Sat, Jul 26, 2014, 2:47 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Recent

% | $
Click the to save as a favorite.

Celsion Corp. Message Board

bty79403 30 posts  |  Last Activity: Jun 26, 2014 6:34 AM Member since: Oct 23, 2009
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • bty79403 by bty79403 Jun 26, 2014 6:34 AM Flag

    They're at it again. Let just hope that dumb takes dumber with him when he goes... Great products, but such poor, poor management, I can't describe how awful they are...

  • Reply to

    S-TECHNOLOGY CURVE

    by bluechiptool Jun 13, 2014 9:57 AM
    bty79403 bty79403 Jun 13, 2014 2:40 PM Flag

    There's over 400 hospitals in the UK alone, 1 per 125k people. The ablation market in Europe is several billion dollar, but that certainly doesn't mean that BSDM will get a large proportion of that. I pretty much switch off when he starts talking in billions! There is however a very good market opportunity, especially when you consider the minuscule enterprise value here.

    Cheers,
    Mick

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    S-TECHNOLOGY CURVE

    by bluechiptool Jun 13, 2014 9:57 AM
    bty79403 bty79403 Jun 13, 2014 2:02 PM Flag

    You can critisise Butch all you like, I probably have less respect for him than you. One thing he does have a perfect record in, is buying and selling BSDM stock.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    S-TECHNOLOGY CURVE

    by bluechiptool Jun 13, 2014 9:57 AM
    bty79403 bty79403 Jun 13, 2014 11:22 AM Flag

    I can kind of understand when people didn't believe them, when they said that they expect to have a profitable quarter in fiscal 2014, (Q4 started about 2 weeks ago, and Q3 will report mid July). However, continuing to refuse to believe it, after they bought shares, is a recipe for crow pie.

    Whilst they can't buy on inside information, they're hardly likely to buy shares, and then miss on their publicly stated expectations!

    Cheers,
    Mick

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    This study.

    by bty79403 Jun 11, 2014 3:01 PM
    bty79403 bty79403 Jun 11, 2014 4:06 PM Flag

    Thanks for the down vote doc! nice to know you still care. Hope I haven't scared you? I wouldn't want you reporting me to Yahoo like you did to brj... I'm still shocked that you were scared of him, felt the need to clone him... So sad.

    Looks like I'm good for 20 in a row in our game, (every day it closes above a dollar you lose!!!). Go on, try one more time, they say third time is the charm, I'm waiting there. Tick tock, tick tock, it's Q4 now, profitability RIGHT NOW, tread carefully, you never know what's under foot....

    Much love,
    Mick

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • bty79403 by bty79403 Jun 11, 2014 3:01 PM Flag

    Let clear up a few things, this won't take 5 years, (neither will it take a month!), it will take 6 to 9 months to complete, and another 6 to 9 months to get published in a peer reviewed journal.

    This is a bridging study, and anyone who read my previous post would understand what's going on here. This system is approved, and proven in a clinical setting to ablate tumours that are out of the range of RFA by size. These are rare. There is a lot of pre-clinical work that suggests that SA-MA, doesn't suffer from the same problems as RFA when faced with heat sinks, (usually caused by vasculature). There is also a large weight of hearsay evidence to supplement these pre-clinical studies. You need to look at this from the point of view of the IR's and IO's. They either already have one of these machines that they use infrequently, or they would like one and can't justify having one on projected usage. It's perfectly valid that they would ask for a bridging study to validate in a clinical setting, the large pre-clinical and hearsay evidence. Don't get me wrong, IR's and IO's can use these where ever they like, (and some do), but it's valid to ask for this study.

    Taking the re-ablation market is huge, and there is no shortage of push back against this little company when trying to take that market, this study can mitigate that. Around one in two of every liver cancer patient that has RFA, would need future ablations. Physicians don't like telling patients that they are going to do the exact same procedure on them that has just failed! They want to use this product, some just need a little justification.

