I am in incredible physical shape, would challenge anyone 15 to 20 years younger to anything, and my finances are perfectly fine. I just hang around out of morbid curiosity to see if OMEX management ever does anything positive for long shareholders. If they do one thing truly shareholder friendly I will leave. I want to know what makes dysfunctional management tick and if they are capable of changing. I have the answers to most of my questions.
"the couple they found the first trip were left as a f you to whoever went back to look"
Funny you say that, that's what I thought originally, and I've done similar things on my dives for two reasons (1) to let others know someone had been there first, or (2) should I return I have an exact place to start again. After all its hard to get your bearings when you are undersea, especially if you return years later. If the bars were stacked on top of each other, or right next to each other, with nothing else around, then that was something that should have been explained to shareholders.
Congrats on another GREAT year OMEX longs!
Big red flag there fellas. NO thanks!
Apple users seem oblivious they are stuck in the equivalent of black and white Pleasantville when they should be furious that their ecosystem is so blasé.
Congrats to all long term OLED longs, all 2% of you who somehow managed to hold without selling the last five years. The active traders, including some of the criminal shorts probably did better but you know what, in the end the OLED longs were RIGHT. And being right has to mean something, otherwise, the stock market is a total sham. Personally given a choice between being right or making money, I always choose being right over making money.
I can feel it coming in the Air tonight, O LED
And I've been waiting for this moment, for all my life OLED OLED
Its like the battle of Waterloo, Rothchild knew Wellington had won a day before anyone else, but somberly sold his stock like Wellington lost, inciting a panic. He then bought into the sell off at pennies on the dollar. Must be a few Rothchild agents keeping a lid on OLED share price, because the share price is really the only way the masses will know OLED won, right? Rarely does one get an opportunity like this in the Information Age.
Good for them, being first OLED TVs I hope they make huge obnoxious profits, they deserve it, then maybe others will want to be first with OLED and make huge obnoxious profits on other products. Its all good.
All who claim OLED is an insignificant fruit fly compared to the mighty Apple are dead wrong. Instead, OLED is a hungry groundhog expanding its range and is looking at the Apple and licking its chops. Displays are a huge factor in smart phone design and it is imperative that the public be maneuvered into believing Apple Retina displays are the best even when they are not. As we have seen this maneuvering is done by manipulation and deception on many levels, but eventually the truth cannot be denied and even the biggest Apple fanboy will be forced to concede the days of Retina LCD are over and Apple is far behind the display curve. Lies are not forgotten, false perceptions change in a hurry, payback is a beech, and the day is fast coming when all the deception and manipulation is undone in the blink of an eye. You gotta be in OLED when it happens because it will happen very fast.
Reverse false advertising is not illegal. If OLED displays are superior in every possible way to Retina LCD displays, then if Apple advertises a Retina in its product but actually provides a far superior OLED, they aren't doing anything wrong. I can't believe OLED beats Retina LCD at everything but maybe it does now.
It appears the technology has totally changed, but Apple insists on calling it by the same old technology name, Retina. Flexible Retina to be exact. All Retinas to date are LCD technology, but flexible retina is not. The consumer needs to be told the truth about the actual design. If I bought a car advertised with "flexible gasoline" technology and after buying it found out that it was actually a Diesel engine, I would wonder why did they have to lie about the engine type. If the answer is that well Apple has to protect their advertising gravitas on their other products by telling fibs about the Iwatch, well I'm sorry, as a consumer I don't care about that. TELL THE TRUTH.
Baghdad Tim is perhaps best known for his grandiose and grossly unrealistic Retina display propaganda broadcasts before and after the so-called "Display Wars" extolling the invincibility of e Retina Display and the permanence of Retina Rule, even absurdly describing, with a straight face, superior OLED displays in his own products as Retina displays. His announcements were intended for an Apple cult audience subject to Tim Cook rule and state censorship.
So they nullified the Iwatch OLED news simply by not releasing any news. Bravo, well played, Simple yet brilliant, I didn't see that coming. But now its hard not to conclude that by refusing to mention OLED, Apple is not behind the OLED shorts in one way or another. Its all starting to make sense now.
Iwatch should have been a oval OLED lightweight bracelet design that you could hardly notice was there. it could have been awesome. Instead it is a clunky metal old mans watch design, complete with an 18k model lol. Apple apparently polled people to come up with the watch design, instead, Apple should have done the design themselves then said "Here this is what you want". THAT is the Apple way, not polling people to see what they want.
Iwatch design is horrible its an mans Timex wristwatch, they really blew it.
Frankly I'm stunned the design is so horrible, it should have been sleek and round with a display all the way around to function as an awesome display device plus incredible fashion accessory. Instead it looks like something an old man might wear in the nursing home. Can you imagine running with that anchor on your wrist? I can't.
Not another clunky, boring looking watch that people already don't want to wear and that's the same as all other watches.