Oracle Corporation Message Board
-
and they are as liberal of a news service as you can get...
BTW.... now that its an established fact that Holder lied to congress in the AP/ James Rosen Fox scandal...
we really need to reinvestigate his prior testimony especially on Fast & Furious -
and then their unions make sure they are protected and get paid
-
There remains no reason to be long at these levels
good riddance -
That the Obama administration poured $10s of millions into.... starting in starting in early 2011..
and it just so happens that the IRS under Obama worked to silence conservative groups free speech so that they could not get their message out in Ohio
Yep Barack's hand look real dirty.... Chicago politics exported on a national basis -
The question raised by the e-mails released by the WH have a glaring omission
No where does the CIA... or FBI intel... or even the Dept of State mention the You Tube video... in fact the e-mails show that both the CIA and FBI were in agreement with the immediate blame on Al Qaeda
So the question is who decided to put the reference to the You Tube video into the Benghazi talking points...
What was the motivation to remove Al Qaeda and blame a video... could it be for political reasons?
The name of Axelrod has started to pop up... but that only raises some pretty big questions because he no longer worked at the WH and was running the Obama campaign
Why would a campaign mgr have the ability to rework a national security memo?
Just him having real time access to the intel would be a serious breach of security clearance.... did Barack the magnificent have contact with Axelrod on this issue?
Yesterday... the WH turned over about 95 e-mails.... what do the thousands of other on this topic say? -
Henry Blodgett.... a disgraced liar questions if Obama's scandals are actually scandals
Well Henry.... you're famously convicted for the inability to call things what they truly are - Reply to
huge surge in PAC tax exempt requests in last few years (and pubs say no questions can be asked)
by delucks345 •May 15, 2013 1:04 PMCan you comprehend that there is a huge difference in questioning an old organization like the NAACP that has made questionable filings...
And questioning an entity before that entity even exists in the eyes of the IRS?
Why didn't Obama's stooges wait till status was granted and filings made?
Because he wanted to silence them before they had money they could spend against him in an election cycle - Reply to
huge surge in PAC tax exempt requests in last few years (and pubs say no questions can be asked)
by delucks345 •May 15, 2013 1:04 PMInterestingly there were less requests for conservative PACs than for PACs organized to lobby for labor unions...
Yet only the conservative PACs were targeted by the IRS
Now if that aint a smoking gun.... - Reply to
so teaparty PACs ask for tax free status.....but cry foul when asked to prove it?
by delucks345 •May 15, 2013 9:02 AMThe status is a simple bureaucratic process.
Tell me what probable cause under the law the IRS had to question an application... prior to any possible wrongdoing under that status even being possible... (Kinda like charging a baby with its mothers crime of shooting drugs prior to the baby's birth)
The status cannot be questioned under the LAW until a violation of the LAW is suspected (actual evidence is in fact necessary) and a violation cannot possibly take place until AFTER the status is granted
You prove yourself to be a bigger fool with each utterance.... you wouldn't qualify to play an idiot in dumb and dumber -
Nixon kept an enemies list...
Kinda like Obama going after political organizations that don't agree with him....
Reporters that print what his administration leaks....
Hey here is a thought... IF Obama had a leak in his corrupt administration... he should have investigated his administration... not the reporters that reported the leaked info - Reply to
so teaparty PACs ask for tax free status.....but cry foul when asked to prove it?
by delucks345 •May 15, 2013 9:02 AMToo bad they asked for info prior to it being due in a filing.
The IRS is only empowered to question after they suspect wrong doing which can only occur in a tax filing
At which point they need to first acquire evidence of wrong doing... and when they have probable cause then the IRS may ask for an explanation
so get your facts straight... your version of events here is as bad as earlier today when you said Nixon hired thugs... he did no such thing... even Hillary Clinton will acknowledge Nixon had no knowledge of the break in until after it happened... it was the cover up that was the problem...
Do I need to explain why Obama's balls are in a vice over Benghazi... engaging in a cover up for political purposes - Reply to
so teaparty PACs ask for tax free status.....but cry foul when asked to prove it?
by delucks345 •May 15, 2013 9:02 AMHere in America... under our Constitution.... it Is the government that must prove wrong doing
Not the other way around where an individual or entity has "prove" that they have not done anything wrong..
as the old saying goes.... you can't prove a negative
That's why its called a witch hunt.... just like in Salem.... innocents couldn't prove they weren't witches... by any other means than drowning - Reply to
Secretary of HHS again violates law and Constitution --- time for her to go
by blackmesainterloper •May 14, 2013 4:23 PMThis isn't Selibus' first transgression..... she used to make political comments in speeches that were on the govt dime...
She got itch slapped then but now its time for criminal charges
Barack Obama... do you hold yourself accountable for any of the crimes your cabinet member commit? -
That's right... Obama's been plowing him so hard he's bleeding profusely
- Reply to
NBC (very liberal) reporter says Obama version of events on Benghazi doesn't add up
by central_scrutinizer_fz •May 14, 2013 2:28 PMThe fool that Obama is... he doesn't know who his very best friends are...
By alienating the press to the extent he has by spying on them... he has lost them - Reply to
The bottom line on the dishonest, lying Obama Presidency............
by blackmesainterloper •May 14, 2013 3:37 PMWith Benghazi.. Obama's problem started because he was lying in his campaign when he was saying that Al-Qaeda was defeated on the run...
When Al-Qaeda successfully killed an American ambassador... on 9/11 no less.... in what was obviously a terrorist strike
Obama had to tell even bigger lies to cover-up the facts on the ground in Benghazi and the fact that his campaign rhetoric was based on lies to begin with
Then he complicates it further by not doing anything to help the Americans under attack.... and having Hillary and others deny the fact that additional security had been asked for more than 60 days prior and they ignored the request
Clearly a cover up for political purposes... where Americans died.... its far worse than a couple of guys breaking into a campaign office in some DC hotel
Now Obama... in the midst of a crisis of scandal... refers to Benghazi as a politically motivated side show....
He's got that half right.. the whole of Benghazi is politically motivated... but it certainly aint no sideshow -
Fails the smell test....
As more and more liberal media turns on Obama it will be very ugly -
was that a steel wheel that just rolled by?
Holder will resign in shame within a few days
Let's hope that Holder rolls on Obama and what Barack knew of Fast & Furious.... like what difference would it make (thanks Hillary) if yet another scandal came to a new boiling point this week -
Barack Obama had a great fall....
All the administrations lib spin misters....
Couldn't put the Presidency together again -
with 3 years 7 months left in his administration...
That would normally be a bad thing for America..... but not with Obama as the lame duck president