Sat, Jul 12, 2014, 9:55 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed


% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Starbucks Corporation Message Board

boar292hog 187 posts  |  Last Activity: 6 hours ago Member since: Mar 24, 2005
  • ....on Cramer.....maybe ringing the bell.........................share price performance seems to hint at someone wanting to buyout SD at or near 10 bucks.

    You see the higher SD runs today and looking forward, the higher that bid needs to move above 10 bucks to be attractive to shareholders.

    Well in my view, it already is you see, its all about the ASSETS in the ground, as I have said time after time!

    I will vote no for a 10.00 sale, I want a Min. of 12 bucks now.......increasing cashflow/revs......the tech ability to further exploit existing reserves not to mention potential discovery and all, at an industry LOW regarding cost of drill/extraction..........frankly, there is now a new asset SD has to offer, the Bennett Leadership team and innovative drilling tech. at a lower cost.

    Whomever the SHORT(s) is, its time to cover and take the collar off you ACK-JASS(es).

  • Mr Bennett is moving from being a younger less well known oil patch participant to becoming known as a FIXER even a Patch Player, able to takes todays technology and apply it to other than traditional patch circumstances and MAKE MONEY ! As SD's performance rises we shareholders and Mr Bennett and his team do as well!

    Two notes: large options position today...will-or-could, drag share price climb until expiration date....seems likely the BIG SHORT did this to allow enough time for an exit but hey, who knows!? I sure don't ! AND.....drum roll...............SHORTs have simply got to get out of the way on this one!

    Feels good co-holders! Oh and all IMHO..........of course!

  • as it moves into the limelight! Excuse me WALL STREET, a 58% increase in EBITDA YOY.......and analysts were expecting 09. cents earnings FOR ALL OF 2014 and here we are in Q 1 w/.07 cents!

    I still think Wall Street beyond those following SD currently, won't open their own eyes TO CHANGE regarding SD until it bumps 8 bucks! Which in my view is imminent! Adding up to an absolute dis-service to those they serve, their own customers. OOPS!

    SHORTs need to remove the CUPs and put on the chastity belt............IMHO !

  • CHK...met...exceeded...POUNDED analysts earnings forecasts......OOPS!

    Meanwhile, the low cost operater, with increasing production rates, SD to be specific.......oh well, I can only guess......but..........hmmmm, I think SD surprises to the upside and offers up a nice forward outlook.............for the FOURTH QUARTER ( or would this make 5 now?) in a row! Yowzaaaaa! All IMHO !

  • ASSUME THE POSITION naysayers cause I believe you are about to get kicked right where it hurts the most! LMAO! .............and of course, all IMHO ! BAMMMMMMMMMMMMMM !

  • Reply to

    Whats wrong w/AMTD's site!?

    by boar292hog May 6, 2014 7:00 PM
    boar292hog boar292hog May 6, 2014 8:32 PM Flag

    OOPS! Meant SBUX ! Not SBIX !

  • I see SBIX has a PE of 352...........I watched the EPS (TTM) CHANGE...3 times today, it went from .20 cents to .17 .18 cents and back now to .17 cents?!!

    I called AMTD and asked if they had someone who could educate me on the new math involved in computing a PE ! The rep i spoke to said he had a PE of around 125 which was about right for the most recent earnings and today prive of around 70 when I called.

    He then pulled up his own site and wow....when I was saying I read a PE of 407 he was reading 352....I laughed and said its BEEN FLICKERING between about 252 and 407............he thanked me for pointing out the flaw and said he would followup on the matter internally...........I didn;t ask him to contact me back but prior to calling, i sent off 3 emails asking for an explanation and have not heard back.

    I sure hope it isn't a sign that AMTDs site/data etc. have been somehow compromised. While I know AMTD gets this data from another source, one has to wonder what is going on with anyone and everyone involved with this nonsense. Note, yahoo Finance shows the same bogus data ref. PE ratio, for what its worth.

  • Reply to

    SBUC PE is only 352!

    by boar292hog May 6, 2014 11:38 AM
    boar292hog boar292hog May 6, 2014 1:19 PM Flag

    LMAO! Thanks EXPERT ! Whatever CONDUIT of information is created for public consumption within the investment arena needs to be accurate. its the law.
    Further, while I don;t expect yahoo and its source of such data to be perfect, I do expect them to at least EFFFFFFFFFFing try. Just so you know njsupreemey! It is not YAHOO, it is their source which many others also use.

    This might mean there is a kink in their data system which could mean a compromise has occured or, a fat finger...or some dolt millenial who has ZERO CLUE about how to do their job.

    But njsupreme1, place on ignore...its easy to do! LMAO!

  • Reply to

    SBUC PE is only 352!

    by boar292hog May 6, 2014 11:38 AM
    boar292hog boar292hog May 6, 2014 12:31 PM Flag

    hey njsupreme1, the PE on SBUX is wrong! maybe you, your Hinass, can fix it? LMAO!

