #$%$ in their lungs.
The wording of the court document leaves much unanswered. I noticed that ATT also had filed counter-claims. What were they and why?
Also, although the case was mutually dismissed by both parties, Spex (Guidance)'s claim was dismissed "with prejudice" meaning that the case is done; it cant be filed anywhere else. This usually bodes well with a settlement. However, whatever ATT's counterclaims were, on their end it was dismissed "w/o prejudice."
If this move is based on technicals, then play the technicals! Now it's a buy since we closed above the 50 DMA. Else wise, stop spouting rhetoric for the sake of rhetoric; it displays your ignorance.
"Verizon's deadline to respond to the Amended Complaint, subject to change by agreement of the parties or by Order of the Court, currently is August 15, 2014."
Cisco apparently responded on the 5th, ATT today....
CC Monday morning 8/18....
This all looks good.
Of course. What were you expecting from a health internet provider practically created by the corrupt kingpin Obama. He's not remotely interested in health reform!!
I would imagine revenue news --- that a health, research clinic, after examining the 3D liver, wishes to purchase a hefty order ....
Personally, I don't mind if you're short or long the stock. What is irksome to no avail, however, is the inability to form independent thoughts and proper analysis and logical argumentation. The recent SA article "NQ Mobile looks ripe for a turn around" is yet ANOTHER example in a long line of others that fail, time and time again to present clear cogent argument or even speculation. Here are its summary points --- all of them are BS.
" NQ Mobile has crashed this year as it is the subject of controversy, but the replacement of its auditor indicates that the long awaited annual report is on the way."
What the $@*(? This is representative of highschool "logic." In NO WAY does the replacing of the auditor "indicate" that the annual report is on its way. The replacing of the auditor can indicate numerous things! The ignorance here and inability to form proper logical conclusions tolerates me to the degree that this individual should be shot, maimed! The statement is NOT tenable, period!
"NQ received a clean #$%$ from an independent committee recently, denying that it has cooked its books."
It certainly did not. There were "missing data" or financial information. That is not a "clean" slate. Here the data is skewed.
" NQ's fundamentals, along with a solid growth rate, suggest that the company could be a good investment."
Wrong again. NQ's fundamentals are what's up in the air for the moment. We just don't know the state of them.
I'm a professor at a University. I would give this chap a D! In my classes we write argumentative papers with clear logical connections and conclusions that follow the variables. This is just grade A #$%$!
1) MW reported Jesus' return was a fraud, even though Jesus himself told his disciples he would return and the early church waited for centuries, which turned into mellennia --- some delusions just go on and on and on and on....
2) PwC, which is the antichrist, was just thrown down. Vindication is near !!
3) Mark himself said these famous words: "Watch and Learn."
Hope your astrology is better than your chart reading.
The only trend line posing any real resistance is the downward one going all the way back to March 18 when it closed at $20.44. That trend lins has served as resistance on any and all "pops." At today's close that trend line touches $5.50. A close above $5.50 is needed. with continuation tomorrow.
Another uninformed "investor". Might want to read the audited report. Your statement above IS NOT tenable per the original audited report --- thus why a second needs to be done.... and is frankly just being redirected and eventually avoided.