ray, you and Jtower are the 2 bs'ers on this board.. Franz is another one, but he's already left the building...it is time to stop your bs and move on to other MB, because every one knows you're full of #$%$.
anybody can knock out anything, but not too many people wants to do it because they have conscience. Victims are on the other side of the destruction, greed, false allegations. This kind of underhand tactics should not be tolerated. Decent human being should rise up and stop this kind false, inaccurate and contain numerous errors of facts, misleading speculations and malicious interpretations of events for self-serving.
GE in business for 100+ years, NQ is in business for 2 yrs. GE is in selected business, NQ is in retails and Mobile phones are changing (users get a new phone every 6 to 12 mo now).. GE get one contract and they provide products for many years, NQ get renewal contract with suppliers and vendors every 6 months.
two different business models and the question is irrelevant to the bottom line... case closed, move on
take your bulls$%t somewhere else.
He told Bloomberg that his report took him 2 months, and his team interviewed over 800 people in China and other businesses that have dealt with NQ.. well, NQ should take them to court and let MW proves where and who did the interview, and questions they asked, did they interview in Chinese or English (MW doesn't have Chinese speaking in their staff) what kind of scientific tools to analyze the answer (they didn't interview 20 people a day for 2 months, voter research don't even interview that many people in 2 months). How many companies did he talked with, and what he was talk about to come to a conclusion of fraud inNQ part ?) make them show the airline tickets, hotel bills, expense reports, visa and passport document for all the interviewers that they were there to do their research.
In addition he claimed that they loaded NQ apps and made bank transaction numerous times (Bloomberg cut him off, like to hear the outcome of his analysis on the apps )
Everything about this company is a lie, cheat and steal.. make them pay, hang them up side down..
if his research is non-biased and fair, then he has nothing to worry about.. well, unless he has motive to fabricate his research to benefit himself.. I wouldn't call that a research.. basically he just created a crime scene with shady evidences that he gathered in the internet..
it turns out, the whole stock markets are being manipulated by MMs. AGEN was $3.5 when the news released, and today it only worth $2.80, 25% drop in less than 8hrs of trading. What has changed. nada.... news are faked, and analysts make bogus recommendations to lure individual investors. you can't win when the game is rigged in all the levels.
it has been sitting in same spot for the past 10 days, just like waiting for bad news so stock can take a dive..MMs keep printing the tape w/o trading transaction ? this is not a safe place to be..
why should innocent investors pay for his sometimes wrong. He should be paid for his mistakes.. one way or another.. sooner is better.
SEC, NYSE and FBI should thrown his #$%$ in jail. Confiscate all his assets and return to investors.
lx924, CB claimed that 90%+ revs were faked, but you seemed to suggest that NQ get a lot of revenues from secretly charging people..who is right ? you or your scam master CB? Out of 1.4 Bil. people in China, by reading one user comment on one of the forum, you have concluded that NQ is running scam ?
Using your data analysis techniques, only 25% US household using AAPL products, I must conclude that AAPL is also running scam, because data clearly shows 75% hates AAPL products..
To validate my conclusion, can you tell us how old is your brain ??
CLDX needs to establish baseline products as a revenue generator while exploring other potential cure.. it appears that CLDX is trying to do too much at the same time and all it takes just a one fail, the whole pipeline will collapsed and no revenue to recover..a finite (limited) resources and lack of focus could turn my investments into "all or none" scenario, trying to stay positive but I have to re-evaluate my risk exposure here..
clinically is a good news, did AGEN project the potential revenues for this exp.therapy ? stock price doesn't seem to respond well to the recent good news released by the company...AGEN market caps should be 500Mil by now.. Unfortunately, MMs are keeping $90milin market caps with $35mil in cash and a rich pipeline of cancer cure products.. what can you do when Wall Street cartels not to let stock price holds above $3/shr.
his title should be: Medal of Lie, Cheat and Steal.. He steals money from hard earned US investors for his own gain.
why don't you open your own company,have your own mail server and write code to layout the website as your desire.. if you don't have the ability to do any of the item above, then stop crying..
my bet will be no change in FED policy for now.. if taper is announced, market crash could happen and shopping season could be halted.. upcoming earning reports will not meet expectations and equity markets drop further.. this will destablizing the world economy.. will see if the FED is listening to my free advise.. LOL
lx924, you must have quoted a Chinese expression from the Dumdum Dynasty " 10 bottles with 7 caps", here's another expression for you: 你他妈的愚蠢.
Let me tell you why:
CLDX was traded at $27.50 when the secondary offering announcement, 80 Mil. floated shares. Secondary offer of 7mil shares priced at $24.50.
The market cap loss of $3 X 80 mil shares = (- $240 Mil.)
Cash gain from $24.5 X 7 Mil. shares = + $171.5 Mil.
Investors loss $240 Mil. while CLDX gains $171.5 Mil. in cash. Basically CLDX management says, screw investors..
If CLDX has a such potential pipeline of products, why don't they raise cash through private equity firms by selling 7 Mil shares at 10% discount ($24.5) without interfering with the floated shares ? I am suspected that private equity firms are too smart to invest in bogus claims by CLDX's phase I, II trials results.. it is easier to screw these retail investors and lazy institutional investors who managed public money like 401K, IRA , Pension plans.. you don't have to agree with me, just do the math and you can see the discrepancies of the net gain/loss of this transaction... who is in the right mind would lose $240 Mil in market caps to gain $171.5 Mil in cash ???