Whatever currency weather it be beads , bitcoin, gold or dollars is not as important as the assets that it can purchase. That is the wealth . The property, the company, the power of what is built with the money and the demand for that asset.
Charts farts.. Gee, I just had to say that. Seriously higher would be nice and quick if Google announced a Twitter purchase.
He is right but often not at the right time. Seems like KR is a good company. The question WHY is the stock going down?
He wants to prosecute states that have legalized pot too. Says he will not stand for the legalization of weed.
Googl, Kmi, Luv, cni. Percentages Googl being the largest position , cni the smallest. All in all a great week. Lookin for more gains but all positions would be strong buys on any pullbacks to add to.Good luck and have a great week.
What a fool you are. Past means nothing now. Hop on board while GOOGL is cheap. So much potential going forward with YouTube as well as wireless and potential energy ventures. You just sound like an old fashioned bore.
Sentiment: Strong Buy
S&P CAPITAL IQ REITERATES STRONG BUY OPINION ON CLASS A SHARES OF GOOGLE INC.s. GOOGL posts Q1 non-GAAP EPS of $6.57 vs. $6.27, below our estimate of $6.69 and the Capital IQ consensus of $6.61. Revenues rose 12%, and 17% using constant currency, aided by mobile search. Importantly, we think, YouTube advertising such as TrueView has been gaining traction. Also, non-GAAP
8:35 am ET April 24, 2015 (S&P Capital IQ) Print
We raise our 12-month target by $15 to $650, on revised relative P/E and P/E-to-growth analysis. However, we lower our EPS estimates for '15 to $28.42 from $29.30 and '16 to $32.52 from $34.09, given forex headwindoperating margin widened slightly, indicating better spending discipline.
Those are the shorties who didn't have a vision and so they believe Google must lack one as well. To their question my answer is, "Whatever they want to.."
6 billion payout worse case scenario leaves google still with billions and a excellent credit rating.
Nothing . That is what it costs for Google in proportion to their huge sums to launch their little flings and as you called the monster with too many heads . Its like someone buying a candy bar. No dent whatsoever in the ability to pay for, and yet if the endeavor takes roots, they can flourish, so these different experimentation are a necessity and zero liability for the most part.
then again they buy the competition or enhancing business. They will do fine. Still I believe they should get into energy infrastructure , solar/ battery electric grid, paired with the intelligence monopoly factor of Google.
Google is oversold and undervalued . Cramer called Google a pitiful helpless giant. I say Google is a giant but one gathering its arrows. Google is a win win for the future with unlimited cash and technology innovation.
but the ability to expand the electric lithium battery infrastructure along with power generation and solar pairing could be phenomenal ... yes it was back in 2013. Now too much money probably.
I thought on this over the past few days , the synergies etc. I also believe Google should pair its trade with an additional purchase of solar city or sunpower. Also this morning, i read a footnote where a third party worked with Google in a bid for Tesla.