Any type of undercooked food can be contaminated with E Coli. That's not even relevant to what we are discussing. Typical misdirection on your part.
Pretty important story, ability to partner programs, I thought this was a fairly important part "In addition to our ophthalmic uses, this platform now gives Ocata the ability to carve out the non-ophthalmic uses and to potentially partner this Restorative ImmunologyTM platform for the treatment of devastating autoimmune diseases, such as Lupus and Crohn’s Disease.” cause there are a lot of potential programs Ocata could partner.
Ignoresthefacts says organic food kills people, but common sense tells us that people and animals have been eating chemical free "organic" food for millions of years, it's certainly not killing anybody. A lot of folks including the executives at Monsanto and at present a majority of shareholders don't want to change the status quo because they can't envision a company being profitable producing healthy and sustainable products. Things will change despite the dinosaurs in the industry.
Truth, like milk, arrives in the dark
But even so, wise dogs don't bark.
Only mongrels make it hard
For the milkman to come up the yard.
~Christopher Morley, Dogs Don't Bark at the Milkman
Get educated yourself, cracker, or learn how to read. Neither one of my comments says Walmart manufactures anything, and my second comment specifically says " Walmart would be a better place to shop if the put more thought into the design of what they bought". You sound stupid making comments about other people getting educated and you don't even know how to read.
My message was above your verbal comprehension threshold. I didn't say I went to Walmart to get top quality and I didn't say the price I expected to pay. The point I made, which was a valid one and I will re-emphasize here since you didn't get it the first time, is that Walmart would be a better place to shop if the put more thought into the design of what they bought, and as the benefit of mass production marketing is that you should get a better product at a lower price.
2 experiences I had at Walmart. I bought a pair of Corey running shoes there. A depression developed right under the ball of the foot that caused my sock to bunch up and become very uncomfortable. So I finally cut open the shoe to see why it was so uncomfortable, not being able to wear it anymore. In the top of the sole material right below where the ball of the foot goes there was a manufactured sideways cut taken out of the material. The lining of the shoe was not sufficient to support my foot without having material beneath so that is where the depression developed and that ruined the entire shoe. The same thing is happening with a pair of Brahma boots I bought there so I'm just waiting for warmer weather to take them apart, but I suspect its the same problem. In my mind, the idea of mass production is to make a better product at a lower price. A third pair of high top insulated boots I bought at the same time had so much stiff insulation stuffed in an unyielding ridge around the top of the boot, it chafed my legs badly and I had to cut the tops of the boots off to wear them. Fortunately I bought the boots at a low enough price so next time I can get a better pair of boots somewhere else. But this looks like planned obsolescence. In other words the product is sold relatively inexpensively to induce you to buy it and to throw it away and not take it back if there is a problem and the manufacturer knows you will get limited use out of the product so eventually you will have to buy another pair. There is a problem with the design of the shoes and somewhere in the Walmart organization there is a problem with whoever is doing the buying, because when you buy product in the massive amounts that Walmart does it should be high quality and inexpensive. In the Walmart of today, it's just cheap, but that's not enough to sell me when the product is unusable.
Don't know if anyone posted this yet, but it might be good news if it happens:
1/27/2015 Benitec considering partnerships for multiple programs,
Story Benitec (OTC:BTEBY, ASX:BLT), the Sydney, Australia-based
company focused on DNA-directed RNAi therapies, has been
attracting partnership interest over the last 12 months, said
CEO Peter French.
“We are having discussions about many of our pipeline
programs with multiple pharma companies,” French said. He
declined to disclose which companies have been involved in
partnership discussions with Benitec. The company is not
interested in a sale and plans to build a pipeline of programs,
The company’s gene silencing technology, ddRNAI, could
provide a “single shot cure” for a variety of diseases and
medical conditions including Hepatitis C, Hepatitis B, drug
resistant lung cancer, wet AMD (Age-related Macular
Degeneration) and the orphan genetic disease OPMD
(oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy), French said.