  • boar292hog by boar292hog May 6, 2014 11:38 AM Flag

    EPS TTM keeps chaning, yesterday it was 20 cents, early this morning 17 cents and right now, its 18 cents!

    FRAUD.............deliberate fraud...and YAHOO you are culpable despite Morningstar supplying the data.

    Explain your methodology Morningstar....Yahoo.........or explain whats going on..........has PUTIN decided to start up a rating agency or what!? LMAO !

  • Gosh so far that slower economy from last quarter that Dunkin reported as an issue and this most recent quarter WINTER weather seemed to hinder Dunkin..and I would have thought colder weather would drive UP coffee and GRONKBAR sales!

    Yet, SBUX seemed to stretch for that last lap with a healthy SPRINT and a solid look forward...........HMMMM....LMAO!

  • For erroneous data. Viewing Morningstars PE ratio of nearly 350 on SBUX is unbelievable! It makes one wonder how Yahoo Finance allows such FALSE data to fall into the hands of Mom-n-Pops who are just learning what it is they are doing ref./ investing.

    Of course there is no means of contacting Yahoo or Morningstar directly for an explanation or to point out the error so i guess YAHOO has chosen to accept thrid world accuracy on its FINANCE PAGES.

  • Reply to

    Clive Bundy a racist?

    by trmmara Apr 26, 2014 11:05 AM
    boar292hog boar292hog May 1, 2014 2:20 PM Flag

    LMAO! R U some self righteous EVERYONE else is wrong dolt? You should be asking why Bundy is not paying. The so called BILL DODGERS you refer too nearly brought this nation into default, does the mortgage debacel ring a bell. This is ONE GUY who has issues with the FEDs having taken over land that his Family used for grazing for over a century.
    I don't think anyone, including Bundy thinks this is over. The FEDs should have used other less expensive means to solve this issue verses physical confrontation via an excessive show of force.

    How many MILLIONS were spent just getting 200 armed personnel on site? I mean who makes these bogus decisions!? I maintain my view that if the GOV'T WANTED Koresh, Weaver, or Bundy, then there are/were far more cost effective and less hostile means of doing so. Or maybe you have alittle too much COWBOY in you to THINK your way through an issue thus jeopardizing anyone and everyone under you, around you, relying on you etc. You know, like the IDIOT who ran the WACO disaster.

    One last thing, everytime the government uses a show of force, it creates a growing anti-gov't crowd. Ask any Af. American who was around in the 1950's 1960's who watched essentially government sanctioned discrimination and used a definate show of force when cities nationwide were burning down around riot ruled streets. I hope you are not a PR person for any entitiy! LMAO! Wink, wink!

  • Reply to

    WFC commercials! LMAO!

    by boar292hog May 1, 2014 12:40 PM
    boar292hog boar292hog May 1, 2014 1:42 PM Flag

    Shareholder? Sorry to "P" on your parade! First MUNG, risk analysts, as well as internal legal departments constantly browse publically available data looking for the improper release of interanl information, as an example. So welcome to the big world! It's not just the NSA who monitors EVERYTHING they can!

    I think WFC is a decent bank, I don't like their fee structure which I believe barely even pays for its own administration of such...............however, I think they can improve in their marketing department. I'll let you have the last word because you are a waste of time! Sorry Mung, it's true........go get another espresso 4shots....

  • Reply to

    WFC commercials! LMAO!

    by boar292hog May 1, 2014 12:40 PM
    boar292hog boar292hog May 1, 2014 1:01 PM Flag

    Mung! Did it hurt! I thought I might get a WFC employee to bite and run, are you a WFC employee?

    Yes it is a free country and all i did was provide some FREE feedback to WFC, not you! Remember Mung, it is a FREE Country so you can place me on ignore or skip reading my posts!

    Oh and I'll choose however many sources of information/views/data I wish too regarding the markets! But thanks for your FREE COUNTRY input! LMAO............did it hurt?

  • boar292hog by boar292hog May 1, 2014 12:40 PM Flag

    "Sydny needs some fiancial advice so she....." or words to that effect. Well here's some Public Relations advice for WFC! Saturation marketing, like your stupid commercial on CNBC being played every single commercial breal gets old in a hurry. In fact, it really gets old.

    I was wondering if you all at WFC would be willing to make it even worse for your image by asking CNBC to play your commercial every 5 minutes instead of every 10 minutes so we can measure the damage that saturation marketing can do? Getting the word out and POUNDING VIEWERS are two different things. Why anyone would follow the Charter Communications PR plan by POUNDING ITS VIEWERS who are already customers is poor judgement and in the end, a waste of money.

