Fri, Aug 29, 2014, 11:51 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed


% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

International Business Machines Corporation Message Board

bot_feeder 104 posts  |  Last Activity: Aug 28, 2014 1:30 PM Member since: Sep 13, 1999
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • bot_feeder by bot_feeder Jul 24, 2014 10:00 AM Flag

    Posted a message but I don't see it here.

    I thought TER would get massacred today, since it looked to me like off hours it was down around 16.2. Anyway, glad it didn't get hammered too badly.

    This is a great company and any hiccups are in my opinion bound to be temporary.

    I would imagine a lot of the Q and A will be: How come the dismal outlook for next quarter?

  • bot_feeder by bot_feeder Jul 24, 2014 9:37 AM Flag

    Opened in high 18.xx. Looking at off hours price I thought it was going to be around 16.20 or so.

    Just goes to show, a company with a great business and excellent balance sheet can have some depressing news and not necessarily get whacked too badly on stock price.

  • bot_feeder by bot_feeder Jul 23, 2014 11:06 AM Flag

    Enterprise value to gross profits ratio about 7, AFTER today's drop. Yahoo shows estimated growth rate going forward of 8%.

    Without even reading their report yet, it doesn't seem very surprising to me this stock dropped. There are a lot of tech stocks sporting EV/GP ratios of 3-4 with projected growth rates going forward of about 10%.

    By that standard, XLNX looks quite expensive.

  • bot_feeder by bot_feeder Jul 21, 2014 11:29 AM Flag

    INFN clearly has some leading edge technology. And they have a good balance sheet.

    However, it appears that does not necessarily make them the winner in this market. CIEN seems to be getting a lot of business lately and even though they lack INFN's pic technology, their expertise in packet switching seems to allow them to provide something pretty competitive at the systems level. On the other hand, their balance sheet is not very good for a tech company so I can't see owning CIEN.

    Another thing that concerns me somewhat is I don't see a steady stream of new customer news announcements like we were seeing a year or so ago.

    Bottom line, while INFN's technology appears to be very impressive, not all the evidence seems to support INFN necessarily being a winner.

    I am an adherent of the Jesse Jackson school of investing: "When in doubt, get out."

    So I sold my INFN. Now that probably means it will skyrocket, since the stocks I was right on the borderline as to whether to own and decided not to have shot up, while the ones I have stuck with have just plodded along.

    But I have to go with what seems to make sense based on the pros and cons. If they show a disappointing quarter and the stock drops a bunch, then I might decide the reward to risk ratio is more attractive once again and I might get back in. If they show a good quarter and the stock goes up, then I will figure the horse is out of the barn and I will need to look for the diamonds in the rough that have not yet been recognized.

  • bot_feeder by bot_feeder Jul 14, 2014 9:19 AM Flag

    One might think HLIT is a good buy in the low 6's, but I have no confidence that this company will get its act together.

  • Reply to

    This Company is complete and utter dogsh1t.

    by concurx2 Jul 8, 2014 12:22 PM
    bot_feeder bot_feeder Jul 8, 2014 12:26 PM Flag

    They've got excellent products, but if they lack critical mass business-wise, then semiconductor manufacturers are not going to trust that the company will be around for the long haul, and will consider it too risky to buy their products.

  • Reply to

    $33K Profits

    by jeanmandellsvj May 23, 2014 3:49 AM
    bot_feeder bot_feeder Jul 1, 2014 12:53 PM Flag

    I just can't believe all the money I've made in the spam business.

  • Reply to

    B Y R O N is the best

    by boronmangle Jun 27, 2014 12:17 PM
    bot_feeder bot_feeder Jun 27, 2014 12:19 PM Flag

    The truth is probably somewhere in between.

  • Reply to


    by fnsrmsft Jun 25, 2014 12:07 PM
    bot_feeder bot_feeder Jun 25, 2014 12:23 PM Flag

    Being best of breed should help assure they are still around when after their weaker competitors have died off. In the long term there are all sorts of perils, China competition, disruptive new technologies. But I feel pretty comfortable with FNSR for the medium term.

