What makes you think I have a lot of information on faux. They are a shill media source designed primarily to drive the less intelligent with hyper emotional reporting heavily laced with suggestion and rhetoric.
It doesn't take an intelligent person more than 10 min viewing to arrive at that conclusion.
NPR , PBS The Economist, Foreign Policy, Financial Times...
Now you can understand why fauz propaganda doesn't belong in this group.
The group who dislike Obama didn't vote for him. So why would you think it contradictory that those who dislike him could not be motivated by race based solely on re election.
What you fail to understand is that the garbage you get on talk radio and faux really speaks for a minority of the US population. Of course you don't know this because any media that brings you intelligent and relevant information is rejected by you as 'eeeeeviiiiillll'.
What you are missing simple idiot is that we wouldn't be here to consider fine tuning unless the factors were right. So if you can grasp it the wondering about the improbabilities and tying this to divine creation is the height of stupidity.
Let me put it on your level. Do you think it a miracle that the grand canyon was created so near the gift shop at the park.
Not necessarily but you could start by pushing your senators to introduce legislation making it illegal.
But I don't think you would do that, because in other circumstances you would be just fine with meddling at tax payer expense.
You find one relatively isolated example of an incorrect scientific consensus and use it as though it were relevant.
So what becomes of the world if we decide to ignore scientific consensus whenever it pleases us. Maybe we should all be smoking cigarettes.
"Spending tax dollars to affect a foreign election would be an impeachable offense"
Is this the first time the USA has meddled in foreign elections ?
I guess if we have done it before then all parties involved were working for free ?
As usual you miss the whole point. Of course there is not 100% certainty but then people who have to make real decisions in life rarely have that level of reliability in their data. They go with the expected best outcome given the risks and penalties or rewards.
The potential damage to the Earths carrying capacity and our economic security is very high with a high likelihood of the damaging scenario materializing so rational individuals have decided that cutting back on luxury fossil fuel consumption is a wise idea.
What you RWNJ have against the theory is a subject for future psychological studies but for now your unfounded opinions are confusing the public and delaying any solutions.
""The bones found where they were supposed to be""
In a Bulgarian Church ??
"It's really stretching it to think that material from the first century can end up all the way in this church in Bulgaria and still be there for archaeologists to excavate," Higham said. "But stranger things have happened."
You can't be serious...
Did you get this little tidbit of newz from faux..
You can't be serious...
Did you get this little tidbit of newz from faux
So either he lied or was a colossal buffoon, either way I don't care you can pick. The take away is that an ignorant president can do much damage.
Thank the big eye in the sky that Obama took over.
Yup maybe so. Are there no other organizations with money to spend and an interest that opposes the IPCC.
Where is the research to counter the MMGW hypothesis?
OH you mean the energy industry is tooooo cheap to fund any studies that enhance their side ??
Well why not ? Maybe they know there isn't ANY credible science to counteract eh ??
Hey wait now, his gifted son Andrew Nevin Walkins got a degree in telecommunications and they don't just give those out to anybody.
PhD in ecology ?? An educated man for sure, maybe you could say he has a 'science' degree. But his training doesn't qualify him to evaluate MMGW theory.
Nice work though at least you found ONE educated person to use in your denial work.
Anyone discussing warmer vs colder 'periods' without specifying a statistical analysis of the time series is just playing expert for a paycheck.
Probably a lot of people feel that way about you.
Or an ignorant buffoon who gets all his info from talk radio and faux newz and due to his dunning Kruger thinks he is qualified to criticize government policy every day that a dark skinned man is leading the country.