No, not Pilo_dogsh1t or little Jimmy. I'm talking about HRC. Did you know the mendacious, lying, nagging fishwife is a brown eyed brunette? Hmmm?
That's right, she wears blue contact lenses. Now why, would you ask, would she do that? The answer is Gennifer with a G, as in Gennifer Flowers. Seems she has tried (and failed) to look like slick willies best looking conquest. Of course willie has moved on to considerably younger "companions" with Epstein on that magical Florida island (wait till THAT comes out), so it is all in vain for the bitter, angry, shrill, woman scorned.
Hmmm, can you say fragile mental case? Do we actually want a mental case hag as President? Perhaps not?
Jimmy, who claims to "work" for Microsoft while posing trash all day every day to the MO board, calls someone else "lazy".
Honestly, you can't make up sh1t this stupid. Really, you can't.
The socialist party is going to try to force the lying old battle axe down their sheep's (e.g. Pilo_dogsh1t) throat. If successful, the young vote will be very depressed in the general. If unsuccessful, they will have an avowed socialist as their candidate and lose the general in a landslide.
Either way, with Trump (loser) and Cruz (liar) now damaged, whoever emerges as the GOP nominee will win. Then the GOP will control EVERYTHING, and be able to nominate 4 SCOTUS justices (including replacing 2 liberals with Neanderthals).
But by all means, keep chanting "demographics is destiny" like Pilo_dogsh1t does. We need you to be overconfident. You know, as in propagandized? Right Jimmy, carci, vermin, and Gerry?
Who cares? I love my warm winter this year.
#$%$ you worthless POS. If you want to slow warming, LOG OFF THE COMPUTER and stop wasting electricity.
That would be Hitlery. This lying monstrosity thinks screaming is charisma. Good gawd, someone get this depraved hag off the stage before America's men commit hari kari.
I think, in the end, America will do what slick willy has always done - choose anyone but Hillary.
OK, good. So the energy comes from both, not just the sun? ROFLMFAO. Now then, let's continue: Where does the energy in fossil fuels originate from?
Hint, it is not the ground. Yuck, yuck, yuck. This is fun. I feel like Lucy with poor Charlie Brown.
So are you saying the heat came from the greenhouse gases? Or from the sun? Which is it?
P.S. idiot, I'm still waiting for you to tell me why the polar vortex was over North America instead of Asia last winter. Seems you "forgot" to apply your infinite GW induced weather wisdom to that topic.
Now then, answer my questions. Thanks.
[Once again, you fell into the trap.]
OK nutcase, I'll bite. Please answer your question: "Where is the heat energy coming from?"
Please be specific about the source. Thanks.
This promises to be VERY funny.
P.S. "sky high" ocean temperatures are not what causes el nino, you idiot. El ninos have been around since WAY before the industrial revolution.
Now then, answer the question.
Here is the complex answer that both befuddles you and enrages you.
GW was responsible for the drought, AND the drought relief. Yes idiot, GW has multiple effects that are unpredictable.
Now run along junior
ROFLMFAO, the idiot thinks GW is the cause of weather that ANY serious meteorologist will tell you with near 100% confidence is due to El Nino.
Is this some kind of a prank by the yale guys? NO ONE is this stupid.
Scientific illiterate: [The exploding storm acts a remarkably efficient heat engine, drawing warm air from the tropics to the top of the Earth.]
So what exactly is "exploding" idiot? An explosion usually involves a chemical reaction. Is it TNT? Or is it your empty noggin reacting to a sudden pressure change? Hmmmm chicken little?
P.S. How is that permanent drought in Texas holding up? You know the one caused by manmade GW? Also, what exactly do you mean by "heat engine"? Hmmmm?
[Your angst about me is just a pseudo-intellectual dodge to control your rage about the fact that your kind are terrified of allowing all citizens the right to vote.]
So says the cut and paste mental invalid. All right idiot, prove that "voter intimidation" as "your kind" (the stupid kind) refers to it resulted in any actual reduction in voting. In the last two elections, n****** voted in higher percentage than whites did. WHAT IS YOUR POINT IDIOT?
LOL. As if the idiot can actually formulate a response without cutting and pasting it. And no, letting illegals vote is not a response.
[Bernie BEATS both The Donald and Hillary by 16 points]
Hmmm, its seems you are a complete mental invalid. A raving nutcase parrot of leftist talking points. Now even Vermin won't dispute that.
Yuck, yuck, yuck.
[Can you please just show me the part that made you conclude Sanders was 16 percent ahead of Clinton, and leave out the rest?]
You should know better than to ask this. He is a brain dead fool who is easily propagandized by leftist pundits. He can't think for himself. In other words, an ignorant moonbat liberal. Also, a mathematics illiterate with a "counseling degree" from Texas Women's University where they allow in freshman with 800 combined SAT scores.
But you knew all this. You can't be too critical since he is a fellow liberal. Carry on. Has Susan been keeping you busy? Haven't seen as much of you. Oh, silly me, I'm sure you have been over on the MELA board. Never mind.
LOL, so says the amateur psychologist who happens to be completely obsessed with Scot Walker. Why? Because Walker tried to stop his taxpayer funded government gravy train. I hope now that Walker has nothing to lose, he makes massive cuts to your pension and retiree healthcare. Why should you get to live high on the hog when the private sector doesn't? Does Democrat "policy" against the "haves" exclude former government "workers"?
What a hack. It is people like you that give the government a bad name.
This is where the hack will say "why race to the bottom", blah, blah, blah, "the private sector should pay the same pensions as public", blah, blah, blah. Completely and blissfully insulated from the real world economy of market competition. But, by all means, you stay there on planet moonbat. I know you are happy there. You know, in your cocoon?
Better question is where are all the Democrat blowhards that scold the "speculators" when prices go up? I guess short selling speculation is OK for oil.
Of course, I wouldn't have expected someone as stupid as you to figure that out all by your self. And oddly it didn't pop up in the leftwing blogosphere, so you wouldn't know about it.
The farcical Jimmy, a "full time employee" (no really, just ask him), who posts trash all day, every day to the MO board calls someone else lazy. LOL.
Just friggen LOL.
Hey stupid, did you hear that Trump is now reinforcing the "Hillary is a liar" meme? Most people KNOW it is true already. They just need to be reminded by the guy with the big megaphone. By the time the general rolls around, it will be like "Jeb is low energy"; i.e. an obvious statement of fact. It won't even matter who is running against her. I can see the ads now with a montage of her contradicting herself over the e-mails, Bosnia, etc.
I hope Trump starts in on Bill Clinton's trips to the underage Brothel in the Caribbean soon too. That will be positively hysterical.
Is it "oppression" to KNOW that women and minorities at your place of employment make more than white men who do better work? That white men are not eligible for the special raise and promotion pools that occur occasionally to enhance our "diversity" numbers? In my profession, white and Asian males are simply MUCH better than women and non-Asian minorities. I don't suppose you would know since you never had access to that sort of management data since you have been a loser at every career that you tried.
Kill yourself. Please. Liz told me to suggest that. I'm sure you could get one of your American patriot neighbors in Texas to loan you a gun. I'm SURE they HATE YOUR GUTS, so they would be happy to.
So stupid, you are predicting a Trump candidacy?
A few questions:
1. Do you know how the delegates from the first 26 states are distributed (proportionally or winner take all)?
2. Do you think Trump will continue to run even if it appears he may lose?
You really are stupid, so I expect you will answer both questions wrong.