If that volume can't convince investors APPL is on board- then what device or means will establish credibility?
Articles are a start- but someone with unique insight into the technology (WATTUP) would need to paint the landscape background in a more focused picture/lens. Without such authorities- tech, analyst or industry pundits on board- the trading game will permeate without the likelihood of a major (sustainable) updraft in price? Outside of the technological challenges present with WC- it would seem market participants would affix a probability factor to PPS relative to commercialization prospects? As it stand no takers or believers outside the tunnel vision of a select few promotional pieces floating out there for thirst readers.
Squeeze is a non-event here. There was 5 mil share trading and gains erased rather quickly. Looks like flipping burgers vs owning an interest in a high rise property!
Pump will roll over in tell-tale form. Distressed company and no future in AR/VR as valuation indicates left for dead. Rally is done!
Most terrifying question is your not in control of your final behavior. Instead, your posts are only normative of a man with a disappointing dream.
Go- read about margin and basis for raising dollar requirements. Your in denial or worse, have you forgot the stock dropped half its value before that? Your fell down the same well as the Seeking Alpha pumpers. Get with reality- mgmt has done a crummy job of creating conviction in the story. Additionally, hired poor underwriters who can't support shares and a sales chief who believed the dream enough to walk off the field!
Your dreaming about a SQ. And the margin equates to greater risk and volatility. MGMT has blown it in terms of reaching credibility or sponsorship of stock. Valuation says it all: trading below secondary, no large insider ownership, no deal flow in volume and scant (fly by night) Analyst if any coverage. Think about it, the possibility of the largest value company in cahoots and the Street ain't biting. Use your head and realize- the story isn't being built properly nor permeating in the minds of interested parties.
The only thing that will lift the stock is some miracle in the form of: partnership with well known, equity buy in or indication that AAPL is in bed with WATT? MGMT has proven they can't talk their way into credibility with street, analyst or any others. Shorts are the leaders of the camp till the cows round the moon!. I'd thought we could charge vs rout? Low management ownership is another dead give away.
The verdict of competent judgement has you as one who circulates synthetic propositions.
They sell securities at distressed prices and EMAN has what to sell? Once the military gravy goes- then how do you prop up the turkey share price. VR unit sales need to be in the many millions of components sold to create meaningful revenues. This is a trading stock board with a blog to assist in working stories. Any stories which could convince unknowing investors that somehow EMAN is a part of the next big thing! In this way- they work the trade (bag holders).
- You want the heavier volume as that indicates the battle of supply and demand will tilt one way or another (buyers in my eyes). Heck if PACB can super-size volume on 10% of the float on buyout- imagine that Watt has something to say? GL- terrible underwriters and cronies!