we were defrauded
that why it trades at an 11 pe and a .61 peg
The Sherman Act is divided into three sections. Section 1 delineates and prohibits specific means of anticompetitive conduct, while Section 2 deals with end results that are anticompetitive in nature. Thus, these sections supplement each other in an effort to prevent businesses from violating the spirit of the Act, while technically remaining within the letter of the law. Section 3 simply extends the provisions of Section 1 to U.S. territories and the District of Columbia.
"Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal."
"Every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, shall be deemed guilty of a felony [. . . ]"
its called price fixing, sherman act
sherman act, price fixing
it sounds like price fixing to me under the sherman act
no the naked short shares dont show up when they fail to deliver
clearly the drop was unwarranted, manipulative and fraudulent,
all those naked short sales fail to deliver this week
– After just three hours of deliberation, a federal jury decided yesterday that Apple didn't compete unfairly when it sold music players and songs with copy-protection software that was incompatible with rival devices and music from competing online stores. The jury handed Apple a victory by rejecting a claim from attorneys for consumers and iPod resellers, who were seeking as much as $1 billion in a class-action lawsuit, arguing that Apple was able to overcharge consumers for iPods by making it difficult to switch to a rival music player.
fire the cfo
mm is a criminal
DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH, MORE THE NEXT DAY