It's all relative. If china's,7% GDP shrinks to say, 5%( + -) in the next yr. people (like yourself?) will say,heck China has a 5% GDP the US would be in boom times w/ that growth rate. However, contraction is contraction & that would be approx. a 25% haircut. Definitely a recession. China yr. over yr. has been resilient yet 2 yrs. ago they were at 8%+ Their gov't is communist yet most of their global customers are not. Watch!
Well alright, technically they won't call it a recession however if it looks like a duck,et al, it's a duck. They sell fewer & fewer goods & people get laid off- parents can't afford to spoil their kids in a western way, & so DANG has to bite the bullet & retrench. 1 -2 yrs from now along comes a new bouncing baby & so the upcycle starts. But in the interim OUCH! LOOK AT HOW FAST & HIGH dang HAS CLIMBED. It's a lot faster down(Although nearterm it will be a slow bleed on steady profit-taking after the tremendous runup ) Now when they release a disappointment at the next ER, that's the tank! My opinion!
Yet China is most likely heading into a recession in the next 3-6 mos. I doubt their rule by few will be willing to continue cleaning up their air when busn. slows down. In the US the movement at present is to do away w/ the burning of coal. Most ouch for FTEK if that happens. It does make sense. We have enough NG(factor in Canada) & we are set for the next 75 yrs. By then we will be using mostly what we call alternatives today. FTEK for the near to midterm is a hold I would buy & hold if it would drop back into the low $4's-high $3's & wait for China to emerge from their coming recession. Mostly my opinion!
you're going to love it at $10. China is entering, albeit slowly, into a bonafide recession. Next E.R. for dang will disappoint. Just my opinion! Personally, I will wait for the low $7's to enter & wait out China's recession. LOL
There is another Co. that is producing glass for lenses,etc. It's supposed to be stronger,etc. Anyone have a name? Thanks!
Is there method closely aligned w/ dendritic cell therapy? Because no one trusts it anymore Imuc tried and failed & their method used 6 antigens as opposed to dendrion's 1 antigen. Could someone explain how stml's method varies enough to matter in the final analysis APPROVAL! My opinion1
I'm new to ptla could you give the approx. date of phase 3 completion? I believe in Co. and am in yet didn't do enough DD. Thanks!
Out of curiosity where does Adam F. indicate this is the biggest scam of all time?
How did they align w/ Johns Hopkins, & other prestigious medical institutions? No when we get the truth my speculation is that non-information, incomplete information is being presented for the phase 2 results. Suddenly, pieces of the puzzle will be released, more than likely having a positive outlook on the trial, that will cause the stk. to recover the substantial losses & more. Of course by then most of the original investors will have sold their positions. I sense that some investors(big positions?) were chased out for whatever reason(s) I also sense that a shareholder's class action lawsuit is inevitable. Just an uninformed opinion.
At this point if management clarifies that many of the immunized are still alive I believe a class action is in order for w/holding info. pertinent to an informed investor decision. Let's face it if 20%(even 10%) of the enrollees who were immunized survive we have solid winner here. Something smells rotten in Denmark-the silence is not golden. Even though I'm out of this position I want the truth.
For example, if 100 people are given the flu vaccine there is a %(relatively high) of these people that, throughout the flu season, will come down w/ the flu that they were immunized against. There are other factors at work in an immunization process. Could this be a consideration in other immunization processes. (ICT-107?)Something to consider. Ask the present 7 survivors of GBM that took ICT-107 in phase 1 if they think it works! Unless there were people in the phase 1 that were misdiagnosed(intentionally?) w/ glioblastoma to fudge the phase 1 results I still hold out for a successful future of IMUC. Has anyone been notified about a class action to perhaps get to the bottom of what the truth is? My opinion!
that's what I want to know. Was enrollment staggered or was everyone given the vaccine at approx. the same time(say w/in a wk.) Why I ask is that there could be a mechanism in some people like the long term survivors, from phase 1,that accept & hold the immunization while others don't "hold" the process. If all the immunized have become events(passed away) THEN TRULY THESE STATS. ARE NOT TOO GOOD. Were these 7 survivors from the phase 1 ALL flukes(highly unlikely) or does ICT-107 work w/in some people that have a slightly different,say, biological brain makeup. I don't understand yet believe not all is lost. Unless ALL the patients of the phase 2 are dead as we speak. My opinion!
I just wonder how they will design it. They will have to jettison the Co. that formulated this last vaccine & have an independent backup Co. to verify the vaccine potency in the phase 3. Since there were no adverse health concerns the FDA should let them move on to a phase 3. Something deep down tells me this vaccine is much more effective than these phase 2 results seem to be showing! How many people that were in this trial are still alive? In my opinion, how long they stay alive is the final quantifier to ICT-107's overall effectiveness. All the patients enrolled aren't dead are they? My opinion!
Good to hear from you Discoduck. Us old timers to IMUC smell something is rotten in Denmark. I sold -taking a wicked beating. Don't know if I should've hung in there. This morning I'm asking myself why management isn't doing anything in the damage control area. I may upon what they have to say, re-enter below $1. What's your opinion. I personally can't believe the stats. could be that bad. I too think there could be hanky panky w/ the vaccine process. How do you think they will change how they approach phase 3? Not much under the tree for us this Christmas.