  • Reply to

    INFN=CIEN without 600 million debt

    by boughtatprice Jun 25, 2014 11:44 AM
    bot_feeder bot_feeder Jun 25, 2014 12:16 PM Flag

    Their balance sheet is indeed one reason I own INFN stock and not CIEN. Balance sheet isn't everything, but I do believe the odds tend to be tipped in favor of those companies that have the stronger balance sheets.

  • bot_feeder by bot_feeder Jun 25, 2014 11:03 AM Flag

    Seems to me FNSR has dropped enough to warrant buying a little.

  • bot_feeder by bot_feeder Jun 23, 2014 4:38 PM Flag

    Noticed the article about Goldman Sachs saying some of these comm hardware companies are prime buyout candidates. OK, sure Goldman Sachs sucks as a company but that doesn't mean they don't have some smart people here and there within their organization.

    I bought some Calix. There are a lot of techs that I like as companies but their stocks are up a lot and I am a value investor. Calix looks like a good buy. Listened to their conf call, one of the callers mentioned Adtran is their largest competitor. Adtran was also mentioned in that GS article. Calix looks like a somewhat better value to me but I bought some Adtran as well.

    Seems like the main upside for companies in this biz is if they can tap heavily into the hitherto virtually untapped international market.

    Any grizzled veterans who have followed CALX and ADTN a while who know who their foreign competitors might be and how formidable you feel those are in competing with them for market share?

  • bot_feeder bot_feeder Jun 23, 2014 1:58 PM Flag

    The bottom line: High speed data transmission is a growth industry, yet companies in that business have stocks that are not at particularly lofty valuations. I don't feel real confident on which are the best prospects, but I do have a feeling that in the aggregate these are going to do very well.

  • bot_feeder bot_feeder Jun 23, 2014 1:56 PM Flag

    That Goldman article is also of interest to me because it provides some new investment ideas. Silver Springs, Adtran, and Calix.

    Those all look interesting to me. Pretty good values in terms of financial ratios and they all are projected to have about 10% annual revenue growth according to Yahoo's figures. That is similar to the projected revenue growth of INFN.

    I didn't buy any Silver Springs since they are in the business of using power lines as conduits for broadband which I am concerned may prove to just be a novelty item in the long term. Adtran and Calyx I have a harder time figuring out exactly where they fit into the comm world. However, they both seem like intriguing stock possibilities to me. I bought some Calyx and will study Adtran a bit more and possibly may buy some.

  • Reply to

    Doctors Associates

    by boronmangle Jun 23, 2014 12:26 PM
    bot_feeder bot_feeder Jun 23, 2014 1:06 PM Flag

    The show stopper is that there is no market for sandwiches drenched in seawater.

  • Reply to

    cien vs infn

    by bot_feeder Jun 23, 2014 1:02 PM
    bot_feeder bot_feeder Jun 23, 2014 1:03 PM Flag

    One thing that leads me to prefer INFN is its far better balance sheet. On the other hand, I believe when Micron was about 5 bucks I shied away from it partly based on balance sheet, and since then it went up something like 500%.

  • bot_feeder by bot_feeder Jun 23, 2014 1:02 PM Flag

    Looked at CIEN's chart, wish I had bought some at 18. At 22 I am not inclined. These are clearly the two promising plays in optical transport and I feel like I shouldn't have all my bets on one horse. It would be handy if INFN and CIEN merged, then the investment decision would be easy. I imagine that would run into antitrust obstacles, however.

    I am not an expert in this field but I get the impression that INFN has the superior technology at the optical transport level but that CIEN is big in packet switching so that they appear to have a more comprehensive offering system wise.

  • bot_feeder by bot_feeder Jun 19, 2014 9:18 AM Flag

    Nice to see precious metals holding up during the traditionally weak part of the year.

  • Reply to

    My Profits on INFN

    by verieekatzofj Jun 6, 2014 1:50 PM
    bot_feeder bot_feeder Jun 19, 2014 9:14 AM Flag

    In other words, that would make for a great buying opportunity.

  • Reply to

    My Profits on INFN

    by verieekatzofj Jun 6, 2014 1:50 PM
    bot_feeder bot_feeder Jun 19, 2014 9:13 AM Flag

    Market could go down and stock could hit dirt. I don't think that would dampen business much, business that relies on shuffling data around must continually migrate to bigger pipes or die.

192.30+0.30(+0.16%)Aug 29 4:02 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.