""Well, I know I'm right.""
Well i am sure you do. But how can you ever learn anything if you stay in your denial bubble.
Anyway the board thanks you for bumping this joke up, seeing dunning kruger in action is always a hoot.
It's your time hawfaeces, I would stop wearing shoes altogether if I were you, don't want to start any nuk uler reactions in them ...........Soooooooooooooo funny.
I said it would be about an hour.
Any time now
I know that, dats why I said I was messing with him. Seeing if he would post something indicating he didn't know.
"" Look up implosion triggering""
I don't need to . The pressure is a by product of what the implosion is attempting to accomplish. It is forcing the material in a close enough proximity ( atom to atom ) so that the reaction is started AND sustained by the naturally decaying material that make up the bomb. The pressure itself other than creating density has absolutely nothing to do with it.
Wow thanks for being such a hoot, this should provide material for the whole weekend unless you are ready to admit you were wrong and clueless.
He will be back with an off the wall explanation...
Lets mess with him some more.
Accordin to wiki pee di ah
"""The fission of a heavy nucleus requires a total input energy of about 7 to 8 million electron volts""
Thats a lotta volts eh hawscientist. Do ya think it comes from static electricity makin a spark, how many "volts" is that ...
And the hits keep rolling.
"It is rare because the odds of the precise split are miniscule. Pressure reeplaces heat to begin the action, the exothermic result provides ignition for body fat "
Now surely you aren't going to fill the board with Obama bashing to drown out your little expansion of the understanding of nuclear science are ya.
The board scientist stepped out a bit and enlightened us a bit with his vast knowledge of the physical sciences. And boi what a grand ole result it was.
Here is a summary.
1 Macroscale normal movement of objects can generate enough pinpoint energy ( a particle OR wave if you are so inclined ) to initiate the splitting of a single atom in a tennis shoe.
2 Such a split atom releases enough energy to either generate further fission reaction in said shoe.
Generate enough heat to set said shoe on fire.....
Now of course he will delete this statement and claim it was referring to the best method of cooking fried chicken or some other seemingly unrelated topic.
So only YOU the reader can gleam what you think the board scientist was referring to in this gem of a post.
Spontaneous human combustion is an extension of the "when it's your time, it's your time" theorem.
It is caused by the nearly but obviously not completely infintesimally long odds that some action by the human such as dragging a shoe across a hard surface, splits an atom.
you heard it here first, I solved that issue years ago.
So what is the energy output of a single split atom. You can pick the atom.
And what is the minimum ignition energy of the most flammable substance you can imagine??
How would mechanical movement generate a particle with enough energy to split an atom..
Another hawfreek misstep for the record books to go with.
Averaging doesn't improve accuracy.
CO2 is absorbed back at the same rate as we emit it.
The greenhouse effect doesn't exist.
.... The list is very long.