My response was for that fool. Not you. pardon me.
How the heck something can be named "affordable" while doubling my costs makes no sense to me. I suppose if I were a liberal it would...
100 % NOT $100. Went up over $300/month since Obamacare kicked in- Will ONLY get MORE expensive!
fool. My healthcare premiums - I buy my own - because of Obamacare, has gone up more than $100 in the last year. You obviously do NOT buy your own healthcare.
good guess - and more than likely fairly accurate, as it mimics some of MOs sentiments.
Mulford - some of these guys at this stage in their careers, with their many professional successes and financial stability in place take on ventures like this as a "hobby" or "something to do" another "title" and to help out a buddy - who knows why he is jumping on a "sinking ship". In his case it does not really matter, and I don't really care. I do care about my hundreds of thousands of shares being worthless though.
BACKGROUND: Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer can be missed during white light endoscopy in up to 50% of cases. We aimed to test whether or not we could find a difference between benign and cancerous tissue wavelengths using laser induced autofluorescence spectroscopy can increase cancer detection.
MATERIALS & METHODS: We analysed 67 tissue samples using spectral analysis. The WavSTAT (Spectra Science) optical biopsy device was used to record fluorescence spectra from biopsied tissue enabling calculation of an AUC for each spectrum, a measure of the mean spectral wavelength (λ¯ (nm)) and a dimensionless fluorescence ratio. Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the two groups.
RESULTS: We found that 49.3% (33/67) of the tissue was benign, 44.8% (30/67) was CIS/cancerous tissue, and the remaining 4/67 samples were atypia (2) and dysplasia (2). The median AUC for the benign tissue was 19.53 (Interquartile range [IQR]: 5.35-30.39) and that for CIS/cancerous tissue was 7.05 (IQR: 2.89-14.24) (P=0.002). The median wavelengths for the benign tissue and malignant tissue were 502.4nm (IQR: 500.3nm-504.3nm) and 505.2nm (IQR: 502.1nm-513.2nm), respectively (P=0.003). The median fluorescence ratio was 0.080 (IQR: 0.070-0.088) for benign tissue and 0.096 (IQR: 0.079-0.221) for CIS/Cancerous tissue (P=0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: We found statistical differences between the median AUC calculations and median wavelengths for the benign and cancerous tissue. We also found a statistical difference between the fluorescence ratios between the two tissue types. There seems to be a role for optical spectroscopy in verifying bladder lesions.
When I spoke with MO a couple weeks back - after the large volume day - he indicated the lights are on.
Now, I have learned he says what he needs to say at the time. Why has the share price gone down - only - since I last spoke with him.
another "compassionate" response from a liberal. classic.
Don't agree with a liberal and their drivel ? - they attack you and lash out.
Logic has NO place in their world. None.
not defending or - not defending anyone here. However, we are up 7+% as other gold ETFs are up maybe just over 1%. I will take this over that any day of the week....
I was told the same thing the other day - straight from the horses mouth.
He had no idea where the volume came from. Morris is on the back burner until they can get more money. And they are STILL looking for investors.
Same story each time I speak to MO. I give him credit for calling back. But all the conversations over the past FEW YEARS have been exactly the same.
Can't get investors...
Don't have any money...
Yet they have a product that is fantastic, in my opinion.
Something is not adding up at all.
I think it could be MOs reputation in the industry is less than sub-par.
With or without money this product should be easy to get interest in - if you are the right guy with the right relationships professionally.
Too much time has passed. I am holding as at this point there is no reason to sell. But there is no good news and no money coming our way any time soon.
Good luck to all and feel free - whoever you are - to give me your thumbs down. I have the gumption to speak with MO at least. Maybe you do too, which should eiiminate your thumbs down, as you have the same disheartening if. I have...
sold about 35% of my position today at 4.22 from a 1.47 purchase price. Will hold balance to see what shakes out in the months ahead.
Good luck to all. Very fluid right now. Woulda' shoulda' sold at 5.05 yesterday, but had a good short term gain - which is not always the case.
Every time The Street - Cramer - does a hit piece on a stock it always seems to go up.
Not sure in the case of ANV, if this will happen. But because Gold is gaining and Cramer took out a hit, I am in...
unclear as to the "thumbs down" on my factual posts.
I, like ALL on this board want this thing over .80. Over 1.80 and yes even over 2.88 per share.
The bloviating from MO, to me personally and to those that bothered to listen to him over the years, has gotten them to where I am, in some cases: hundreds of thousands of shares. Owning many companies with this many shares would be worth millions at this point. In this company, however, hundreds of thousands of shares are worth a few grand. Now, I understand buyer beware. I also understand putting faith in what the company tells you - which I did. MO even suggested to average down in one of our phone calls. I am kicking myself for not recording it.
Oh well. Thumbs down to posts from shareholders that share the same frustration, no doubt ?
I embrace them and hope one day my shares are worth millions....