% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

SWS Group, Inc. Message Board

catalprod 59 posts  |  Last Activity: May 4, 2015 11:58 AM Member since: Jun 20, 1999
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Reply to

    thers goes another 50 million- 8k just filed

    by smallercap May 1, 2015 5:31 PM
    catalprod catalprod May 4, 2015 11:58 AM Flag

    The Phoenix Companies, Inc. (“Phoenix”) announced that Phoenix Life Insurance Company and PHL Variable Insurance Company, wholly-owned direct and indirect subsidiaries of Phoenix (together, the “Companies”), reached an agreement as of April 30, 2015 with SPRR, LLC, Martin Fleisher, as trustee of the Michael Moss Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust II, and Jonathan Berck, as trustee of the John L. Loeb, Jr. Insurance Trust (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”), to resolve two previously disclosed class actions (the “Class Actions”) against the Companies relating to certain cost of insurance (“COI”) rate adjustments made in 2010 and 2011 with respect to certain policies issued by the Companies. The agreement requires that a formal settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) will be filed with the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and will be subject to certain conditions and court approval.

    The settlement class consists of all policyholders that were subject to the 2010 or 2011 COI rate adjustments (collectively, the “Settlement Class”) and will be structured to allow members of the Settlement Class to opt out of the settlement (the “Settlement”). The Companies will establish a Settlement fund, which may be reduced proportionally for any opt-outs, and will pay a class counsel fee if the Settlement is approved. The Companies will be released by all participating members of the Settlement Class. The Companies agreed to pay a total of $48.5 million, as reduced for any opt-outs, in connection with the Settlement.

  • Reply to

    This is absurd

    by jesseforprez Feb 25, 2015 9:40 AM
    catalprod catalprod Feb 25, 2015 10:59 PM Flag

    You should probably listen to their conference call- outlook was very subdued even in light of record backlog. Q4 earnings were boosted by sale of land and tax gains- operating earnings were abysmal. Reminds me of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers when they were 0-13- someone asked the coach what he thought about the team's execution- the coach answered that he was in favor of it. GLDD execution was pathetic and they were not encouraging people to look for a great deal of margin improvement which is unfathomable.

    Sentiment: Hold

  • Reply to

    8k this morning-double secret probation?

    by catalprod Feb 25, 2015 8:53 AM
    catalprod catalprod Feb 25, 2015 10:51 AM Flag

    I think a sober assessment would be that Doral has been warned again and again and again to "put their affairs in order" because they have terminal stage 10 brain cancer. If they have not found an interested buyer at this point I think they are toast. If they can't deal in brokered CD's do they think any financial institution is going to want to do business with you? Any bank at this point that would extend them any credit or do any other kind of transactions with them would be out of their mind. I just hope the holding company gets to keep the tax attributes that should be quite large- not quite as large as WaMu (WMI Holdings) but sizable nonetheless.

    Sentiment: Hold

  • On February 24, 2015 Doral Bank (the “Bank”), the principal operating subsidiary of Doral Financial Corporation (the “Company”), received a Joint Report of Examination (the “ROE”) from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) and the Puerto Rico Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions for the period ending September 30, 2014 as well as a Notification of Capital Category — Prompt Corrective Action (the “PCA Letter”) from the FDIC pursuant to which the FDIC has notified the Bank that as of the date of the PCA Letter and based upon the adjustments in the ROE it deems the Bank to be “critically undercapitalized” as of September 30, 2014. By virtue of being deemed to be “critically undercapitalized” the Bank is subject to operating restrictions all or many of which have been described in previous Form 8-Ks filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Under these operating restrictions the Bank is prohibited from doing any of the following:
    1. Entering into any material transaction other than in the usual course of business, including any investment, expansion, acquisition, sale of assets, or other similar action with respect to which the depository institution is required to provide notice to the appropriate federal banking agency;
    2. Extending credit for any highly leveraged transaction;
    3. Amending the institution’s charter or by-laws, except to the extent necessary to carry out any other requirement of any law, regulation, or order;
    4. Making any material change in accounting methods;
    5. Engaging in any covered transaction (as defined in section 23A(b) of the Federal Reserve Act, 12 U.S.C. Section 371c(b));
    6. Paying excessive compensation or bonuses;
    7. Paying interest on new or renewed liabilities at a rate that would increase the institution’s weighted average cost of funds to a level significantly exceeding the prevailing rates of interest on insured deposits in the institution’s normal market areas; and
    8. Making any principal or interest payment on subordinated debt beginning 60 days after becoming critically undercapitalized.
    The PCA Letter further directs the Bank to develop policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the restrictions set forth in section 38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and section 324.405 of the FDIC Rules and Regulations, 12 C.F.R. Section 324.405(a)(4) that apply to “critically undercapitalized” institutions. The PCA Letter further instructs the Bank that it may not accept, renew, or roll over brokered deposits; it may not pay a rate of interest on any type of deposit that exceeds the national average for that type of deposit by more than 75 basis points unless it requested and received a high-rate determination from the appropriate FDIC regional office (and in the case of deposits accepted from outside the Bank’s normal market area, the Bank may not pay a rate of interest which exceeds the national rate cap for that type of deposit); the Bank continues to be deemed to be in “troubled condition” and subject to the restrictions applicable thereto; and the Bank continues to be subject to the Supervisory Prompt Corrective Action Directive issued on January 26, 2015 (the “PCA Directive”) and notwithstanding the Bank’s February 10, 2015 administrative appeal the Bank remains subject to the PCA Directive.

