Of course it is. But it's all still bullshatt. Is there no way to break this machine and relegate it to the junkyard once and for all so the world can finally prosper?
Sure sounds like it can. welcome to the brave new world.
@@@@Nebulizer: Alcohol powder that is molecular encapsulated with cyclodextrin can be used with a nebulizer for easier inhalation into the lungs than the ordinarily harsh vapors.
Did you honestly think that BTC would be trading at $500 in view of the numerous adverse events stacked against it so far this year? So far your thesis of BTC2Zero is unproven... why do you think that is? Spare me the BS and just answer honestly for a change.
I admit even I am somewhat surprised it has held its value so well. The start of trading in the BTC ETF and Trust later this year will likely prove to be a watershed moment in the history of BTC. I am convinced these will only serve to strengthen its long-term viability.
And what do you say to the many born into famine and disease through no fault of their own? What do you say to those who suffer simply to survive let alone acquire any form of basic education that might permit them to identify what is rational and what is not?
Huh? A P/E of 12 corresponds to an earnings yield of ~8.3%. With the 10yr bond at 2.7% that puts the BEER at 2.7/8.3=0.32 which points to either a grossly undervalued stock market or highly overpriced bond market. So unless you expect bond yields to spike up to the mid single digit range when the market crashes your estimate seems way off.
"Your whole bitcoins can never be hacked view has turned out to 100% incorrect as shown by the hundreds of millions (if not billions) of dollars already lost on bitcoins because of vary hacking related thefts"
I called BS on your 100% incorrect statement,.as anyone with technical knowledge will attest to the fact that the BTC protocol proper was never hacked, only custom coded applications that work with it, and you accuse me of 'parsing words'. It's obvious you are weak on logic and choose instead to obfuscate matters rather than present logical arguments to support your claims. You lose, plain and simple.
That was not a low blow... it's not my fault you're an idiot if you believe T/A can actually predict the future (assuming you really do think that).
Right... I never said I was an expert at the markets. But I do question the quality of your arguments. And pulease avoid the low blows... I don't ever read ZH... ever,
Correction... this is not an ETF. In any case, the point where this trust and the ETF proposed by the Winklevoss twins come to market will mark an interesting point in the destiny of BTC. For the first time ever, mainstream investors will have direct input on determination of the 'fair value' of BTC. I doubt very much they will value it at zero as Mr. BTC2Zero aka Trollalert proposes. Time will tell...
I am a highly rational person and easily recognize logical thinking when I encounter it.
I would hardly call presentation of a logical statement to refute your claim 'parsing words'. You fail to grasp the fundamental technology of BTC and it continues to show in your comments on the subject.
T/A serves as a tool to identify potential outcomes based on past behavior. It cannot predict the future and any event(s) can alter the market direction from the ones T/A points to. To deny that fact is idiotic and I won;t waste time discussing it further
I seriously doubt someone like you could possibly 'forget' the Einstein thing. A far as global warming goes, I stated my view and I stand by it. The effects of manmade greenhouse gases are only part of the overall equation of global thermal balance and external )non-human) factors must also be considered. I don't believe pud has ever disputed this fact.
I consider myself very open-minded person so I am somewhat offended by your comments.
I disagree completely with your assertion that BTC has been hacked. It is insecure exchanges that have in fact been hacked, NOT the protocol itself... huge difference there bud. BTC is still nowhere near zero which is the target that would vaildate your view of its validity.
And while I think T/A has value, I believe pud is simply trying to point out that it does not predict the future... a point that I agree with.
I think the scientific evidence properly predicts the effects of greenhouse gases on earth's thermal balance. The fact is that is there are many other external natural factors that combine with manmade effects to ultimately determine whether or not the earth experiences global warming or cooling.
Now the 'Einstein is wrong' deal is another matter altogether. I think he got in over his head there but he did fight impressively hard to dig it out (not hard enough to succeed though I know his ego will not let him admit it).
Not sure what you mean... I don't pardon him... that was the reason I responded to his post And I'm not aware who I crossed that I am supposed to pardon?
I am not convinced pud is psychotic. Indeed, he is quite rational in his arguments. I suspect he simply chooses to play the role of antagonist for whatever reason.
The point is not whether (a) god exists or not, but a matter of having basic respect towards all members of the human race, regardless of their physical or mental condition. It is part of what makes us human.
I know very well the history attributable to religion, and while I abhor the destructive aspects associated with much of it, I do not accept that those actions of masses should extend to the individual. Respect each person and their respect is warranted in return. Tolerate the beliefs of others even if you don't agree with them. These are principles fundamental to the functioning of a civilized world.
What did god personally do to you to warrant such sheer vehemence and intolerance towards others for their religious beliefs? Obviously something, otherwise it's hard to think you are a normal functioning human. No atheist or scientist I know would act in such a rude and insulting manner to fellow humans. No one is perfect... and that most certainly includes you.