Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

CEL-SCI Corporation Message Board

catchtoit 10 posts  |  Last Activity: Mar 10, 2015 11:40 AM Member since: Oct 30, 2009
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Reply to

    May 4th is the date to watch

    by graffpw Mar 9, 2015 2:45 AM
    catchtoit catchtoit Mar 10, 2015 11:40 AM Flag

    I didnt ask you for a comment...you have every right to make one.....but i agree...i made bad investment choices....um....its a little narrow minded for you to think it's either one or the other.....Im not short at all im long and under 40k. Have some empathy....why is everyone so argumentative!!! money really bring out the worst in people....im tired of this board this stock this game....its a waste of time.. people used to discuss issues here...now it's a sounding board for bad feelings...im guilty too. Cant you call just act like regular people and have discussion?

  • Reply to

    May 4th is the date to watch

    by graffpw Mar 9, 2015 2:45 AM
    catchtoit catchtoit Mar 10, 2015 11:21 AM Flag

    yeah? im 40 grand under cause of this stock I bring up whatever points I wish. Why dont you clean up your rhetoric. Im tired of you.

  • Reply to

    May 4th is the date to watch

    by graffpw Mar 9, 2015 2:45 AM
    catchtoit catchtoit Mar 10, 2015 1:14 AM Flag

    no responsible for manufacture or distribution? How can you say that? Geert is on record stating that the process is highly controlled in house only and that part of the big plan, to protect the substance from being compromised or copied.

  • Reply to

    May 4th is the date to watch

    by graffpw Mar 9, 2015 2:45 AM
    catchtoit catchtoit Mar 9, 2015 3:18 AM Flag

    Why 4 May? Why 50m? That's alot of money to give away without going to court....the old CRO went under....where are they going to get 50m??

    50m would have to fund us through 2018 and then further until a sale of a product can be made....fat salaries have to be paid....buildout of the plant needs to be completed. We cant make enough product to be worth anything! There isnt even an plan for insurance to pay for it....will it subsidized? we can charge what we want but that doesnt mean the insurance company will pay that price......ESPECIALLY government related insurance plans.....many many doctors dont even take TRICare...forget a specialist taking TRIcare. Is medicare going to pay for it?.....

    you guys are not thinking this out....you're just thinking about the big one time pop and fall back to reality....big spike in price then reality levels us out back at a new company without proven sales strategy...logistics....manufacturing....pricing....availability.....advertising....

    think it out people...its more than a stock trade....many many things have to go extremely right for this to be a 5 dollar company let alone make it up to 11 bucks so i can cash the heck out. You cant rewrite the gold standard of treatment if you're 300 spartans standing against persia....they were slaughtered by the bigger armies. Isnt the Pharmaceutical lobby the most lucrative out of the lot?

  • Reply to

    BASHERS...

    by wrkngitout Mar 6, 2015 7:43 AM
    catchtoit catchtoit Mar 9, 2015 3:07 AM Flag

    I disagree....health care at the local level is not driven by news stories. People still need to discover they have mouth cancer...and they still need to find a doctor that knows what to do with it and who to refer it to. Think of the 65 year old oncologist that has been doing the same thing over and over and over and over again.....maybe he's an old school doctor and doesn't refer his patients for new and unproven treatments....just because it hits the shelves doesnt mean doctors will want to jump on it. and it doesnt mean the patients want it.

    We haven't a clue about how the US will react....so far the US is barely involved. Why is that btw? Anyone have a reasonable answer for that? Honest question....why is the us not heavily involved in this trial? What would cause geert to say that the FDA will come in later to inspect the facility....why not now? Why not sloan kettering why not NYU....why not any major center.....? is it politics? it is pharmaceutical lobbyists?

    He's too tight lipped about serious issues that should be discussed more publicly. If he's got flippers looking to invest and are calling....and he says the product is so advanced I quote "good luck trying to copy it" and we have a 10 year patent.....I cant think of anything that would make this man so quiet about EVERYTHING. on the conference call geert avoided describing the callers questions about max's role in the company at this point.....what is max's role at 1m a year? hmm? excellent question shareholder caller.....no answer. hmmm

    what do 80 something's do in their companies? drink scotch? enjoy life? waste of money if it cannot be clearly articulated what his function is. smells to me. smells bad. but I do hope MK makes it.

  • Reply to

    BASHERS...

    by wrkngitout Mar 6, 2015 7:43 AM
    catchtoit catchtoit Mar 8, 2015 11:38 AM Flag

    I hear you and your enthusiasm. I love it. Sounds like many posters here over the years. Right up until their initial investment gets reversed by 10 and sinks to a handful of change. I want this to work badly too....but I did want to comment on one part. I do not believe centers and other countries are ASKING to be a part of anything. They're being recruited by the CRO whom is paid to go out and find them. If I could make an educated guess, I would say out of the few dozen doctors that are involved in this trial, there are hundreds of dozens of doctors that dont know about the trial....and then there's several hundred more that aren't interested at all until the FDA says it's ok to take a closer look and even then....most doctors are routine local folks and go with with they know....and their medical education is outdated....they aren't cutting edge immunotherapy conscious primary care providers......remember thats the first person you go see...local yokel dr doolittle has to refer to you an oncologist and lets face it...unless you're at a major medical center in a major urban mecca, you're gonna get the standard. Which has nothing to do with Multikine. When and if approved.....it could take years for the news to spread to the local level.

    People with mouth cancers are typically not on the up and up with their healthcare.

    GO Cel Sci.....i hope we make it by the end of the decade.

  • Reply to

    Conference Caller with a question

    by catchtoit Feb 24, 2015 10:42 AM
    catchtoit catchtoit Feb 24, 2015 2:39 PM Flag

    we all get trash talked on here...me too dont feel bad.

    What I think about River is something different. I was just talking to you....well...have a nice horizontal day =o)

  • Reply to

    Conference Caller with a question

    by catchtoit Feb 24, 2015 10:42 AM
    catchtoit catchtoit Feb 24, 2015 1:21 PM Flag

    lol...you have a bad attitude...you come across as hostile. It sounded like it could be a match...I didn't ASSUME...i ASKED you...directly.

  • On the conference call.....Was that thick NY accent you Yankee?

  • catchtoit by catchtoit Feb 21, 2015 1:47 PM Flag

    confidant about arbitration finalization. Makes the board members hollering about they lost....liars.

    Is using the CRADA in SanDiego as a way to get some "intermediate" data on Multikine out there for the public.

    Has to wait for 298 patients to pass away. Stated will take till end of 2017 to get completed data.

    Said the number of months necessary to get FDA review is unimportant whether it be 2,3,5, or 6 months. Sounds like it won't take long. Says that is trivial at this point. He says he is laser focused on competing the phase 3.

CVM
1.04+0.1451(+16.21%)Apr 24 4:00 PMEDT