The lead RWNJ on this board is terribly afraid to post a straight up on the level exposition of his ideas yet again. He hides behind riddles, anecdotes, innuendo, insults, nonsense and really anything to get words on the server without exposing his ideas to potential rebuttal. He pushes his bravado here while refraining from exposing himself by making a statement of position.
Case in point the last thread on net neutrality. Can anyone find what his actual position is against it.
He seems to claim that net neutrality aims to tax the internet to support liberal causes.
I don't know if this is really his message, please look at it and correct me if you discern the message.
The take home is that he is a bravado wearing coward who hides behind clever wordplay and distraction.
He is pathetic.
Lets clear this up for once. You don't post a reasonable, direct, and clear answer to this question and many more like it because you think you are being clever but the real reason is that at some level you are afraid of being outed as wrong. Why else would you reply with riddles, anecdotes, insults, misdirection and other variants of cowardice.
I'm game, we can play this same thing for months or years because no matter what you think it looks like to the outside world it really looks like you are an idiot. Remember I do have a better seat to observe how you appear to the world than you have.
I don't believe I have ever discussed a topic with anyone who was such a fanny as you.
Wrong thread. This one is about how you RWNJ think prohibiting interference with the internet will interfere with the internet.
So is it that you think the tax money will be used to fund content.
Yeah they will stop at nothing to put in the American psyche the idea that a black man cannot be president.
Yes, this time in a moderately coherent format if you are up to it.
BTW you must be kompuker.
You are in the wrong thread. How about you take up the task of explaining how net neutrality results in censoring.
They don't like to think, they get that from their hero boosh who famously said he wouldn't argue with himself.
Since you RWNJ Ayezwypes will not man up I just keep making fun of you.
I am genuinely perplexed by how the RWNJ can maintain this position about net neutrality.
I call upon Wotow to try to explain their side. I feel like the guy who sees a square with no corners in the
sci fi movies. It just makes no sense. This level of idiocy from the RWNJ is scrambling what little there is of my brain.
Wottow or anybody can you explain what this is about.
""You fool! Is your electricity taxed? Your Telephone? How about your water? Gasoline? ""
""Net neutrality is about turning the internet into a government run utility. Control, tax, regulate, throttle, etc.""
Is your electricity, telephone, gas, water throttled ???
Yeah but they can look progressively more stupid, which they excel at.
""No, idiot, you are. How else can unpopular, non self sustaining content make it to the Internet. A FCC commissioner agrees that paying through a tax will be required to implement net neutrality.""
Ok yes I admit there is a possibility of a tax to support a public utility, I did have to look that up to find out about it.
So the same tax that is levied on other utilities will be levied against internet providers.
So now exactly how does this limit any entities traffic on the net??
I have been discussing net neutrality with one of your kind.
His last response was this which I cannot understand at all.
( i said ) - "Nothing is currently barring the creation of any content ..."
Wrong, idiot. Leftist cr*p that does not pay it's own way bars it from being created. If it is created few read it, it is simply a tax to stop some of the content Obama does not like, nothing more. The FCC commissioner agrees a tax is required
Now this cryptic post is somehow related to the debate over net neutrality.
Can any of you similarly handicapped RWNJ translate from stew pid to at least the average intelligence level.