Not a shred of this is true. I take you cannot read mathematical notion or are a habitual liar.
Anybody interested go search
"infinite number of tosses of a fair coin" on math.stackexchange.
IF you will notice creeky the proof from math1000 had the ( 1/n) term so it was not the sum. But hey you don't know the difference so I guess you can be excused again.
Hawcreek is unable to grasp any of it. Evidently he thinks a sum and an average are the same thing at infinity. Evidently he cannot understand what the responses were on the page.
Or he could just be in "tell any lie and say anything" to avoid admitting error mode.. He has done it before.
You like to make a fool out of yourself here, you give us examples daily.
So what you are saying is that the result is the unintentional consequence of the action ??
McCarthy:
"" What you're going to see is a conservative speaker, that takes a conservative Congress, that puts a strategy to fight and win. And let me give you one example""
Too hard for you to understand ??
All the answers to our question agreed with me. You are a clueless moron.
Need an example ??
""As I understand your response the sum becomes the average and both tend to zero""
What that pesky ( 1/ n) term is just ignored at infinity ??
Maybe you realize that this is what makes the AVERAGE zero but NOT the sum..
No I doubt it. You only know engunear math.
He listed the Benghazi probe as an EXAMPLE of actions a conservative congress and speaker would undertake to beat Hillary. U still clueless aren't ya.
Blah blah blah blah..... More blah blah blah blah....to infinity with hawcreek.
That is why the world mystifies you hawcreek
You really don't understand averages. It really isn't possible that you attended any college at all with that kinda ignorance.
Here's a hint. The average is THE SUM divided by the number of things averaged. It is not THE average.
I really don't think you are that stupid. You just have a problem with being wrong. I am here to help you with that.
It never was about the average, you knew that all along. No the sum does not become the average. Where do you get this nonsense.
So as you can see wottow thinks you are wrong as well. Could this be a milestone?? You may have to admit you were wrong..
Yes you have it right.
And you have lost. If you trouble yourself to go look search "infinite number of tosses of a fair coin"
You will see there that the posters have stated the probability of the sum equaling zero at infinity is zero. By the way for people other than hawcreek math stackexchange is pretty neat site.
Another comment supporting me.
""Where do the statistics say that? The law of large numbers says that the proportion of heads and the proportion of tails will both converge on one half in this example, but that is not the same as saying the numbers of each will be equal.""
How many will it require before you understand you are wrong. Yeah I know another infinity in the mix.
On average the sum will be zero for a toss of 20 flips. Does this mean that the probability of a 20 flip run being zero is certainty??
You must be incapable of shame. But thanks for the entertainment.
Infinity is not a place you can be at and stop. It is a direction. Anybody who knows calculus knows that you don't find any spot called infinity and just stop.
One person answered in my favor, get ready for many others.
""the probability that the number of heads equals the number of tails (after an even number of tosses) tends towards zero as the number of tosses increases without limit""
I posted this question on math stackexchange.
""So carried to infinity does the fact of equal probabilities for head and tails make the particular random walk from these tosses go to zero. In other words will the walk tend to zero distance at infinity because the flips obey the probabilities of the fair coin.""
So hawstupid is this the way you think about it??
No idea what you are talking about. That makes two of us.
Creek piszed down his leg again. Obviously he never took calculus in civul engunear skool. Or else they dumb it down for engunears.
The value of a function or process at infinite tries is the evaluation of a limit to infinity. For a limit to infinity to exist the output value must get ever closer to the limiting value as the domain value increases indefinitely.
His hypothesis that a coin toss summed up and carried to infinity must always equal zero violates the common understanding of a limit to infinity. There is no such thing as 'infinity' by itself if one cannot understand that some quantity is approaching a constant as you go that way.
The RMS distance from zero for the coin toss sum grows as the square root of the number of throws. Carried to infinity the RMS distance is infinity and the probability of the sum being zero at any particular stopping point goes to zero. Exactly the opposite of his idea.
He is confused about the difference between the outcome of a single experiment carried on to infinity and the average value of the experiment when each end result is averaged an infinite number of times.
But he is a scientist... LOL !!!!!
On average the sum will be zero but any particular run even to infinity will NOT. What ya got next.. Enjoying this immensely.
""Why bother mentioning infinity""
Because you made the moronic mistake of claiming that the coin toss carried to infinity would with certainty sum to zero.
Why you said such a stupid thing I don't know but it is sure fun to push it up in front for all and you to see.
Yes if you notice for the definition of taking a limit to infinity the fact is that one more step breaks the convergence then the limit does not exist. The same answer came from the math stackexchange post.
Dum Dum dum you are.