I'm sure this was probably a result of someone at this firm seeing Spencer's stupid article and deciding maybe they can find some angry shareholders and make a quick buck. I believe the angry shareholders decided not to file anything once the BOD finally acted to remove worthless, dangerous, destructive JL.
and redemption. This is a good product, good company, they have $400MM+ in cash, FDA approval of CG and are being taken down by shorts. This system is so corrupt, Govt and all.
I noticed he was not on the show yesterday. They do review worst calls, this one will be worst of the worst. CNBC might even get sued over this one.
I did the same, wrote a comment in the USPS-BS site, emails to IR and KC. I agree, shorts are trying to destroy this company and the shareholders. This is shameless, illegal and must be stopped. These people are evil and will burn!
I went to the web site and left my own comment, but did not see the comments of others. The bio-short criminals are really doing a number on this stock and company. I really detest these people and wish for burning coals to rain down on their head, or the jail time they deserve.
go to the USPS web site and tel them what you think.
I think it's time for these people to calm down and let the new leader do his job.
they did issue a PR that said they were searching for a replacement and they would be reviewing everything. Costs will be cut, all options are on the table, it's possible some programs will be stopped. We won't know the details for at least a few weeks or months. We have no idea if Jack left the company in a good pipeline shape, but just did not have the stones to make cuts, or was against a deal, or if he left the place in trouble. Since he was paid to leave, I suspect they are not in too much trouble, but who knows.
lots of junk stocks mentioned with the exception of ACAD, which still has some risk. Let me add some beaten down stocks to the list EXAS and ARNA. IMO, not advice but worth a look for at least a trade.
this conclusion was driven by bad math and the wrong assumptions. They assumed yearly use and multiplied by expected positive reading. They should have used every 3 years. Govt egg heads can't do proper math, or maybe they were compromised by the shorts???
I think it's more like $400MM in cash, no debt. Conroy is shareholder friendly, I think he will do his best to help the price recover. Dealing with a Govt agency wannabe is probably very frustrating.
EXAS now needs a big new reimbursement deal to show the market that insurers are not forced to follow this BS recommendation. How do we make comments, is the comment period open now? I've been waiting for my insurance co Cigna to provide reimbursement. My doc wrote a script over a year ago and didn't think twice when I asked him for it.
Here's one Govt Agency every candidate running for election should be ready to cut!