Who would want it. "CLASS" is a definition of particular behaviors that elevate the ego of narcissists and pour scorn on the undeserving.
Yet another set of rules that are worshiped by conservatives.
the board scientist gets exposed as just another flunkie instead of a "scientist"
It reaaally is fun watching the old shriveled up loser try to hold on to imaginary glory days.
Lets see if we can get a little dose of his wizdumb now.
Given a coin toss experiment of N tries with heads recorded as 1 and tails recorded as -1 and the values of the N tries summed into value S.
What happens to the probability that S exceeds 20 as N is increased.
It is a very tiny group that is dwindling daily who do this. The more intelligent of these realize that the gross oversimplifications put on our president by his haters are not really an accurate measure of his performance.
Did you know that drivers in Florida can park their cars on the interstate and tie up traffic with absolutely no repercussions to themselves.
without your permission.
Imagine a car business OWNER went to the bank and borrowed $10M to repair his fire damaged dealership so he can resume business. He used this opportunity to update his operation and a year later is selling 20% more cars / year after the improvement.
Or i guess he could have just closed his doors and lets the rats take over the wreckage while declaring bankruptcy.
A lie by exclusion. Claiming "voters in Colorado can print ballots" without the necessary qualification is a lie.
I stated to the board scientist that people in Florida can block traffic on interstates without repercussions.
Of course this is true in the specific sense but a lie when conveyed as a general truth over the population.
I don't think RWNJ know the difference.
No it isn't unfortunately. Yahoo willingly allows this forum to be used for overt political posting mostly because it gains page hits and that is what they sell.
If you are looking for a real financial board I'm afraid this won't do.
taking it fully rearward i see for faux news.. No you are wrong when a statement is made without a qualification then the domain of the statement is assumed 'everywhere' by default.
If not courts would have a hell of a time settling cases when each given statement carried an uncertain domain of application.
This is simply a case of yet again faux news lying on air with a weak cover story in case they get caught. Should sound familiar to you.
loosely gathered havealuses are seldom a threat to eddy currents while ears are being shaved for thoughlessness
do you get the difference between the likelihood of individual infection vs group infection
So lets get this straight. You are willing to accept the logical conclusions of any statement and vow to not challenge such a statement if any part of it is true regardless of the context with which is was put forth.
So if I say that people can drag you from your car in Florida when they decide to do so and you cannot fight back you have no argument against this ???
This is an example of RWNJ truth.
IS it true or not ??
Of course it is true in the proper context. But generally it is a lie
Hawfeces would have you believe that this juvenile language trick is legitimate and sound reasoning.
how pathetic is that
Donuts have holes.
Dogs have spots.
Red Necks watch nascar.
All unquestionably true because faux news said voters can print out their ballots.
Never mind that ONLY some could print out their ballots and successfully submit them.
So the new standard for conservative truth is that only one instance of an example makes the general
statement valid. It's OK if they want it this way, there is lots of hay to make with this type of stereotyping.
Should we all devolve into word games??
Always a pessimist with a black man in the WHITE house..