yes...a White House petition drive to remove the dissenting
ADCOM members and the FDA staff from ever
commenting on DMD issues ever again...I love that approach.
Highlight their ignorance on a vast scale.
Alexander IS terrible. As a "moderator", it's obvious he is one sided.
The FDA is all about process. The "PROCESS" is more important than
people. I have heard that, and after viewing this ADCOM, I know this
is the FDA's mantra. Too bad we don't live in ancient times where
we could stone these charlatans to death in the public square.
going to the gun range... maybe I can farkas up some targets...
I think you mean Dr. Dunn.
Farkas (as the name sounds) is a tool, also.
I have added that to my vocabulary...more of an adverb though, and used along
the lines of derision, e.g. "Look at that, he just got Farkas'ed." So be it.
1) The patients don't have "years".
2) The FDA's reputation cannot be tarnished much more than it has.
3) Only 3 panel members appeared to be competent in the DMD field,
so how does the FDA work any way? Just look at the 7 questions.
Obviously, they aren't walking, that's a visual mistake...Hey,Farkas is an eye doc, it could happen.
The stock's track record for the last few weeks validates that insiders and large players have the inside track
on the docs and planned release dates...