no, you thinking of winpho os. wm was very popular.
a few year ago ...
dell still looking good?
hpq is next. think they will report a healthy (79% loss in) earnings too? better? ;-)
you realize you must identify yourself as an officer or employee of the company. if you are one ...
if you aren't one then you are identifying yourself as someone who just spews beef stew. :-D
from the tizen faq:
Q: What is Tizen*?
A: Tizen is a web-centric, fully open source mobile platform, based on the Linux kernel. Tizen is claimed to be the leading mobile platform that has full support for HTML5 and other web-centric features. '
so it looks like they have failed in "moving toward a "non-open-source framework"".
the wikipedia article you found seems to be newer than the one that is on their site now. how can that be? ;-)
because the article that is there now says feb. 2013, not may 2013 like the quote you have in your message.
anyway the 2.0 sdk is avail. from the tizen website right now and the home page says "Download the latest Tizen SDK release and start developing your application today!"
and the tizen developer site says that the security framework was contributed by mcafee. ever hear of them?
to find the wrong thing? i don't need bing for that. I can just bring up your posts and read them!
no, maybe that's why you use it. but that kind of defeats the use of a search engine unless disinformation is your goal. and even so i doubt it could be wrong every time!
so if it's not consistent it's not worth using at all. q.e.d.!
oh, you tricky imp!
instead of using the title of the post as your search string, like you always did before, you used a string of text that was in the message this time! consistency will serve you well if you can just learn it. probably too late now tho ...
so the apple insider article was published the day after knox received approval! how interesting!
do you suppose the author was terribly peeved that android was an approved security standard and was trying to muddy the waters with disinformation? or just not up to date on developments in the area he was commenting on? either way he only discredited himself with that silly article.
wait, ... did you write that article? say it isn't so!
you do seem to be sort of an apple fanboi. but just sometimes. and then in a flash you start howling about how the msft phone os is going to kill ios.
it's just flip, flop, flip, flop with you! first the aclu is saving the consumers by suing the carriers to make them provide secure updates and then it's stupid to let consumers have secure oses and you said so all along (both ways of course.)
so now you think an article by a guy who missed the news and thinks the d.o.d. can't manage their own affairs after the deal is already completed is somehow authoritative?
you've just been kidding us all along haven't you? you're really an android app programmer and are just doing this to google bomb the os so you can make even more money off of it.
you absolute imp! ;-)
the search worked fine. i copied and pasted exactly what you posted. it simply didn't point to any apple insider article(s).
not on the ask search page, not on duck duck go, not on ask jeeves, and not on ______ (censored because you will can't deal with it).
what your search string did turn up on all of those search sites is that not only was knox approved by the d.o.d as of may 3rd, the d.s.i.a. approved it today.
so if your search string brings up articles on 4 different sites that show knox is already a d.o.da and d.i.s.a. standard how is that a defect of mine?
another triple :haha: rating!
glad you were able to understand. i was starting to lose hope. i'll be a flake and be satisfied with it.
those that can't do teach. ;-)