Why don't you post some sources from real nonpartisan economists then.
""Fact is right recently the effect of globalization has been flat to decreasing.""
Sure a minor decrease in a huge value is technically a decrease, but this has no relevance to the economy and especially employment.
The market is near highs. The main reason for this and growing wealth inequality has been globalization which lets corporations hire labor at overseas rates and sell product at first world rates.
There I fixed it for ya.
I see you are too dim to understand or too deceitful and cowardly to discuss in good faith. Yet again !!
Your simple minded analogy doesn't apply to the market manipulation discussion because it's result is binary, like your thinking. There is no way to evaluate different values of "getting to the grocery".
Lets consider climbing a mountain. You are unhappy that the climbers reached the summit by taking the easy route. You make no claim about the summit being the summit, you only argue about the route taken.
So if I pay $3.05 / gallon for gas should i be simultaneously accepting with respect to the cost and fret endlessly over the minutiae of what factors led to the price. After all I have the option to not buy the gas if I so choose. You didn't forget this point about the FREE market did you?
So why is it that you find fault with prices paid by willing participants in a market where each participant has the ultimate freedom to choose his course.
Actually, further funny is that you don't even understand my point much less being ready to actually address it.
It's like becoming disenchanted with your newly built home after discovering migrant labor had built it. In other words completely irrational and emotionally based thinking.
Too funny to assert that the 'where' doesn't matter but the 'how' one arrived there does matter is a sign of dogmatic idealistic half witted thinking.
He has become a slumlord. His LLC is Meridian properties or something like that.
Higher rates equals cheaper housing prices.
There is no monetary inflation. You don't know the difference between this and scarcity inflation.
And your logic is flawed. The 'next' recession would start immediately if the fed raised rates today.
Every other day the market does something you don't think is right.
That would tell most people ( rational people ) something about their thinking.
Predicting the changes to a random process can be done by most any idiot 50% of the time.
I am however surprised 'you' can do that well.
Why don't you use 2008 figures. When booshes mess began imploding.
""Further I post brilliant, insightful posts that get nothing""
Posting in your dreams is not the same.
Because you are desperate to blame a black president for the cost of bushes war and globalization hollowing out the middle class and decimating the labor class.
No the victory stems from your internal understanding of your failure which leads you to S da #$%$ Upo about them.
There are many ideas of his that he no longer mentions here, those are my victories no matter what the old skinbag claims about 'winning'.
Of corse many others have taught him successfully as well.
His pitiful drivel about our president and his market conspiracies are all he has left now.
And his posts are espousing an ever diminishing clutch of ignorant RWNJ ideas.
Brings me back to one of the first ones. The idy ot denied that conservative thinking was Darwinist.
Of course he didn't at the time know what that meant.
It's been a long journey board scientist and gawd knows I deserve compensation for the lessons I have taught you but I can let that slide as just my contribution to the whole of humanity through silencing large portions of your ignorance,
You have done well David
well if you had a point it must have been trivial. Like your thinking