  • Reply to

    Clive Bundy a racist?

    by trmmara Apr 26, 2014 11:05 AM
    boar292hog boar292hog May 1, 2014 1:02 AM Flag

    Wow! Right over your head dear! I am not defending Bundy and the grazing issue, I am criticizing the Federal ownership of NV and the way the FEDs handle these situations NEEDLESSLY placing folks, including their own personnel, into harms way where no such escalation or show of pwer was necessary.
    I spent too many years in the military dear, to watch the Waco deal go down the way it did. An officer in the military would have gone to Leavenworth for 20-50 years (mil. jail). The clown in charge in Waco violated his own warning order and HE, got his own people killed as well as the escalation that followed which led to the deaths of 22 children. Koresh is who they wanted but for some reason, they decided to storm the walls if you will. I have a very good friend who was at Waco and gee guess what, he was not and is not in law enforcement, he wore another uniform if you will.
    I suggest you eliminate your emotions and passive judgement on people whose opinions you disagree with by trying to dehumanize them.

    I would gladly go to Ukraine, we should have finished the Russian job when it was still the Soviet Union, when they clearly deserved anything and everything we could throw at them. But, we're the nice guys, the good guys and we are condemned to give way to people like you who have ZERO clue about anything unless you hear on CNN ! LMAO! Have a good life Dear, the world you live in is the world your kind has built! You should LOVE PUTIN and his puppets in Ukraine cause you sure don;t sound like anyone who has ever placed their own rearend on the line for anything or anyone but themselves. Can ya hear me now? LMAO!

  • F has a PE of roughly 9 and GM is at 18, thats ugly. It is also grossly undervaluing F and over valuing Gov'TMotors.

    F is unveiling 23 new models this year, around the world, with new models comes bliss and sometimes pain, no one is perfect. However, watching what GM is going thru right now as well as recent recalls pretty much across the board, one can assume the auto industry is getting much better and attention to detail as well as prototype testing.

    That said, F expects an earnings growth from now thru 2015 of 41% and another 21% plus in 2016. Conservative figures in my view assuming we see F continue to dominate the landscape in China as well as F's obvious rebound in Europe not to mention the average US consumers car age of 13 years now meaning at some point, Grandma and Grandpa are going to buy that one last car to carry them thru, if you will.

    F is GROSSLY underpriced, sometimes I think it is some unwritten rule by either the FEDs or the auto industry itself trying to help GM not look so bad by keeping F from climbing to new heights.

    Pensions are a ghost that can not be ignored in the auto industry and F has the best grasp of funding its pensions in the industry so this is yet another seldom talked about liability that chrysler and gm still face.

    So when a Stern agee comes out and issues a price target of 20, i have to laugh, I understand the game, under forecast but make it juicy enough for clients to buy, for brokers to sell their clients but F should already be at 20 and working its way into the mid 20's on future growth and earnings expectations alone. 2014 is a lackluster eanrings year for F because of the 23 new models however, don't be surprised if F outruns expectations despite this years new modle roll out costs. While it won;t be overnight, CHina is keenly interested in slowly moving to a consumption economy meaning, the emergence of a much larger middle class than today. Add this ti Euro/N.Amer. and YOWZA! IMHO!

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    Clive Bundy a racist?

    by trmmara Apr 26, 2014 11:05 AM
    boar292hog boar292hog Apr 29, 2014 11:43 PM Flag

    By the way, the answer is simple, the FEDs like to set an example when they see UNREST like this, if you will. Which led to 22 children needlessly dying in Waco, and Weavers Dog and SON being killed BEFORE the FEDs even told Weaver they were there!

    Now thats some pretty good law enforcement....being so secret that you just KILL without identifying yourself wehile pretending to wanbt to capture a guy who missed his court date...........BECAUSE the date was changed and he was not notified....and for selling an illeglally short shotgun which, turned out to be legal. Google it. We have really inexperienced DOLTS making the calls in these situations.

    The DOLT inWACO ignored his own warning order to break off and abandon the mission if they lost the element of surprise. When the FBI discovered they had lost the element of surprise, they proceeded, contrary to their own boundaries set.......shortly there after is when we all saw the guys on the roof get zipped and fall of the roof, DEAD.
    If our government has any interest at all in reaching out to folks who distrust, dislike, even outright HATE DC, then they sure messed up with the latest Keystone Cop satire of law enforcement at the Bundy's.

  • Reply to

    Clive Bundy a racist?

    by trmmara Apr 26, 2014 11:05 AM
    boar292hog boar292hog Apr 29, 2014 11:36 PM Flag

    The question that should be asked is this, WHY, didn;t the FEDs arrest him while he was in Vegas or out and about? Or, why didn;t they issue a summons/lawsuit?

    The FEDs could have caught Koresh in town, Weaver in town, and Bundy in town but for sime reason, these hollywood like FEDs have their heads buried up their rearends. What a bunch of ACK-JASSES the FEDs are.........

78.60-0.25(-0.32%)Jul 11 4:00 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.
Potbelly Corporation
NasdaqGSFri, Jul 11, 2014 4:00 PM EDT
LTC Properties Inc.
NYSEFri, Jul 11, 2014 4:04 PM EDT