    Cheers,
    Mick

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • bty79403 bty79403 May 20, 2014 4:36 AM Flag

    I really ought to proof read. Also, I've included progressions as well as incomplete ablations in the figures above.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • bty79403 bty79403 May 20, 2014 4:28 AM Flag

    Hi Cans,
    Just a quick note, as I've been very busy, (and that's set to continue), so haven't time to put the post togther that I wanted to, but here's a quick somethig worth considering.
    It's quite rare to have solid tumours that are so large that they out of range of RFA, yet are still candidates for ablation. Whilst it's worth having a MA ablation capability for these cases, it's a case of dust them down when needed. However, re-treatments are a diffenent story. Treatment failures happen between 50-80% of cases, more than half of which are suitable for re-treatment, so that is a lot of treatments, it's the difference between a few a year, and a few a week, and well you know the numbers!

    Cheers,
    Mick

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    bty

    by iamoneofbrjjassociatesmebroke May 13, 2014 3:21 PM
    bty79403 bty79403 May 13, 2014 5:41 PM Flag

    Wow, you hit the meth early. Sleep in, let your head clear, kick out the John, and re-read this thread! Are you embarrassed? I thought so. Now calm down, have a cup of tea, you have a heavy day of stock bashing ahead of you, and you haven't even been on the course yet!

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    bty

    by iamoneofbrjjassociatesmebroke May 13, 2014 3:21 PM
    bty79403 bty79403 May 13, 2014 4:36 PM Flag

    ????? What?

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    bty

    by iamoneofbrjjassociatesmebroke May 13, 2014 3:21 PM
    bty79403 bty79403 May 13, 2014 3:59 PM Flag

    My goodness, they fly post to some trailer parks don't they? I'd rekon that most longs remember me backing out of here, (I won't repost it as it might serve your purpose), hence why I'll put a post together this W/E. I'm not sure that replies from me count, so check with your handler before you feed the kids!

    Cheers,
    Mick

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    bty

    by iamoneofbrjjassociatesmebroke May 13, 2014 3:21 PM
    bty79403 bty79403 May 13, 2014 3:29 PM Flag

    So you can't find the post where I got out in the 1.30's, nor the previous buy at 1.15. I'm possibly slightly better known than you think. (Why do you think that some people aren't allowed to talk to me!)

    Cheers,
    Mick

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    C'mon doc.

    by bty79403 May 13, 2014 3:14 PM
    bty79403 bty79403 May 13, 2014 3:25 PM Flag

    Doc, is your chimp pointing out that I told everyone about the delisting notice! I thought you were taking credit for that?

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • bty79403 by bty79403 May 13, 2014 3:14 PM Flag

    My average is still slightly above a dollar. Can't you get your multiple alias chimps to work a little harder? You also might want to get them to stop referencing my posts! I haven't had a miss in nearly 2 years, and my entry / exit points are, well you know!

    I hope to get a chance to post WHY I'm back in in the next few days.

    Cheers,
    Mick

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    bty

    by theclownthatisfullofshhitcanstic May 13, 2014 1:37 PM
    bty79403 bty79403 May 13, 2014 1:47 PM Flag

    So you bring up the last argument you lost with me. Cool, saves me the effort!

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    Ok, now I'm buying back in.

    by bty79403 May 13, 2014 12:59 PM
    bty79403 bty79403 May 13, 2014 1:38 PM Flag

    Ha ha. If you check the symbol that was posted against and the date, you'll see it was perfection! CHTP at £4.39! Lol, quality bashing.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    Ok, now I'm buying back in.

    by bty79403 May 13, 2014 12:59 PM
    bty79403 bty79403 May 13, 2014 1:32 PM Flag

    Yay! Investment advice, for free. You're a star.

    Cheers,
    Mick

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Hope you all had fun whilst I was gone?

    Cheers,
    Mick

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • bty79403 by bty79403 May 8, 2014 11:15 AM Flag

    Hope you enjoyed the ride.

    Cheers,
    Mick

  • bty79403 bty79403 May 1, 2014 2:35 PM Flag

    Yay, Thumper's back!

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

CLSN
3.39-0.01(-0.29%)Jul 25 4:00 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.