    Sentiment: Hold

  • Reply to

    Attiva is back

    by uhohhhh10 Feb 20, 2015 4:34 PM
    catalprod catalprod Feb 20, 2015 5:35 PM Flag

    8k filing-Update on Future Operations

    In order to comply with regulatory requirements to de-risk the Bank while maintaining minimum capital and sufficient liquidity (including planning for the maturity of brokered deposits, which the Company is prohibited from replacing with additional brokered deposits), the Bank has sold performing and non-performing assets (principally mortgage loans and real estate owned properties) and certain businesses. The reduction in total assets will reduce both the Company’s revenues and expenses (after giving effect to reductions in force to re-size the Bank to reflect its reduced operating size).

    The Company is unable to determine the extent of any recovery for its debt holders and creditors as well the preferred or common holders under either the Updated Capital Plan (which has not been accepted by the FDIC) or a receivership of the Bank by the FDIC as the amount of any recovery will depend upon the priority of the claim, the price at which assets and businesses can be sold and the extent of liability certain parties such as the Commonwealth might have to the Company and the Bank for breaching its payment obligations under the 2012 Closing Agreement and whether the Company will be able to collect monies from the Commonwealth even if its right to recover against the Commonwealth is affirmed on appeal.

    Sentiment: Hold

  • Reply to

    3 Banks That May Not Survive 2015

    by red_tsar Feb 19, 2015 12:26 PM
    catalprod catalprod Feb 19, 2015 12:58 PM Flag

    where did this article appear? thanks

    Sentiment: Hold

  • Time Is Running Out for Doral Financial
    PCAs are often considered one of the last public warnings before a bank goes into receivership, which Doral acknowledged was a possibility in a recent regulatory filing, and industry experts warned that the company is quickly running out of options.
    "I think the likelihood that Doral could raise sufficient capital is as close to zero as you can possibly get," said Bert Ely at consulting firm Ely & Co. "I don't think Doral will be able to continue as an independent organization."

    Sentiment: Hold

  • the wholesale puking of DRL pfd this week has all the earmarks of a forced margin liquidation. One would have to be a very brazen insider trader to have disgorged this much stock in the face of no announced news. I am still betting on a Ch 11 filing with some attempt to forestall an FDIC takeover while the PR tax issue is decided. Could break new ground in terms of judicial brinksmanship- turf war between regulators and bankruptcy and other courts.

  • common trading at $2.75 per share while $25 liq preference pfds are trading at 50 cents a share in volume- even if Doral is seized these preferreds look like a much better speculation than the common. My bet is a ch 11 filing simultaneous with FDIC takeover by Friday which is when the FDIC likes to do its dirty work

    Sentiment: Hold

  • Reply to

    FDIC FHLB noose tightening 8k today

    by catalprod Jan 28, 2015 10:17 AM
    catalprod catalprod Jan 28, 2015 11:16 AM Flag

    last I saw there were over $1 billion in FHLB advances to Doral

  • The FHLB also notified the Bank that as a safe and sound practice and in order to comply with the FHLB’s regulatory guidelines, the FHLB could not extend credit to a capital-deficient member that has positive tangible capital if it receives written notice from the appropriate federal banking agency (in the case of the Bank, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”)) that the member’s use of the FHLB’s advances is prohibited. To the Company’s knowledge the FDIC has not provided any such notice to the FHLB. The FHLB periodically checks the Bank’s status with the FDIC with its next scheduled check to occur on or about February 22, 2015. After February 22, 2015, the Company understands that the FHLB anticipates that it will thereafter seek guidance from the FDIC for each overnight advance requested by the Bank before making such advance. The Bank is currently assessing the materiality and magnitude of the impact of these changes in its liquidity forecasts.
    Prompt Corrective Action Directive
    On January 26, 2015, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Bank received a letter dated January 26, 2015 from the FDIC notifying the Board that on January 26, 2015 the FDIC, acting under its discretionary authority, had issued against the Bank a Prompt Corrective Action Directive (the “Directive”). The Directive became effective immediately upon its receipt by the Bank.
    The Directive directs the Bank to promptly (i) increase the amount of its Tier 1 capital to a level sufficient to restore the Bank to the capital category of “adequately capitalized” under Section 38(b)(1)(B) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act; and/or (ii) accept an offer to combine with another insured depositary institution.

