It is good to know that you find bachuss_100 to be "far preferable to Ruffnuts & his chubby hubby Fatso as company."
So just enjoy the company!
Is this prediction guaranteed to be as accurate as your prior predictions?
baalhadad • Oct 14, 2012 7:53 PM Flag
Whether Obama wins or loses, Alan will lose, since Romney is likely to win more than 257 electoral votes. Given current polling, the low would be 261.
Think Romney might go as low as 206?
I recall many on this board saying Nevada was a "gimme" for Romney in the last election. He ended-up losing by 5 percentage points.
A lot can happen between now and November. Just go and take a look at the messages posted on this very board 3-4 WEEKS before the last Presidential election.
"with control by u.n. Obama can order our internet closed anytime!!!!!!!!"
I cannot even begin to describe the complete ignorance show by the above comment.
It was said in another thread that ""Ignorance is the mark of a Democrat."
I think anyone reading this thread will certainly attribute that particular trait to Republicans!
Qaydan still ignores the question as to what will be next in his domino theory of internet control takeover!
The Republican party core is beginning to see how the Teabaggers have been causing many of their losses and have begun to ignore them. This is a trend which will continue undoubtedly.
Many Republicans are actually quite smart and they are relaizing they must abandon to radical righwingers, just as the Democratic party abandoned the radical left-wingers in the mid-1970's.
It the natural dynamic of a two-party system. As the Republicans move towards the center, they will win more elections.
I don't bad-mouth Christianity; however, I do bad-mouth false Christians. Which, by they way, is something Jesus also did.
Mark 10:21-22 Jesus, looking at him, loved him and said, "You lack one thing; go, sell what you own, and give the money to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; then come, follow me." When he heard this, he was shocked and went away grieving, for he had many possessions.
So obama_moron is saying that Eisenhower played an average of five round of golf on each separate occasion?
Does he really think anyone is going to believe such a lie?
He most certainly does have a healthcare plan. You may fairly argue whether or not it is good or bad, but it is a plan. The Republicans have no plan.
Better to have them wasting their time here than doing anything that would actually make a difference.
I suspect message boards are a plot of the liberals to keep the conservatives busy wasting their time.
The porous border has existed for so many years for one reason -- the influence of big businesses, which needed illegal immigrants to work in the meat packing plants, produce fields, and do other jobs for peanuts. Money from companies like Iowa Beef Packers and others found it's way into politicians' pockets and the border remained porous for decades.
In 1986 I voted for the Simpson-Mazzoli immigration bill because we were told it would solve the problem of massive illegal immigration. In his diaries, President Ronald Reagan said he was going to sign the bill because we had to regain control of our borders. The Simpson-Mazzoli bill contained three promises:
The government would make a concerted effort to control the borders.
An effective employer verification program would ensure that only legal workers were hired.
One-time amnesty would be granted for people illegally in the United States.
All three promises were broken. The government has made no serious effort to control our borders. Employers continue knowingly to hire illegal immigrants without any real fear of punishment.
Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p.126 , Dec 18, 2007
But she'll never win.... unless the Republicans screw-up again. I find hard to believe the Republicans will screw-up three times in a row on their Presidential nominee. It all depends on whether or not they cater to the Tea Party minority and nominate another unelectable candidate due to some litmus tests.
"they have spent their entire lives being sheltered by America's power in the world."
You mean like Daniel Inouye, Max Cleland, Wes Clark, and Chuck Rangel?
The right to impose an internet tax is not being "given" to anyone. What is being proposed has been the plan since 1998 and will have ZERO impact on any ability to impose an internet tax.
Why don't you read the facts for once in your life and quite wallowing publicly in ignorance?