When asked if Benitec had been working with an investment
bank, French said it had worked with Maxim Investment Bank
in New York last February to raise AUD 30m from healthcare
institutional investors and Maxim had also assisted with
French said the fundraisingn gave the company increased
visibility in the US and Benitec is now considering whether it
wants to have a stronger US presence. The company currently
has a laboratory in San Francisco, but it may also consider
adding a US-based headquarters and moving its US stock
listing from the OTC board to one of the major exchanges, he
said. The company is looking “at a range” of investment banks to assist with the potential exchange move but is willing to hold discussions with additional banks outside of this group, French said. Benitec’s market cap on the ASX is approximately AUD 112m. Benitec’s ddRNAI platform technology introduces a small DNA sequence directly into a cell’s nucleus where it silences unwanted or disease-causing genes which can result in long-lasting, positive therapeutic outcomes. Drugs created from the company’s platform technology have fewer side effects, have a more specific delivery of the therapy, and can have multiple therapies in one molecule, French said. The company’s lead drug candidate, TT-034, is undergoing a Phase I/IIa trial for the treatment of Hepatitis C. This is an “open label dose escalation study” so the company will be reporting results on an ongoing basis, French said. Benitec expects to be reporting data to the FDA in the first half of 2016. TT-034 would be able to eliminate the usual long course of treatment for Hepatitis C, French said, noting that patients often have compliance issues with multiple-dose therapies which can hinder positive outcomes. Benitec now has sufficient funding for the next few years, French said, noting Benitec has a cash balance of approximately AUD 30m. The company has a cash burn of about AUD 9m per year and Australia’s R&D tax incentive program provides the company with “a longer cash runway”, French said. The February 2014 capital raise will enable the company to take TT-034 through the Phase IIb trial, he said. Benitec has in-house programs in the areas of Hepatitis C, Hepatitis B, drug resistant lung cancer, wet AMD and OPMD. It already has licensing agreements with Calimmune for HIV/AIDS, with Regen BioPharma (OTC: RGBP) for cancer vaccines, with uniQure (NASDAQ: QURE) for Huntington’s Disease, with Genable for Retinitis Pigmentosa, and with Circuit for neuropathic pain. The company’s legal advisers are FAL in Australia and DLA
Piper in the US. by Ilene
Dr. Chiplin would probably have sold a greater percentage of his shares if he was concerned about the company's progress. The dollar amount of the shares he sold ($45,500) probably represents normal profit-taking. Everybody has expenses. Dr. Chiplin also has options for another 400,000 shares expiring in 2016 at $1.25. Nice, I see Benitec's share price and volume is up today.
There is a good video on youtube if you search the caption above. Stephen Minger is the head of GE's Life Sciences division. Somewhere in the video (which is all worth watching) he mentions Calimmune and the silencing they are doing to close the cell surface pathways that allow HIV to enter immune cells. It seems he is aware of just about everything that is happening in regenerative medicine. Is it possible Benitec could be a partner with GE in developing ddRNAi? Looks pretty interesting because one of the things he mentioned is that GE is developing automated testing of protein toxicity at various doses and this would be critical in order to develop and test possible side effects throughout the body of the proteins produced or silenced by synthetic DNA. Also according to Dr. Minger could eliminate the need for in vitro and animal testing and tremendously reduce the cost of new drug development.
I am looking at the "Fiscal Summary" page in the "Market Snapshot" done by Shaw Stockbroking for the ASX, found at the ASX site. I see that the Shaw report is projecting a big increase in operating revenues for Benitec from 1.2 million in 2015 to 60.1 million in 2016. I contacted Shaw and Carl Stubbings to shed some light on this projection and I didn't hear back any relevant information from either one of them. You see to know a lot about Benitec so have you seen the market snapshot and do you know what is the cause of that projected increase. I am concerned they are going to do further dilution but if they sell additional shares that would not be operating revenue increase would it? Just wondering why no one seems to have an answer.
I went to the link and just saw that video for he first time so that's a great find. Thanks. They're talking about Ocata, of course, and a lot of potential investors new to the subject should find that video very interesting.
Sentiment: Strong Buy
I see that Colonial Trust Advisors has started a position in Ocata. They have apparently been around for over 100 years and Ocata is joining the company of Microsoft, Coca Cola, PepsiCo, Union Pacific, Walt Disney, and Duke Energy among others. They have about 140 substantial companies in their portfolio according to NASDAQ.
What are you talking about as you drone on? The facts and independent research shows that glyphosate affects health and the genetic modification of plants potentiates horizontal gene transfer both with negative repercussions to health. Why are you babbling on about global warming and speculating on non-confirmable correlations between various beliefs. Jut stick to the facts and maybe you'll begin to realize that human health is more important than quarterly profits.
Search "ISIS.org" and "Deterioration of Public Health"