    Sentiment: Strong Sell

  • The new type of debt would build upon the $10 billion private-activity bond market by including funding for airports, ports, mass transit, water and sewer initiatives.

    Obama Proposes New Muni Bonds for Public-Private Infrastructure

    By Brian Chappatta - Jan 16, 2015

    President Barack Obama is proposing a new class of municipal bonds to spur public-private partnerships in U.S. infrastructure projects.

    The program, called Qualified Public Infrastructure Bonds, wouldn’t expire, and there’d be no cap on issuance, the administration said in a statement Friday. The debt also wouldn’t be subject to the Alternative Minimum Tax, which limits the tax benefits and exemptions that high-earning individuals can claim to reduce their levies.

    “QPIBs will extend the benefits of municipal bonds to public private partnerships, like partnerships that involve long-term leasing and management contracts, lowering the cost of borrowing and attracting new capital,” the administration said in the statement. The bonds will serve “as a permanent lower cost financing tool to increase private participation in building our nation’s public infrastructure.”
    The proposal for a new type of security in the $3.6 trillion municipal market is part of a broader White House plan calling for more investment in roads, bridges and other infrastructure in advance of the administration’s budget proposal that will be released Feb. 2.

    The market contracted in 2014 for an unprecedented fourth straight year as local officials refrained from borrowing even as tax-exempt interest rates were close to generational lows. The last time the market expanded was in 2010, the final year of the federal Build America Bonds program. That program provided municipalities a subsidy on interest costs for issuing taxable debt to finance infrastructure work.
    Building Block

    The new type of debt would build upon the $10 billion private-activity bond market by including funding for airports, ports, mass transit, water and sewer initiatives. The bonds couldn’t be used to privatize public systems or finance privately owned facilities.
    America’s federal, state and local governments need to spend $3.6 trillion through 2020 to put the nation’s critical systems in adequate shape, according to a 2013 report from the American Society of Civil Engineers. Without higher spending, the group projects the costs of travel delays, power and water outages will reach $1.8 trillion by 2020.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Philadelphia District, has just awarded a $128.17 million contract to Great Lakes Dredge and Dock, Co., LLC, Oak Brook, Illinois for the Long Beach Island shore protection project.

    GLDD won the contract, with options, for beachfill and completion of initial construction, from Barnegat Inlet to Little Egg Inlet, Long Beach Island, New Jersey, with an estimated completion date of August 11, 2017, according to the

    Long Beach Island is an 18-mile barrier island in southern Ocean County, New Jersey. This area regularly suffers damages from coastal storms, hurricanes and northeasters. The shore protection project is designed to reduce erosion and property damages associated with these events.

    A Feasibility Report Completed in September of 1999 recommended a 22 foot high dune with a 125 foot long berm at an elevation of 8 feet above the water line to protect the island from wave and storm damage.

    Approximately 11,000,000 cubic yards of sand was planed for the initial construction. A periodic nourishment cycle will contribute an additional 2,000,000 cubic yards every 7 years.

    Dredging Today Staff

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • SEC website posting-
    Statement on Court’s Final Judgment in Case Against Life Partners Holdings, Brian Pardo, and R. Scott Peden
    Andrew Ceresney
    Director, Division of Enforcement
    Dec. 2, 2014

    We are pleased that the court today ordered Life Partners, Pardo, and Peden to pay over $46.8 million. In ordering this significant monetary relief, the Court recognized the egregious nature of their misconduct, noting that the Defendants engaged in ‘serious violations’ of the securities laws, that they ‘deprived the investing public of the information it needed to make a fully informed decision about whether to invest in Life Partners.’

    Sentiment: Strong Sell

  • A consortium consisting of Van Oord, Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V., NMDC (Abu Dhabi) and Jan de Nul (Belgium) has acquired a contract from the Suez Canal Authorities in connection with the expansion of the Suez Canal, which provides a vital shipping link between Europe and Asia. The total contract value amounts to USD 1.5 billion, with each partner entitled to an equal share of USD 375 million.

    While the consortium Dredging International NV (75%) – Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company, LLC (25%) has been awarded the assignment to deepen and widen the western branch of the Suez Canal at Great Bitter Lake, Deversoir Reach and Kabreet Reach (lot number 6), worth 540 million USD.

