How ya doin, zero the world's biggest sicko loser coward? Another new ID I see. Is it your birthday? Ah, but as you should know, it does not matter what ID you use. Everybody can recognize the signature posts of the biggest sicko crybaby coward on the board!! LOL.. gerbils, back door references, excrement, that is YOUR WORLD! Sick, sick, sick, sick, sick.
Even if emails became classified after the fact, how dumb (or arrogant) is it to put emails that may become classified on a personal email server kept in an apartment closet??? Clinton should have known that emails might not start out as classified but can become classified later, and to have them on a private server far less secure than a government server is INAPPROPRIATE. So why in the world would any responsible Secretary of State do that? Arrogance? Thinking they are above the law? Stupidity? Incompetence? How do you spin that, liar libs?
The State Department said it would launch its own investigation into whether top-secret information on Hillary Clinton’s personal email server was classified at the time it was sent or received—a dramatic reversal that comes just days before the Democratic presidential front-runner faces the first nominating contest in Iowa.
Department spokesman John Kirby said 22 documents containing highly classified information will be excluded entirely from the release of Mrs. Clinton’s archive. So far, more than 1,300 of Mrs. Clinton’s emails have been redacted, with portions blocked out, due to the presence of classified information, but this is the first example of emails being entirely withheld from public release.
Friday’s announcement is the first time State Department officials have said they have concerns about the classification level of some of the information contained on Mrs. Clinton’s server. Officials have previously said the redactions in the roughly 43,000 pages of her emails so far released were made for information that was classified only after the fact.
The same kind of woman who tolerates her husband boinking interns?
Perhaps you should get off being stuck on "lemming" and read a little for yourself. There is recent analysis that questions the basic data-gathering used to support the extent of global warming. Temperature readings used to be taken in a different manner.There was a switch to using intake temperatures on ocean going vessels. It is now thought that the water temperature readings were elevated from the transfer of heat from the hull and other factors. It was ever so slight but the extrapolation of a slight error is majorly significant. That is not to say that there is no global warming, but that the extent of it, and therefore the extrapolation to causal factors, may be way off. WAY OFF.
Also, there is evidence that the oceans' ability to aborb heat has been misunderstood and that in normal cycles independent of greenhous gases, cooler water deeper in the oceans may well rise to the surface differently than is currently thought. In short, climatologists may not fully understand el nino and la nina, and have correlated human activity to global warming that is in fact mostly associated with nino and nina. Uh, huh, this is WAY TOO COMPLICATED for a simpleton like you, explaining it is futile.
You liar libs blame Bush for the war in Iraq, which HRC voted in favor of, due to falty intelligence all the way round. All the "entire body of the worlds' climatologists" are all relying on data that now is suspect. Lousy data or lousy intelligence leads to lousy decisions. Extrapolate from that you ignorant fool.
And he was right! HRC is running for POTUS! If she wins, there will be so much hot air... we'll never see snow again!
You don't know the difference between a reply and a comment? He did not reply, he commented....as you often do with words irrelevant to the post you are commenting on...so you know how that rolls, dulzer.
Slick Willy didn't do so well for Hillary when she was running against Obama for the democratic nomination. He had about as much control over his mouth as he did for keeping it in his pants, and that hurt HRC. My guess is that HRC told Willy to watch his mouth, and that plus a concern about what will come out in the run against Trump has Willy shaking in his shoes.
I beleive he is referring to a NEW consideration, not an OLD one. Due try to keep up.
Thanks for bumping my post... lol, idiot!
Just read zeke and you will know. No bigger stupid loser and sicko than zero_loser posing as zeke. His uncontrolled anger issues betray him...he cannot control his mouth.
Honest America does not want another liar in office. Liar lib America would love it.
"Every sexual encounter is not an assault"
That's what Bill Cosby said. Hmmm, BILL Cosby, BILL Clinton.... coincidence?
Actually, Hitler's values quite closely align with you liar libs, who want to DICTATE how everyone lives their lives. Been practicing your goose-step, cheyn?
Do you recall the REASON Trump donated to HRC? He said it was because he knew she would be owing to him if he donated to her campaign. He makes it clear that the system gives big donators influence. It's why he says he will not take money from big contributors. Before you toss out ANOTHER lie, I am not a Trump supporter. Just sayin, he admits to making donations to covet influence... the fact that HRC accepted it reflects more on her than on him.