I see a lot of red lights in this article. Too many assumptions, no names of people, no real facts unless old ones. He repeated old conclusions and he claims to have spoken certain people who remain anonymous. File a complaint with the SEC! I can understand that people sold, but I cannot accept the anonymous character of someone that has such a tremendous impact on a stock I own. What are his motives? To short! This could be someone from Russia or Afghanistan. Anonymous = anonymous! Wouyld CNBC accept an anonymous person? He wants to have an impact, but he also wants to remain anonymous! Come on! I have seen too much in the stockmarket to leave it like this! FILE A COMPLAINT WITH THE SEC!!!!
Many interesting reads! If someone would have been credible, he would he written his name and would have told WHO he has spoken to. 100% Too fishy here!
Look for SEC and COMPLAINT on Google! I cannot provide the link!
And they were deadly wrong, but at least the short bashers of HLF told everyone who they were. This skunk remains anonymous and is citing other anonymous authors. This is something for the SEC folks!
Wow...ANONYMOUS....Sounds really 'credible'... (NOT)
And will turn around. It will plunge then and you'd wish you sold before that moment. Too much speculation is going on and too much betting.