    Van Oord, Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V., NMDC and Jan de Nul contract includes the construction of the parallel section of the canal with a length of approximately 50 kilometers to allow ships to simultaneously transit in two directions as well as the widening and deepening of a number of existing sections to a depth of 24 meters. The majority of the dredging activities for the canal expansion will be executed with 17 cutter suction dredgers. The project will commence in 2014 and is expected to be completed in 2015.

    The scope of works, awarded to the joint venture – Dredging International NV and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock, include the widening and deepening of the Suez Canal over a length of 25 km and until a depth of -24m. The consortium has committed to execute the works within a very short time frame in accordance with the requirements of president al-Sisi. Six cutter suction dredgers (4 DI CSD’s and 2 GLDDC CSD’s) and two hopper dredgers (DI) including some auxiliary equipment will be mobilized to perform the job. Works will start immediately.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • The large drop in revenues and revenues net of brokerage fees, the significant legal and professional fees, and large operating losses have eroded the strength of our financial condition. We are managing our cash to fund our current operations through fiscal 2015. We may have to decrease our stock dividends and may make further cuts. Working capital is tight and we may have to explore other financing options if business does not increase and such financing options may not be available on favorable terms to us if at all.


    We are confronting a general decline in the life settlement markets and the fallout of the SEC action and the resulting private litigation. Regarding the life settlement markets, we believe that life settlements have desirable investment features that will eventually restore their attractiveness in the marketplace. We expect the supply of qualified life settlements to remain sufficient for our clients’ demand and believe the low correlation of life settlements returns to fixed-income and equity securities and their competitive rates offer an attractive alternative investment.

    Even though we were exonerated by the outcome of the SEC suit it is clear that the suit did damage to our reputation and our relationships within our licensee network and client base. We are working to rebuild confidence among our licensees and clients and to expand our client base. We continue to invest significantly in programs to develop and strengthen our relationships with new and inactive licensees. We have increased our communication with our client base, emphasizing the inherent benefits of life settlements as an asset class and the particular advantages of our settlements, which do not cap investor returns as do many of the settlements offered in the industry. We believe we are making progress in restoring the confidence and interest of our clients. We are exploring alternatives for expanding our client base, including new structures for investing in life settlements, such as the marketing of life settlements as securities. Over the last two calendar years, there have been over $112 million in payouts from our life settlement transactions.

    While we are working diligently on plans to increase business for both individual and institutional investors, our operating results for the First Half of this year are disappointing and we must do more to improve our operating results. Despite the increase in revenues, the significant legal and professional fees and the operating losses we experienced in fiscal 2014 have eroded the strength of our financial condition. We believe we have sufficient currently available working capital to fund our current operations through fiscal 2015. Our recurring operations are not currently generating sufficient cash to support operations. To supplement recurring operations, we have sold most of the settlements we held for investment. While we believe we could further support our working capital through other possible asset dispositions, borrowings or equity sales, our opportunities for generating significant cash apart from continuing operations are narrowing. We believe we must generate approximately $30 million in annual revenues to fund our operations and pay dividends, and we are working toward that end. Beginning in the Third Quarter of this year we will bill our life settlement investors for policy monitoring costs in order to recover the expenses of tracking policy premium payments and maturity payouts through the life settlement process. In addition, we are conserving our cash. We may reduce or eliminate the dividends for the remainder of fiscal 2015 and for 2016 to conserve working capital until we can realize improved operating results.

    Sentiment: Sell

  • Reply to

    Congress passes WRDA

    by rsp980 May 23, 2014 10:51 AM
    catalprod catalprod May 24, 2014 8:58 AM Flag

    Once Obama signs it we should see the pop. Short sighted investors still pouting after a weak first quarter where the worst winter in 20 years might possibly have been a factor??? The whole widened Panama Canal infrastructure play has yet to reach investors antennae but it will.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • equity committee appointed by US Trustee who blasts company plan to force the plan through in the proverbial dark of night-Law360, Wilmington (April 24, 2014, 9:35 PM ET) -- The U.S. Trustee’s Office blasted Dolan Co.’s Chapter 11 plan and related disclosure statement Thursday in Delaware bankruptcy court, arguing that it is missing crucial financial information and “challenges notions of due process and good faith” by seeking to be fast-tracked

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    steinway tower 111 w 57th

    by catalprod Apr 17, 2014 12:44 PM
    catalprod catalprod Apr 17, 2014 12:47 PM Flag

    also profiled in may 2014 issue of vanity fair - this months edition

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • great site to follow the progress of Ambases largest asset the Steinway Tower at 111 W 57th otherwise known as the stairway to heaven- newyorkyimby

    Sentiment: Strong Buy