Wouldn't it have been easier to bomb the #$%$ out of the stockpile from the air.
Nope this is nonsense. The reason we went into Iraq was to generate chaos and instability, and protect the petrodollar.
Mainly to make sure chaos rules there and no organized activity can lead to the sale of oil in currencies other than the dollar.
I believe you are the one whining and fussing like a high school girl.
Still no logical connection from you about what effect a military assault in the middle east would have on those here.
I really should learn to take your posts in a concrete framework. You are very good at making statements that appear to those versed in the common usage of English to mean one thing but you of course mean the usage a schizophrenic would
imply.. Anyway it really is a degraded and weak form of discourse. But if that is all you have then have at it. I'll be watching for it.
I do think it is a positive step that you finally acknowledge that money alone can and nearly always does drive terrorism.
There may be hope for you yet.
I didn't realize our allies ( Japan , Korea , Germany ) were threatened by this movement. Do tell what will they ride their camels across the ocean and wage war against our allies.
""virtually 100% of the security experts disagree""
Point to some NON PARTISAN links .....That's NOT RWNJ sites like Fox,Beck,Hannity,Rush in case you didn't know.
Nope it's just another attempt by the one percent to pull your strings so they can make money off war. Thats it and you willingly oblige by letting your strings get pulled.
OK genius. Tell me what happens to those militants "In the USA" if we wage full on war with them wherever they are in the middle east.
Don't hurt yourself thinking or nothin.
""The U.S. has a job to do, a responsibility in the world""
Did your big eye in the sky tell you this??
No actually we do not. Find where the founding fathers outlined this mission.
He is sending the world a 'message' that the USA is no longer ( at least during his term ) a gun for hire on the world stage. Iraq should still be under the control of Saddam Hussein, he is the devil we knew well , but now who knows. One thing is for sure, there is no conceivable direct military threat to the USA from the middle east turmoil. Some RWNJ spinners have tried ( would you believe it ) to claim that the hardline faction will gain enough equipment to mount a successful assault on the US mainland.
They never miss any opportunity to yell about the sky falling as long as progressive people are leading.
Now terrorist threats .... Well they are a relatively constant presence having little to do with who has which piece of dirt under their control. Defensive measures and intelligence are the main tools of securing the US from attack. So go out and enjoy the sunshine without any worries propagated by RWNJ agitators who are either double digit IQ or blatant manipulators, OR ... a linear combination of the two.
No, they are driven to hold their positions by people at the top who want a darwinistic society and have found many good levers to pull to rile up the double digit IQ crowd.
The country was built on immigration. YOU descended from immigrants.
However the country is not built by warfare, unless you count wars to keep oil cheap.
""Bush was not out golfing while in Crawford, it was a different place to work.""
But the citizens of the USA do not generally profit from his 'brush cutting' work as he spent so much time doing.
It's simple, it was his vacation spot. He set it up to look like he was working there but really not so much.
It is you making the arbitrary distinction that crawford is a place of work and Hawaii is not. The fact is bush spend many more days in this 'alternative' white house as you spin it than Obama spent in Hawaii.
No he is not. Why don't you learn some EngRish ??
He is referring so a specific group of criticisms that are unfair. He is not referring to the ACT of criticizing, he IS referring to the content of specific criticisms as being unfair.