Do we still see $83 before July 23rd earnings or buy now for trip to $100? Still fear correction between now and Oct. Thoughts? If one believed FB were going to $100 in the next 12 months, how can you play this with options? And also buy protection from any downside risk?
Art by XXX doesn't care to help anyone but himself. He is the lowest kind of #$%$ that we could find on a posting board. Lies are posted every day making predictions to the downside that never come true. He is here to cause fear to the inexperienced investor. PUT HIM ON IGNORE!
Delaying bad news?
MENLO PARK, Calif., July 1, 2015 /PRNewswire/ -- Facebook, Inc. (FB) today announced that the company's second quarter 2015 financial results will be released after market close on Wednesday, July 29, 2015.
Glad the FDA doesn't listen to rational less posters like you. Half the patients dropped out the study? Liar comes to mind.
The stock doesn't trade rationally on fundamentals. One day just because Meg what's her face on Fast Money raved about the company the stock ran as high as $134.94. A day later $12 lower?!!! It's not the company I have a problem with. This stock moves because traders are flipping it. Not good.
Jonathan Loynes, Chief European Economist at Capital Economics, has just sent out a new research note.
We think it unlikely that Greece’s creditors will agree to its request for a new two-year bailout and an explicit commitment to debt restructuring, even with Mr Tsipras’ new concessions. If nothing else, such a deal would require a whole new memorandum of understanding and approval from the German parliament. And discussions over the precise form and extent of debt restructuring will take considerable time.
Even if they do sign up to such a deal, we have seen how previous bailouts and minor debt restructurings have done nothing to make Greece’s debts more sustainable. That, after all, was supposedly why the Greek government has consistently pledged not to enter new bailouts but to secure instead a major debt write-down. In short, we will continue to watch with interest how events unfold. But for now, we do not share the markets’ apparent optimism that an end to the crisis is near.
Incredibly manipulated. No responses necessary.
Do far you're not going to well today. Market is up PM over $100 points. Dead Cat Bounce? Maybe...
Better watch yourself and your posts. You've been warned. The truth about you is about to come out.
Timewarp-how do you trade this? Seems the path of least resistence is down. You mentioned the key number being old high of $86. Bet you it breaks below that. Maybe not today. Then tomorrow. But problem is the referendum. And Tuesday deadline. My gut tells me we see more downside tomorrow when the Greeks miss their payment. Would you short FB here? Anything above $87 and change? Or would you stay out until we get referendum results? I'm so out of my league here with this stuff. Have a position in the VXX that should serve me well. And small position in VRTX - cystic fibrosis decision this week. Should do well. Hoping for $140 or higher. Thoughts?
Art you are full if b.s. Last time you claimed news was coming out, the time came and went with nothing. Remember the Boy Who Cried Wolf? You better be careful man.
It's incredible. Since Art by XXX has posted, the only times he's even acknowledged he's gotten it wrong is when he would say "I don't have a crystal ball." Well, Art it's obvious you don't! And you have a hard time telling the truth. Where's the $68 you predicted FB would be trading at by the end of June? Even with a Greece crisis, we won't see that! Admit your conspiracy theory is just that. Too many big companies trading earnings on NON-GAAP. You really think a Barrons story is going to bring down a large and powerful group like Google, Facebook, Amazon, Salesforce, etc etc etc?? You're sniffing glue if you think that day is coming. EVERYONE knows the difference between GAAP and NON-GAAP earnings. Only retail investors are just learning. That's why you come off as an amateur when you start spewing this stuff as though it's something new. Barrons are trying to sell newspapers and clicks. But Google it and you'll see this issue has been talked about many times before and with this wall of top companies, there's no way that a little rag like Barrons can change a #$%$ thing. And why? Cause no one is breaking the law that's why!!! You moron! If all these companies were breaking the law, then you'd already would have seen lead stories. You haven't because it's all legal. Certainly not ethical but the law is the law. So run along you poor misinformed sociopath ["a person with a personality disorder manifesting itself in extreme antisocial attitudes and behavior and a lack of conscience."] That's you Art by XXX. Sociopathic chronic liar.
$68 you said by end of june. You have 2 days lake george genius.
Just Google, TWTR but FB is only mentioned in passing but not once does Barron's writer call into account the true earnings value of FB earnings due to differences in GAAP and NON-GAAP earnings. The writer attacks Goohle saying it's PE is really 25 than the more "reasonable" 19 it portends. So if FB were also a bad guy in GAAP vs NON-GAAP earnings, why didn't the Barron's writer go after them too in the story? He does not. Explanation?